Re: Intent to hijack the dhelp package

2006-09-30 Thread Esteban Manchado Velázquez
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 11:37:47AM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: Re: Esteban Manchado Velázquez 2006-09-25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have even rewritten dhelp_parse, one of the main utilities, in Ruby [4] (mostly because it's a huge PITA finding and fixing bugs in a largely text processing

Re: Intent to hijack the dhelp package

2006-09-30 Thread Esteban Manchado Velázquez
Hi, On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 05:22:32PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote: [...] Thank you (not that I have anything to do with this package, but all work is welcome) :-) I have even rewritten dhelp_parse, one of the main utilities, in Ruby [4] (mostly because it's a huge PITA

Re: Intent to hijack the dhelp package

2006-09-27 Thread José Luis Tallón
Esteban Manchado Velázquez wrote: Hi all, As Javier noted just after releasing Sarge [1], we need better documentation integration tools in Debian. Yes, we have dhelp [2], but it lacks loads of features, and it's not what I would call in shape [3]. I have tried to fix this situation,

Re: Intent to hijack the dhelp package

2006-09-26 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Esteban Manchado Velázquez 2006-09-25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have even rewritten dhelp_parse, one of the main utilities, in Ruby [4] (mostly because it's a huge PITA finding and fixing bugs in a largely text processing program... written in C). It maintains compatibility with the

Intent to hijack the dhelp package

2006-09-25 Thread Esteban Manchado Velázquez
Hi all, As Javier noted just after releasing Sarge [1], we need better documentation integration tools in Debian. Yes, we have dhelp [2], but it lacks loads of features, and it's not what I would call in shape [3]. I have tried to fix this situation, mostly by organizing and merging bug