Re: Bug #23877: Include autoup.sh and apt in hamm/hamm

[Craig Sanders]

On 25 Jun 1998, Ben Gertzfield wrote:

  Subject: please include apt and autoup in
  hamm/hamm/upgrade-i386/ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Package:
  ftp.debian.org,apt,autoup Version: N/A
 
 Well, let's just do it! I see no problem with making such a directory
 for final hamm.

imo this directory should also be populated with symlinks to all the
packages which autoup.sh needs to do the upgrade.

there should also be a copy of the the bo libc5 dpkg in there, to assist
with upgrades from rex/buzz.

craig

--
craig sanders


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug #23877: Include autoup.sh and apt in hamm/hamm

[Ben Gertzfield]

 Jens == Jens Ritter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Jens Andreas [EMAIL PROTECTED] filed this against
Jens ftp.debian.org:

 Subject: please include apt and autoup in
 hamm/hamm/upgrade-i386/ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Package:
 ftp.debian.org,apt,autoup Version: N/A
 
 i think this is the right location. if people want to get all
 files they need to install or burn a cdrom, they should have
 one source, and not collect the files from several servers
 (which might be down or unreachable or ...).
 
 this bug should be either wishlist and ignored or marked
 grave IMO.
 
 andreas

Jens I think this needs a thorough discussion here, too, that´s
Jens why I forward it here.

Well, let's just do it! I see no problem with making such a directory
for final hamm.

Ben

-- 
Brought to you by the letters J and O and the number 6.
We are the music makers. And we are the dreamers of dreams. -- Willy Wonka
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]