On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 08:38:42PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/01/2011 06:19 AM, ximalaya wrote:
Hi all,
[snip]
BTW, I ever tried on Redhat Linux 9, no such problem.
This is the interesting part. Is RH keeping their patches, or are
upstream and other distros just not determining
Hi,
As you may have known, valgrind is a powerful and easy to use tool that can be
used to detect many memory management issues on Linux. Details regarding
valgrind can be seen here,
http://valgrind.org
I notice that, valgrind reports memory leaks against some frequently used
commands on
2011/3/1 ximalaya im...@126.com:
I notice that, valgrind reports memory leaks against some frequently used
commands on Debian 6.0, 5.0.7 and 4.0. These commands include netstat, ps
-ef, ls -latr, top, etc.
For short-running processes that's generally not a problem.
--
Olaf
--
To
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 19:54, Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/3/1 ximalaya im...@126.com:
I notice that, valgrind reports memory leaks against some frequently used
commands on Debian 6.0, 5.0.7 and 4.0. These commands include netstat, ps
-ef, ls -latr, top, etc.
For
01.03.2011 14:56, Aron Xu wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 19:54, Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/3/1 ximalaya im...@126.com:
I notice that, valgrind reports memory leaks against some frequently used
commands on Debian 6.0, 5.0.7 and 4.0. These commands include netstat, ps
Hi,
As you may have known, valgrind is a powerful and easy to use tool that can be
used to detect many memory management issues on Linux. Details regarding
valgrind can be seen here,
http://valgrind.org
I notice that, valgrind reports memory leaks against some frequently used
commands of
Agree with you all. For process that will terminate anyway, this may be not a
problem really.
While if there is any problem with the underlying libraries, it is worth
looking into...
At 2011-03-01 20:19:39，ximalaya im...@126.com wrote:
Hi all,
It's a surprise that you replied this email so
Hi all,
It's a surprise that you replied this email so quickly. Thanks for your timely
comments! Several days ago, I ever posted to debian-u...@lists.debian.org, but
got no response.
BTW, I ever tried on Redhat Linux 9, no such problem.
Thanks,
Xmly
At 2011-03-01 20:04:16，Michael Tokarev
On 03/01/2011 06:19 AM, ximalaya wrote:
Hi all,
[snip]
BTW, I ever tried on Redhat Linux 9, no such problem.
This is the interesting part. Is RH keeping their patches, or are
upstream and other distros just not determining them worthwhile?
--
I prefer banana-flavored energy bars made
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 08:38:42PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/01/2011 06:19 AM, ximalaya wrote:
BTW, I ever tried on Redhat Linux 9, no such problem.
This is the interesting part. Is RH keeping their patches, or are
upstream and other distros just not determining them worthwhile?
Hi!
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 03.38:42 Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/01/2011 06:19 AM, ximalaya wrote:
Hi all,
[snip]
BTW, I ever tried on Redhat Linux 9, no such problem.
This is the interesting part. Is RH keeping their patches, or are
upstream and other distros just not determining
11 matches
Mail list logo
