Re: resolution of the tar -I issue

2001-01-10 Thread Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo
Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 06:08:23PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: depricating -I in Debian Package sounds very good. besides that -j (junkzip?) is NON-DESCRIPTIVE at all. -Z or -2 would be better... but thats an Upstream Issue I guess. -Z is for

Re: resolution of the tar -I issue

2001-01-10 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:18:21PM -0800, Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo wrote: -[0-7][lmh] specify drive and density I'm not sure exactly what that's for, but it does rule out -2. It kinda sucks when you completely run out of single character options. %-) That's for specifying a tape drive and

resolution of the tar -I issue

2001-01-09 Thread Bdale Garbee
I'm satisfied with this solution, and will work with Paul to deliver an implementation for Debian as soon as possible. Bdale --- Forwarded Message Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 12:49:43 -0800 (PST) From: Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL

Re: resolution of the tar -I issue

2001-01-09 Thread Adam Heath
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Bdale Garbee wrote: I'm satisfied with this solution, and will work with Paul to deliver an implementation for Debian as soon as possible. [snip] I'm happy with this solution. BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K-

Re: resolution of the tar -I issue

2001-01-09 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 03:09:34PM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: I'm satisfied with this solution, and will work with Paul to deliver an implementation for Debian as soon as possible. sounds very good. -- Mike Stone

Re: resolution of the tar -I issue

2001-01-09 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 06:08:23PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: depricating -I in Debian Package sounds very good. besides that -j (junkzip?) is NON-DESCRIPTIVE at all. -Z or -2 would be better... but thats an Upstream Issue I guess. Greetings Bernd -- (OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (