Andreas Metzler wrote:
Yes, if you want mp3-Encoding.
I see that it links against libvorbis, so perhaps sometime it'll
be possible to use vorbis for soundcompression.
cu andreas
Yep - as soon as we will have more programmers in avifile team :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AM == Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
vcr uses avifile, which is not restricted to the win*-codecs anymore,
but supports/includes libffmpeg (http://ffmpeg.sourceforge.net GPL),
too.
But avifile need lame to encode sound no ?
Yes,
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:01:15PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
EVB == Eric Van Buggenhaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200101/msg02634.html,
I
guess.
IIUC, this message refers to using codecs from microsoft.com, while
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 11:11:58AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:01:15PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
EVB == Eric Van Buggenhaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes. Read legal archive:
AM == Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
But avifile need lame to encode sound no ?
Yes, if you want mp3-Encoding.
I see that it links against libvorbis, so perhaps sometime it'll
be possible to use vorbis for soundcompression.
No, vcr only works with lame.
Christian
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 11:33:29PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 11:17:47PM +0200, NORMAND Jacques wrote:
I want to pack the divx4linux codec on one hand and the transcode utilities
on the other. But I never packed libraries and docs aren't that clear with
that topic.
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 12:15:43PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
Is there any problem keeping them from being included in Debian ?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200101/msg02634.html, I
guess.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen [EMAIL
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 12:25:28PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 12:15:43PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
Is there any problem keeping them from being included in Debian ?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200101/msg02634.html, I
guess.
IIUC,
EVB == Eric Van Buggenhaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200101/msg02634.html,
I
guess.
IIUC, this message refers to using codecs from microsoft.com, while the
divx4linux library provides equivalent,free codecs.
Is this correct ?
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:01:15PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
IIUC, this message refers to using codecs from microsoft.com, while the
divx4linux library provides equivalent,free codecs.
Is this correct ?
Yes. Read legal archive:
GS == Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Yes. Read legal archive:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200101/threads.html#00027
While reading that discussion I do get the impression that OpenDivX is not
DFSG compatible.
Yes, And this is why I don't want to
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:57:05PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
While reading that discussion I do get the impression that
OpenDivX is not DFSG compatible.
Yes, And this is why I don't want to include transcode or x2divx or
another in Debian. Whitout codecs these packages are unusable
AM == Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:57:05PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
While reading that discussion I do get the impression that
OpenDivX is not DFSG compatible.
Yes, And this is why I don't want to include transcode or x2divx or
another in
I am new to package maintaining (even not an official maintainer) and it's
my second try. My test was on a local-used distributed.net client.
(www.fafa37.com for those want want to take a look).
I want to pack the divx4linux codec on one hand and the transcode utilities
on the other. But I never
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 11:17:47PM +0200, NORMAND Jacques wrote:
I want to pack the divx4linux codec on one hand and the transcode utilities
on the other. But I never packed libraries and docs aren't that clear with
that topic. That's why I wan't some clarifications and guidances.
first of
15 matches
Mail list logo
