On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:29:09PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
vore:~ dpkg
Bus error
Well, if I compile lib/myopt.c and lib/startup.c, without -O2, I get no bus
error. Maybe this is a gcc issue?
FWIW, the comment here
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366#c8
glibc_2.3.2-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
glibc_2.3.2-4.dsc
glibc_2.3.2-4.diff.gz
libc6_2.3.2-4_i386.deb
libc-udeb_2.3.2-4_i386.udeb
libc6-dev_2.3.2-4_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2-4_i386.deb
libc6-dbg_2.3.2-4_i386.deb
Accepted:
glibc-doc_2.3.2-4_all.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2-4_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-4.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2-4.dsc
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-4.dsc
libc-udeb_2.3.2-4_i386.udeb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc-udeb_2.3.2-4_i386.udeb
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libc6-dbg_2.3.2-4_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel.
libc6-prof_2.3.2-4_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel.
Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:34:27 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#206895: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:pb
time: Tue Aug 26 15:52:28 MDT 2003
Log Message:
starting 2.3.2-5
Files:
changed:changelog control
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:34:27 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#206839: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:34:27 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#206839: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:34:27 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#206464: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:34:27 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#206839: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:34:27 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#202243: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:34:27 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#206783: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:34:27 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#206839: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
I've no real idea what's going on here. However, since glibc does build
from source just fine for the autobuilders, I guess there must be some
problem with your local build environment.
If you could provide a complete build log, that might help to pinpoint
what's going wrong.
p.
--
To
At Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:15:58 -0500,
Zed Pobre wrote:
Severity: serious
Please don't use this tag if you modify our original libc6 package.
I have been attempting to build glibc with the parenthesis added to
10_cvs.dpatch as noted in bug#202243 (this is the first, minimally
invasive patch,
At Mon, 25 Aug 2003 16:42:57 +0200,
Michael Piefel wrote:
When profiling threads, gprof actually only profiles the main thread,
which is quite useless. The reason is that there is only one timer for
the profiling, and that belongs to the main thread. In the profiling
case, each thread needs
Accepted:
libc6-dev_2.3.2-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2-4_i386.deb
libc6_2.3.2-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2-4_i386.deb
locales_2.3.2-4_all.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2-4_all.deb
Brilliant work thanks everyone. I have installed and tested the
tags 207221 + patch
thanks
I suppose this is fairly obvious, but here is a dpatch you can drop in
(to the source) that should hopefully fix the problem. I'm currently
building it in my chroot and we'll see what happens.
-Josh
#! /bin/sh -e
# DP: Fix use of a GNU extension in inline math
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
unmerge 205328
Bug#205328: libc6 upgrade breaks several programs
Bug#202756: glibc 2.3.2 breaks rpc.mountd (nfs-kernel-server)
Disconnected #205328 from all other report(s).
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Repository: glibc-package/debian/control.in
who:gotom
time: Tue Aug 26 18:40:40 MDT 2003
Log Message:
- debian/control.in/libc: Add more missing change section for -pic,
-dbg, -prof packages from devel to libdevel.
- debian/control.in/libc-dbg: likewise.
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Tue Aug 26 18:58:29 MDT 2003
Log Message:
- debian/patches/80_glibc232-locales-header.dpatch: Fix an_ES,
wa_BE, yi_US localedata header. (Closes: #194289)
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 207221 + patch
Bug#207221: libc6-dev: gcc3.3 complains bits/mathinline.h fails ISO C++
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Dear Eivind,
I'm one of packager in debian project glibc package. Recently I got
the attached report. Could you judge this suggestion? I don't know
Norwegian language, so I can't understand what this means.
Best regards,
-- gotom
---BeginMessage---
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-3
Severity:
At Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:13:30 +,
Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 06:50:43PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
OK, so is debian freebsd community (I don't know other guys are
existed or not) agreed with this name scheme and it's their a
consensus of opinion? Does this name
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 26 Aug 2003 10:13:23 -0400,
Greg Stark wrote:
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your file seems being broken. Compare your file using md5sum. I
think you need to reinstall libc6 and locales.
Ok, I've verified the md5sum by
Huh, yes, unsetting POSIXLY_CORRECT avoided triggering the problem.
--
greg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 12:27, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
this seems to be fixed upstream
Looks that way. I'll import those patches into the Debian tree. Thanks
for pointing it out.
p.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Repository: glibc-package/debian/control.in
who:pb
time: Wed Aug 27 05:25:11 MDT 2003
Log Message:
add build-depends intended to be in 2.3.2-4
Files:
changed:main
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:pb
time: Wed Aug 27 07:01:04 MDT 2003
Log Message:
- debian/packages.d/*.mk: add md5sums for generated packages,
thanks to Petr Konecny. (Closes: #158354)
- debian/locales/DEBIAN/config: The Leave alone option has been
Repository: glibc-package/debian/locales/DEBIAN
who:pb
time: Wed Aug 27 07:01:04 MDT 2003
Log Message:
- debian/packages.d/*.mk: add md5sums for generated packages,
thanks to Petr Konecny. (Closes: #158354)
- debian/locales/DEBIAN/config: The Leave alone option
Repository: glibc-package/debian/packages.d
who:pb
time: Wed Aug 27 07:01:04 MDT 2003
Log Message:
- debian/packages.d/*.mk: add md5sums for generated packages,
thanks to Petr Konecny. (Closes: #158354)
- debian/locales/DEBIAN/config: The Leave alone option has
Your message dated 27 Aug 2003 14:19:23 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line libc6: __ctype_b_loc is not properly exported
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 140891 + moreinfo
Bug#140891: en_GB does not define AM/PM
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: moreinfo
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 194289 + pending
Bug#194289: definition errors in an_ES locale
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# even 1 byte buffer overrun sounds like bad news
severity 194637 important
Bug#194637: Buffer overflow (1 byte) in sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ttyname_r.c
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 11:07:00AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
As far as L/GPL incompatibility is concerned, you'll note that Sun,
the copyright holders, specifically offer Linux systems that include
glibc with GPLed applications, and an LGPLed libc, to their customers.
See
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-3
Severity: important
I'm using Debian unstable, customized kernel 2.4.21-ac1, libc6 2.3.2-3.
The error occurs with Citrix ICAClient 6.30. It starts then stops with a
segmentation fault. The reason I think this is a fault in libc6 is that
a) it did not happen before
37 matches
Mail list logo
