* Igor Stroh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-06 22:10]:
From what I can tell, cantus3 doesn't actually provide all of the
functionality originally present in cantus.
And it won't either -- the upstream is unresponsive and seems to
have no interest neither in incorporating bug fixes nor in adding
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-03 14:54]:
I intend to ask for removal of the following packages in the next
few days unless someone is willing to step up as maintainer. All of
these packages have been orphaned for over 60 days and have never
been part of a stable release; none
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Igor Stroh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-06 22:10]:
From what I can tell, cantus3 doesn't actually provide all of the
functionality originally present in cantus.
And it won't either -- the upstream is unresponsive and seems to
have no interest neither in incorporating bug
* Igor Stroh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-20 01:18]:
Has there been any agreement about what to do with cantus and cantus3?
Since you're the maintainer of cantus3 and you suggest it's removal,
can you go ahead and file a bug report on ftp.d.o?
I don't like the idea of removing cantus3 right
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:26:34PM -0400, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 00:24 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Your latest comment in #259581 is completely different from this --
please keep the relevant wnpp bug in the loop for stuff like this!
Specifically, your
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 15:01 -0400, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
So, I recently sent an email to the bbconf upstream to know if they're
going to keep working on it. Therefore, I think that we should wait a
bit to know his answers and then I will reply.
Quoting Upstream:
Hm. Well, I agree, it's
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:01:16PM -0400, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 14:54 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I intend to ask for removal of the following packages in the next few
days unless someone is willing to step up as maintainer. All of these
packages have been
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 00:24 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Your latest comment in #259581 is completely different from this --
please keep the relevant wnpp bug in the loop for stuff like this!
Specifically, your latest recorded comment about bbconf is No, I will
not take care about
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 14:54 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I intend to ask for removal of the following packages in the next few
days unless someone is willing to step up as maintainer. All of these
packages have been orphaned for over 60 days and have never been part
of a stable release;
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
#287985: O: cantus -- Gnome tool to mass-rename/tag mp3 and ogg files
Reported by: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 123 days old.
obsoleted by cantus3 which is packaged already
From what I can tell, cantus3 doesn't actually provide all of the
functionality
Ari Pollak wrote:
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
#287985: O: cantus -- Gnome tool to mass-rename/tag mp3 and ogg files
Reported by: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 123 days old.
obsoleted by cantus3 which is packaged already
From what I can tell, cantus3 doesn't actually provide all of
Hello François,
* François-Denis Gonthier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-04 10:08]:
On May 3, 2005 09:54 am, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
#297426: O: langband -- The langband Common lisp game
Reported by: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 63 days old.
#297427: O: langband-data -- The
On May 4, 2005 04:38 am, Nico Golde wrote:
Hello François,
* François-Denis Gonthier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-04 10:08]:
On May 3, 2005 09:54 am, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
#297426: O: langband -- The langband Common lisp game
Reported by: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 63 days
* François-Denis Gonthier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-04 11:05]:
Both are gone of http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/rfa_bypackage, I
guess that means I'm too late?
No, they are listed at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/orphaned
rfa_bypackage is for packages which are RFA: Request For Adoption.
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:29:37PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Fran?ois-Denis Gonthier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-04 11:05]:
Both are gone of http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/rfa_bypackage, I
guess that means I'm too late?
No, they are listed at
I intend to ask for removal of the following packages in the next few
days unless someone is willing to step up as maintainer. All of these
packages have been orphaned for over 60 days and have never been part
of a stable release; none of them have any reverse (build-)dependencies.
#259581: O:
On May 3, 2005 09:54 am, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
#297426: O: langband -- The langband Common lisp game
Reported by: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 63 days old.
#297427: O: langband-data -- The Langband sound/image/etc files for
langband engine Reported by: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL
François-Denis Gonthier wrote:
On May 3, 2005 09:54 am, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
#297426: O: langband -- The langband Common lisp game
Reported by: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 63 days old.
#297427: O: langband-data -- The Langband sound/image/etc files for
langband engine Reported
18 matches
Mail list logo
