(moving the discussion over to a bug that acutally isn't fixed by
my patch.)
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 01:26:04PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
I have read and tested your patch of Fri, 12 May 2006 22:38:56 -0500. I
confirm that it fixes the problem for defoma/ttf-bitstream-vera and that
it does
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:05:30PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
The problem is that the packages in the removed-but-not-yet-purged state
still contain empty directories, ones that don't contain conffiles.
Above, for example, /usr and stuff below it should not be there for
ttf-bitstream-vera.
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:49:32PM -0500, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I have an alternative patch that at least fixes the defoma/ttf-bitstream
case. I haven't tested all the other packages yet. Comments and
testing welcome.
Cases that this patch doesn't fix include openssl/ca-certificates
and
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:49:32PM -0500, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I have an alternative patch that at least fixes the defoma/ttf-bitstream
case. I haven't tested all the other packages yet. Comments and
testing welcome.
Updated patch that also deals with the similar case on upgrade.
Index:
Sorry for the excessive delay.
ma, 2006-02-20 kello 20:55 +0100, Bart Martens kirjoitti:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# dpkg --remove defoma ttf-bitstream-vera
(Reading database ... 12290 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing ttf-bitstream-vera ...
Removing defoma ...
...
[EMAIL
Hi Lars,
Before I comment on the rest of your e-mail, I want to understand the
example you gave with defoma and ttf-bitstream-vera.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 01:09:00PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Incidentally, I'm attaching the script I'm using to test this dpkg bug.
To use, first create a
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 12:50:41AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
There is one problem with the patch: It has the potential
to leave empty directories behind on removal (they will get
removed on purge, though).
This happens in the case that two packages which have both conffiles
share a
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 04:30:15AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Summary: as far as I can see, the experimental version of dpkg plus
Bart's patch to fix this bug work quite well. I'm looking forward to
seeing them in unstable.
There is one problem with the patch: It has the potential
to leave
ma, 2006-01-16 kello 00:45 +0100, Bart Martens kirjoitti:
I've had a look at your patches, and I didn't feel comfortable with the
idea of adding a generated list of parent directories. I think it's
better to prevent that the forgotten directories become forgotten. The
patch below does that.
Goswin, Lars,
I've had a look at your patches, and I didn't feel comfortable with the
idea of adding a generated list of parent directories. I think it's
better to prevent that the forgotten directories become forgotten. The
patch below does that.
Regards,
Bart Martens
diff -ru
10 matches
Mail list logo