Re: gimp 1.1

It would help if you could warn me before upgrading libgimp* in incompatible ways. If you told me about gimp1.2, I missed it, and I apologize. Since gimp1.2 is really the new stable gimp, can't it be in a package called gimp? The libraries are incompatible and need to be different packages, but

gimp 1.1

Kevin Dalley wrote: Source: xsane-gimp1.1 Binary: xsane-gimp1.1 Do we actually need gimp1.1 and associated packages anymore? gimp1.2 in in unstable. -- see shy jo

Re: gimp 1.1

Joey == Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Joey Do we actually need gimp1.1 and associated packages anymore? Joey gimp1.2 in in unstable. Nope, go ahead and toss it if we can get the other libgimp1.1 using packages out too.. Ben -- Brought to you by the letters F and E and the

Re: gimp 1.1

Ben Gertzfield wrote: Joey == Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Joey Do we actually need gimp1.1 and associated packages anymore? Joey gimp1.2 in in unstable. Nope, go ahead and toss it if we can get the other libgimp1.1 using packages out too.. Looks like only gimp-python