Re: autoreconf --force not forcing (was Re: Validating tarballs against git repositories)

2024-04-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 08:20:31PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 06:05:22PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 06:57:20PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Does gnulib upstream support upgrading/downgrading the gnulib m4 files > > > (like the one used in the

Re: autoreconf --force not forcing (was Re: Validating tarballs against git repositories)

2024-04-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 06:05:22PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 06:57:20PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 08:07:27PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > On Sat, 2024-03-30 at 14:16:21 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > > This seems like a serious bug in

Re: autoreconf --force not forcing (was Re: Validating tarballs against git repositories)

2024-04-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 06:57:20PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 08:07:27PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Sat, 2024-03-30 at 14:16:21 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > This seems like a serious bug in autoreconf, but I've not checked if > > > this has been brought up

Re: autoreconf --force not forcing (was Re: Validating tarballs against git repositories)

2024-04-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 08:07:27PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: >... > On Sat, 2024-03-30 at 14:16:21 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: >... > > This seems like a serious bug in autoreconf, but I've not checked if > > this has been brought up upstream, and whether they consider it's > > working as