Re: Missing gconf schema

2009-03-23 Thread Ludovico Cavedon
2009/3/19 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org:
 Le jeudi 19 mars 2009 à 11:12 -0700, Ludovico Cavedon a écrit :
 are application using gconf *required* to have provide a schema?
 In other words, does it make sense to file a bug against applications
 which fail to do so?

 Theoretically, any application should work without its schemas
 installed. Upstream considers it a bug otherwise. Practically speaking,
 we are far from there and it’s safer to consider them required.

 In all cases, it is really annoying to not have the schema installed,
 because the default will be often incorrect, and there is no
 documentation about the keys’ meaning.

Ok, so I guess a whishlist bug would be acceptable for missing schema.

Thank you for your answer,
Ludovico


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Missing gconf schema

2009-03-23 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 23 mars 2009 à 10:58 -0700, Ludovico Cavedon a écrit :
  Theoretically, any application should work without its schemas
  installed. Upstream considers it a bug otherwise. Practically speaking,
  we are far from there and it’s safer to consider them required.
 
  In all cases, it is really annoying to not have the schema installed,
  because the default will be often incorrect, and there is no
  documentation about the keys’ meaning.
 
 Ok, so I guess a whishlist bug would be acceptable for missing schema.

I’d say this is at least an important bug.

-- 
 .''`.  Debian 5.0 Lenny has been released!
: :' :
`. `'   Last night, Darth Vader came down from planet Vulcan and told
  `-me that if you don't install Lenny, he'd melt your brain.


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée


Missing gconf schema

2009-03-19 Thread Ludovico Cavedon
Hi all,
are application using gconf *required* to have provide a schema?
In other words, does it make sense to file a bug against applications
which fail to do so?

IMHO it makes sense, so you can clean no longer useful keys from the
gconf db, but I could not find a precise policy about that.

Thanks,
Ludovico


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Missing gconf schema

2009-03-19 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 19 mars 2009 à 11:12 -0700, Ludovico Cavedon a écrit :
 are application using gconf *required* to have provide a schema?
 In other words, does it make sense to file a bug against applications
 which fail to do so?

Theoretically, any application should work without its schemas
installed. Upstream considers it a bug otherwise. Practically speaking,
we are far from there and it’s safer to consider them required.

In all cases, it is really annoying to not have the schema installed,
because the default will be often incorrect, and there is no
documentation about the keys’ meaning.

-- 
 .''`.  Debian 5.0 Lenny has been released!
: :' :
`. `'   Last night, Darth Vader came down from planet Vulcan and told
  `-me that if you don't install Lenny, he'd melt your brain.


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée