On Sun, 26 Apr 1998, Stephen Carpenter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
A few days ago (maybe a week or so? I am too lazy to look back and
check...and it doesn't REALLY matter)
I mentioned an interest in xfstt which is listed as needing
a new maintainer and got no reply
On Thu, Apr 30, 1998 at 01:49:06AM +0200, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
If it is a patch to xfs that uses the freetype libs, I'd think it could be
incorporated into the xfs that is in the xbase package, but I wouldn't
care if it was implemented as a separate font server. Could you contact
Branden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I agree with you on this... xfs probably should be separated...
Tho since I posted this I looked into xfstt again and
found out that it was indeed free to be taken (or at least thats
what the current maintainer led me to believe)...
I in fact have already
Rev. Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 1998 at 01:49:06AM +0200, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
Why is xfs in xbase at all? It's not required to use X. I would suggest
just pulling it out to its own package.
Careful when doing this that you don't break people's configurations
On Thu, Apr 30, 1998 at 12:22:58AM +, Rev. Joseph Carter wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 1998 at 01:49:06AM +0200, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
If it is a patch to xfs that uses the freetype libs, I'd think it could be
incorporated into the xfs that is in the xbase package, but I wouldn't
care if it
On Wed, Apr 29, 1998 at 10:14:18PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Why is xfs in xbase at all? It's not required to use X. I would suggest
just pulling it out to its own package.
I eventually plan to do this. See the X Strike Force page.
http://master.debian.org/~branden/xsf.html
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
A few days ago (maybe a week or so? I am too lazy to look back and
check...and it doesn't REALLY matter)
I mentioned an interest in xfstt which is listed as needing
a new maintainer and got no reply herebut I was told
in a separate discussion (which was the
7 matches
Mail list logo
