Hello Bill,
Bill Allombert [2010-02-14 10:18 +0100]:
The first step is to fix packages that Depend on 'libjpeg62-dev'. They should
Depend on 'libjpeg-dev' instead. Please do not make them Depend on
'libjpeg8-dev', or 'libjpeg-dev|libjpeg62-dev' or 'libjpeg-dev|libjpeg8-dev'
or
other
Hi,
On 14/02/10 10:18, Bill Allombert wrote:
The first step is to fix packages that Depend on 'libjpeg62-dev'. They should
Depend on 'libjpeg-dev' instead. Please do not make them Depend on
'libjpeg8-dev', or 'libjpeg-dev|libjpeg62-dev' or 'libjpeg-dev|libjpeg8-dev'
or
other combinaisons
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:27:12AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hello Bill,
Bill Allombert [2010-02-14 10:18 +0100]:
The first step is to fix packages that Depend on 'libjpeg62-dev'. They
should
Depend on 'libjpeg-dev' instead. Please do not make them Depend on
'libjpeg8-dev', or
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:18:28AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
The first step is to fix packages that Depend on 'libjpeg62-dev'. They should
Depend on 'libjpeg-dev' instead. Please do not make them Depend on
'libjpeg8-dev', or 'libjpeg-dev|libjpeg62-dev' or 'libjpeg-dev|libjpeg8-dev'
or
On 2010-02-14 16:09 +0100, sean finney wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:18:28AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
The first step is to fix packages that Depend on 'libjpeg62-dev'. They
should
Depend on 'libjpeg-dev' instead. Please do not make them Depend on
'libjpeg8-dev', or
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 04:09:18PM +0100, sean finney wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:18:28AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
The first step is to fix packages that Depend on 'libjpeg62-dev'. They
should
Depend on 'libjpeg-dev' instead. Please do not make them Depend on
'libjpeg8-dev',
Bill Allombert wrote:
Naming the package libjpeg8-dev allowed me to upload it, get it built and
tested, before it started to provide libjpeg-dev.
Thats what experimental is for. Other developers manage to ask people to test
newlibraries in experimental, so I fail to understand why you can't do
7 matches
Mail list logo