Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 103024 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#103024: dpkg-shlibdeps mostly useless on the Hurd
Tags were: pending patch
Bug#145714: dpkg-shlibdeps doesn't work correctly on the Hurd
Bug#164020: expect should depend on libtcl8.3 under GNU/Hurd
Bug#285857:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:14:16PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I've implemented this option. Patch and new script (since the patch is
garbled with a little code clean-up I did while going through the
script) are attached.
Comments and/or testing welcome.
Comment to myself: The
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:05:43PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:14:16PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Comment to myself: The current patch probably breaks dh_shlibdeps
-l option because it doesn't honor LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Can someone
tell me a
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:43:02PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
dpkg-shlibdeps calls ldd, which will just fail if LD_LIBRARY_PATH won't
point to directories with local libraries.
That's not true. ldd will just happily print libfoo.so.1 = not found
and exit with exit code 0. So this
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:43:02PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
dpkg-shlibdeps calls ldd, which will just fail if LD_LIBRARY_PATH
won't point to directories with local libraries.
That's not true. ldd will just happily print libfoo.so.1 = not found
and exit with exit code 0. So this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
tags 338863 unreproducible
Bug#338863: dpkg-parsechangelog: failure: tail of debian/changelog died from
signal 11
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
End of message,
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 03:18:01AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
# Now: See if it is in this package. See if it is in any other package.
sub searchdir {
my $dir = shift;
if(opendir(DIR, $dir)) {
my @dirents = readdir(DIR);
closedir(DIR);
for (@dirents) {
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:39:56 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
tags 258192 moreinfo
Bug#258192: malformed build-depends entry confusing dpkg-checkbuilddeps
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
End of message, stopping processing here.
Quoting Stephan Kramer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
While you're at it you might want to replace the erronous translation of
src/configure.c:602
Y or I : install the package maintainer's version\n
now translated as:
Y of N : installeer de versie van de pakketbeheerder\n
which should
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 153305 + patch
Bug#153305: [DPKG] doesn't pass --admindir and --root to dpkg-query
There were no tags set.
Bug#271041: [DPKG] doesn't pass --admindir and --root to dpkg-query
Bug#282853: [DPKG] doesn't pass --admindir and --root to dpkg-query
Sigh. Patch really attached this time.
--
Branden Robinson | GPG signed/encrypted mail welcome
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 1024D/9C0BCBFB
Progeny Linux Systems | D5F6 D4C9 E25B 3D37 068C
| 72E8 0F42 191A 9C0B CBFB
Index:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:00:28PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 03:18:01AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
# Now: See if it is in this package. See if it is in any other package.
sub searchdir {
my $dir = shift;
if(opendir(DIR, $dir)) {
my @dirents =
ma, 2006-01-16 kello 00:45 +0100, Bart Martens kirjoitti:
I've had a look at your patches, and I didn't feel comfortable with the
idea of adding a generated list of parent directories. I think it's
better to prevent that the forgotten directories become forgotten. The
patch below does that.
14 matches
Mail list logo
