On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:42:04PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:17:37AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person
into thinking Branden actually signed this.
except for that long pause for the
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:17:37AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Sep 16 03:12:37 2001) --]
gpg: Signature made Thu Sep 13 20:30:20 2001 PDT using DSA key ID 2B46A27C
gpg: Good signature from Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg: aka
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:17:37AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person
into thinking Branden actually signed this.
except for that long pause for the signature checking itself that was
conspicously missing.
-john
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:42:04PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:17:37AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person
into thinking Branden actually signed this.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 05:06:33PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:42:04PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
I had to watch closely to notice the lack of a GPG verification on it..
As long as you don't miss the 's' in the tagline.
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Sep 16 03:12:37 2001) --]
gpg: Signature made Thu Sep 13 20:30:20 2001 PDT using DSA key ID 2B46A27C
gpg: Good signature from Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg: aka Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg: Fingerprint: 1573 D544 73C3
also sprach Adam McKenna (on Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:17:37AM -0700):
Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person
into thinking Branden actually signed this.
oooh. this is ugly. reported it to bugtraq? if not bugtraq, then at
least michael elkins should know...
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 12:34:22PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
also sprach Adam McKenna (on Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:17:37AM -0700):
Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person
into thinking Branden actually signed this.
oooh. this is ugly. reported it to
Previously Adam McKenna wrote:
Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person
into thinking Branden actually signed this.
That's documented, nothing special about it.
Wichert.
--
_
/
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 02:33:29PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
That's documented
Where?
Previously Aaron Lehmann wrote:
Where?
Euh, the manual I guess? I know I read it somewhere.
Wichert.
--
_
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11 matches
Mail list logo