Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Norbert Preining wrote:
To my reading that thread didn't end in a conclusion that it is not
acceptable.
Furthermore, IMHO, if it would be *not* acceptable, then we would
have to remove all, I repeat *ALL* LPPL licensed packages.
I guess this
Norbert Preining wrote:
And if you take a look at the texlive ml at tug.org, I can assure you
that Karl Berry is very eager in dropping everything from TeX live which
has the slightest problem with being DFSG free.
Hmm... in that case, I should mention my experience with XyMTeX, an
organic
On Die, 29 Nov 2005, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
Hmm... in that case, I should mention my experience with XyMTeX, an
organic chemistry LaTeX package included in TeX Live. Anyone else who
wants to comment on non-DFSG-free components of TeX Live may as well
follow up to this email.
See Debian
Norbert Preining wrote:
To my reading that thread didn't end in a conclusion that it is not
acceptable.
Furthermore, IMHO, if it would be *not* acceptable, then we would
have to remove all, I repeat *ALL* LPPL licensed packages.
I guess this is something we don't want to have in
4 matches
Mail list logo
