-tetex/tetex-bin/trunk/debian/libkpathsea4-dev.README.Debian?op=filerev=0sc=0
[7] http://www.tug.org/texlive/debian.html
[8] https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-texlive/
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
pgprKHRewQl1k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
) this server is really lax in accepting spam (they
only offer to mark it in the subject). But if it was strict, what
should I do? Not forward Debian mail and instead get it from master
with POP3?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] that
just sets the tag, but gives no explanation is as bad as nothing.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
it be acceptable Policy-wise to handle
configuration like this?
Regards, Frank
[1] The configuration file snippets in /etc/texmf/*.d/ would be kept, as
well as configuration files for tetex-bin's programs.
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Hi all,
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are currently thinking about a
solution were there would be hardly any conffiles[1], but a local admin
could put copies of any file he likes into subdirectories of /etc/texmf.
This would shadow
of these cases this
cannot be changed, because the files are simply TeX input files, and we
cannot change TeX's behavior wrt to reading files.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
, either by finding a consensus or by
using our constitutional means of making a decision. Changes should not
be made in advance, except if there is an unrelated technical reason (I
don't know whether this is the case).
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
is implemented, dinstall could also append
a copy of the filelist, with updated md5sums. I'm not familiar with the
ar format, but can one restore the old md5sum when you unpack the deb,
remove the additional signature, and re-ar it?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ
from the same source as the TeX
input files? Or are the input files already included in the TeXlive
repository in their extract version?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
might still be
problematic, it is better than what teTeX has - see the bug #218105.
And I fear that only the combined effort of Debian people caring for
teTeX and for TeXLive will finally enable us to resolve this bug.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian
-source 96M
texlive-basicbin
What about texlive-bin-base?
[...]
And similarly for all the others:
I think that keeping the package names the same as the texlive
collection names would be a great benefit for the users.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ
question would
have been: Do you keep ready-made documentation in the repository, or
are the documentation files created at build-time from the dtx files?.
Obviously, the answer is they are not created at build time.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian
, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
to bloat the package
list even further by providing lots of virtual ones. But on the other
hand, you are all probably right, and it might actually be best to
divert from upstream's names.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
of) maintainers work on this will speed up resolving that bug,
while rejecting texlive because it's copyright file is still not ideal
will not.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10488 March 1977, Frank Küster wrote:
allrunes dfsg
Please: Tell me its not true that the DFSG is used as a license there.
As stated in the License file, this list was generated from the TeX
Catalogue, which *can be wrong*! If you check
need a key without a password that allows logging into
the SVN server machine; I'd prefer not to have that. What do you mean
with https? I don't want to only check out individual files from a
websvn site, but complete directories, including new files.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f
and moved to the new nonfree branch on CTAN will make him rethink his
decision.
Norbert, Karl for sure has more of a name than you and I - do you think
he has time to contact him?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
discuss on
debian-tetex-maint).
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Frank Küster]
Why do we need two packages containing the latex command, for example?
Why do we need N packages that provide MTA functionality?
That's not equivalent. An equivalent question would be more like why
do we need N packages all
@lists.debian.org, asking if anyone is aware of the
whereabouts of the missing maintainer.? ;-)
No, he meant that he was about to submit a patch to it, adding
information about [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 09:51:34AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Frank Küster]
Why do we need two packages containing the latex command, for example?
Why do we need N packages that provide MTA functionality
.
Personally, I assume there will be reasons to keep teTeX; whether they
are strong enough compared to the archive bloat (and the dispersal of
mantainer power) in the long run, that remains to be seen.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
and Gnome than a
couple of libraries is worth implementing. I don't want to be forced to
use some Configuration Tool for this, much less if I need to install
some menu bar on my Desktop (I always delete directories with that
name) to be able to access it properly.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hilmar Preusse's message of
Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:14:14 +0100)
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:45:14 +0100
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Gnus
caused this error (the MAIL FROM:, RCPT TO:,
the HELO, simply what IP you're sending from, or whether it's maybe
transitional...).
Sorry, I'm a DD, am I required to speak SMTP?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
. In the latter
case, I must assume it was a hardware problem, and it's only a question
of time until the next package fails, and of some more time until sarti
becomes unavailable completely.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:39:27PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
What problems are there today with buildd administration, please?
