Simon Richter s...@debian.org writes:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 04:11:15PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
FYI: This is a non-issue for apt-ma-emu. The libfoo-dev-arch-cross
package will just depend on libfoo-dev-common or
libfoo-whatever-arch-cross and pull them in too.
This means
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 09:47:39AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
If the package is Architecture: all then it won't be renamed for
apt. That means apt will pull the original package and install it
natively.
That assumes working multiarch. Currently, header-only libraries like
Boost
Simon Richter s...@debian.org writes:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 09:47:39AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
If the package is Architecture: all then it won't be renamed for
apt. That means apt will pull the original package and install it
natively.
That assumes working multiarch.
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:04:57 +0200
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote:
Please don't CC: me, I'm on the list.
Do i remember correctly that dpkg-cross by default skips the package if
the result would be empty? But yes, empty (except for /usr/share/doc/*)
packages have to be handled
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:04:57AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[That assumes working multiarch.]
I don't think so. What would you change in the conversion? With
sysroot=/ the include files don't need to be moved to
/usr/triplet/include, the /usr/include is just fine.
The cross
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes:
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:04:57 +0200
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote:
Please don't CC: me, I'm on the list.
Do i remember correctly that dpkg-cross by default skips the package if
the result would be empty? But yes, empty (except for
Simon Richter s...@debian.org writes:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:04:57AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[That assumes working multiarch.]
I don't think so. What would you change in the conversion? With
sysroot=/ the include files don't need to be moved to
/usr/triplet/include,
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:36:03 +0200
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote:
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes:
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:04:57 +0200
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote:
Please don't CC: me, I'm on the list.
Do i remember correctly that dpkg-cross
Hello,
2010/7/1 Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de:
It seems binutils already switched over a while ago:
binutils (2.19.51.20090827-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Snapshot, taken from the trunk 20090827.
- Fix PR ld/10518: In linker scripts override a * match by any other
+++ Neil Williams [2010-07-01 15:29 +0100]:
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:36:03 +0200
Wrong.
dpkg-cross: package debconf doesn't provide any useful files. Skipping.
Wrong
Can people stop calling each other 'wrong' in such a confrontational
manner please. I'm not convinced that the world is
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:34:35 +0100
Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
Can people stop calling each other 'wrong' in such a confrontational
manner please. I'm not convinced that the world is falling in here,
and having a big argument isn't very likely to help.
OK - all I want is a replacement
+++ Neil Williams [2010-07-01 19:13 +0100]:
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:34:35 +0100
Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
So the change is that not all the development files need to be in the
-dev package, but could be in packages depended on by -dev.
This does break the convenient
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes:
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:36:03 +0200
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote:
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes:
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:04:57 +0200
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote:
Please don't CC: me, I'm on the list.
13 matches
Mail list logo