One obvious problem is that there is no documented contact address (just
search for buildd on http://www.debian.org
Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 04:35:14PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
What problems are there today with buildd administration, please?
One obvious problem is that there is no documented contact address (just
search for buildd on http://www.debian.org
, a buildd admin must contact me...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:32:40PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Feature requests and other things are always welcome! I can't know what you
want until you tell it to me. ;)
Nothing - these the questions I was mainly interested in regarding
buildd's
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 09:43:36AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A buildd admin doesn't see much more than what you can see in the build
logs. Basically the build logs is all a buildd admin see
the context: What I
really meant was that during building of packages foo and bar, tetex-bin
was installed as a build-dep, and failed to configure. The postinst
leaves a temporary file in /tmp if it fails, and this is the file I wanted.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ
first,
and only if the fixed packages are available should it migrate to
testing. At least if testing serves any purpose.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 10:43:05AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
If your package isn't going to be suitable for release; it should probably
be in experimental instead, which is even autobuilt these days
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 11:24:39AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
No, that would be unsuitable for release. Which is a problem that
should either be fixed quickly, or means you're trying to make a big
enough change that you should be working out how
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 08:34:04PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Six months is a lot of time; and experimental should provide you with
the space and machine power to handle the rebuilding.
I don't know of any autobuilders that build packages from sid
of anything to say.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
can't just simply use
one symlink pointing to the right place, but need to maintain a complete
tree of TeX input and configuration files, in a setup where users can
mix up trees with one changed line in the central configfile...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
.
The last mail to the bug is from me, and I have not received an answer
yet. Feel free to ask - just Cc debian-tetex-maint.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
to rewrite these things that I outlined, I think
it's better to make our debian/rules and Makefiles compliant than to revert
this change.
I hope fixed Makefiles will continue to work with older versions of
make, right?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian
such jobs... :(
If you are in a hurry doing an NMU, you can also use the common
transcription Kuester.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
specify an URL that correctly shows only bugs open in testing?
TIA, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
much for me
(at least if I really want to be part, and not just receive mail which
is promptly sent to /dev/null), meaning I would have to give away one of
the packages.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
to me that this is a problem in other packages, too. teTeX is one
of them...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
or more guaranteed in your case compared to any
freshmeat/sourceforge/whatever download; they don't require to check
your ID card, let alone sign keys or whatever.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
don't speak sgml or
xml or whatever, and have no idea how to achieve this.
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
@lists.debian.org).
TIA, Frank
(sorry for the prematurely sent first version of this mail)
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would be good if there was a way to find out problematic packages,
by extracting information about
- how many bugs does a package have
- how many of them don't have a single response
- how many have not been
, and of course in the
end you need to process all those packages...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
money. All this does not exist in
Debian, and IMO it doesn't make sense to introduce them.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 10:11:57AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
The difference is who does the work.
I a well-team-maintained package, the work is actually done by the
team, and decisions are made after finding a consensus solution in the
team
Emanuele Rocca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
* Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2005-12-27 10:12 +0100]:
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
(There's plenty of ways to make that not a problem, such as using the
Uploaders: field; but the above might be a useful datapoint
Florian Ludwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are some other packets with the same 'bug' - so i can fill a
wishlist report?
Of course you can, but I'd recommend to spend your time on more
interesting bugs, or on writing your apt output parser...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f
.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully this will work on both versions, but again I don't have easy
access
to an old make to test it. There's also the suggestion elsewhere in the
thread to put the script in a make variable instead.
I
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:24:14 +0100, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Sorry that i didn't check this - I thought that you, Daniel, were
the make maintainer (thanks Adeodato). The rest of my statement
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
why their imagined problem isn't
real won't help out soon. It takes three mails by me and two by you...
Thanks anyway,
Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
maintainers, or anybody else, to
take that package.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Santiago Vila wrote:
Therefore, I hereby announce my Intention To Kill debmake.
Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James R. Van Zandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
emacspeak
I think this has been orphaned, and is waiting for adoption. Cc'ing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
poppler (#344738), orphaned 4 days ago
Reverse Depends: libpoppler-glib-dev libpoppler-dev abiword-plugins
libpoppler-qt-dev libkpathsea4 evince libpoppler0c2-qt tetex-bin
libpoppler0c2-glib
of the debian-admin (responsible
for the hardware) is at it.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
(in tetex-bin) against
libpoppler instead of against its copy of xpdf code.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
-poppler?op=filerev=0sc=0,
and it could probably made even simpler if the #include statements would
not be changed and -L/usr/include/poppler etc. used instead.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:37:53PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
The same happened to the planner package, and has been reported as
#344538. It seems that hppa buildd is broken, don't know yet whether
the buildd admin (Lamont) or anybody of the debian
/archives/poppler/2006-January/001411.html
and
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/poppler/2006-January/001418.html
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
It *seems* it has been fixed; but I don't know whether it has just
disappeared, or has been fixed by human intervention, and if yes by
which. Since the first may be true, it might as well
LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or a bug in some
maintainer script or other;
How a bug in a maintainer script could have the result that installing
an arch-all package fails because
is in the simple, for newbies class?
No, there's actually three classes: Simple editors for newbies,
not-so-simple but, er, powerful editors, and religions.
HTH, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:24:47PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Historically such
problems were unpleasantly frequent on buildds due to a combination of
buggy
postrm scripts, and a bug in dpkg's rollback
.
will fix it, thank you.
.
Most of the time it's quite easy to find this out by looking at
/usr/share/doc/package - either there's a bugreporting link on the
package homepage, or you simply contact the upstream developers by email.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ
to the
package. It's no more than an occasional nuisance, either, probably
comparable.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
.
421 Unable to set up secure anonymous FTP
Login failed.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Yves-Alexis Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Baishampayan Ghose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How did you manage to download the sources from there? I get:
ftp://ftp%40aczoom%2Ecom:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/itrans/53/itrans53.zip
That's exactly what I tried - it doesn't matter which
can't provide a properly
integrated package, please install it into /usr/local.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
much!
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
just copy into my hint file.
Hm, I can't find the context: Are you talking about all such packages,
or only packages with RC bugs?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Yves-Alexis Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Yves-Alexis Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Baishampayan Ghose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How did you manage to download the sources from there? I get:
ftp://ftp%40aczoom%2Ecom:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/itrans/53
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 18:11]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Christoph Berg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 16:28]:
Re: Thomas Viehmann in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Really, how about just automatically[1] removing orphaned
, Frank
[1] and the important one, which might turn out to be RC
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
difficult to learn, but when you master it, you can be
| very fast, and with a huge precision.
`
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
can't expect every problematic
package to be discussed with care and actually orphaned if found
unmaintained.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
to
check the working of the kliked packages and improve their recipes. I
think we should make friends with the klik project and help them.
Shouldn't this have been on debian-devel-announce?
Running, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
are not part of a release and can never get the
same level of support as a stable release gets, like upgrade tests (we
already don't support upgrades from n-2 to n, we'll never be able to
promise an upgrade path for arbitrary combinations of stable+backports).
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single
is needed _in_ the SC, at all.
I disagree - either the interpretation of the SC allows GFDL'ed
documents without invariant (et al) sections, then we don't need a 3:1
majority, or it doesn't - then we have to change it if we want to keep
our promises.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single
majority.
I think the text should rather be fixed before the vote.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
it
into /usr/local/bin), for example in order to debug a particularly weird
problem in a config script?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
is overruled.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
Hi
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=tetex-base
says that tetex-base is 0 days old. However, unstable has 3.0-13 which
was uploaded on Jan 18th:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2006/01/msg01818.html
script will
fail.
Could you describe what you exactly think about? (so that I can imagine
what would happen ... and learn from this)
file:///usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.html/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-mscriptsinstact
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein
to bring db2latex into a better shape isn't an option for you?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
one, without any maintainer
reaction since September 05.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
idea what Last.FM
is. You could explain both, or refer to other packages that are
connected with them.
Not to speak about the other boilerplates...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Davide G. M. Salvetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are willing to help, you can find all needed files on
people:~salve/pub/apt/.
s/pub/public_html/
I didn't find the culprit, unfortunately.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie
1 - 100 of 978 matches
Mail list logo
