On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 20:19, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
There is no bug in the kernel headers. Undefining __STRICT_ANSI__ is a
terribly bad thing to do. Fix this by adding a #define inline __inline__
below the #define asm __asm__, I suppose.
Interestingly, plat_linux_cdda.c says:
#undef
Greetings, and thank you again for your vital feedback. The solution
I've just implemented would have been impossible without it.
I'm pleased to announce a just-committed resolution to this issue,
bringing stability to gcl/maxima/acl2/axiom on ia64 and any future
platform like it which may use
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:22:11PM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:47:14AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Anyway, just wait a bit and it'll be fine, or download the older version
of locales by hand. It's not difficult.
While waiting or downgrading is an option, I simply
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:47:14AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:28:48AM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
Architecture: all packages such as locales are only built on one
architecture, but used by all architectures regardless of whether the
Package: libc6
Severity: important
This may turn out to be a gdb bug, but let's start here...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat foo.c
int main(void)
{
abort();
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -o foo foo.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./foo
Aborted (core dumped)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb foo core
GNU gdb 6.0-debian
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 05:26:32PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:22:11PM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:47:14AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Anyway, just wait a bit and it'll be fine, or download the older version
of locales by hand. It's
Your message dated Thu, 06 Nov 2003 12:17:29 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#204789: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:35:24PM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 05:26:32PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:22:11PM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:47:14AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Anyway, just wait a bit and it'll
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 219352 libc6
Bug#219352: should depend on libmikmod2
Bug reassigned from package `xmms' to `libc6'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 219458 libc6
Bug#219458: touch fails to set the file {a,m}time correctly on hppa
Bug reassigned from package `coreutils' to `libc6'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
#include hallo.h
* Otto Wyss [Sun, Nov 02 2003, 10:21:14AM]:
Since when does the package libc6-dev depend on linux-kernel-headers? Is
this dependes really necessary?
without further checks of feasibility
What not rename linux-kernel-headers to simple system-headers-linux?
This will prevent
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-9
Severity: normal
File: /usr/include/sys/vm86.h
See manpages-dev man 2 vm86 for what *should* be there. The current
version was correct until kernel 2.1.15 and 2.0.28 - surely that were
libc5 times?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 219352 Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c:
72: _dl_next_tls_modid: Assertion `result = _rtld_local._dl_tls_max_dtv_idx'
failed!
Bug#219352: should depend on libmikmod2
Changed Bug title.
--
Stopping processing
Your message dated Fri, 07 Nov 03 11:52:12 GMT
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Your VALIUM Prescription is ready.. cvcglw
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Ok, I have this working now.
I figured out that I needed to download the files for i686 from here:
http://ftp.debian.org/pool/main/g/glibc/
Note that when I checked previously the i686 files were not there - only the
ia64 and hppa etc.
Anyway, I then ran
dpkg - i each_of_the_deb_files
and it
reopen 203303 !
thanks
ccing original submitter as well - he's probably going to get bitten by
this as well.
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #203303
This bug is fixed on i386, and it looks like hppa as well. However it
is still broken on ia64, alpha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 203303 !
Bug#203303: linux/byteorder/swab.h: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within
expressions
Bug reopened, originator set to Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED].
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Hi debian-amd64 guys,
We're encountering #218657. This bug says many programs become
unusable when libc6 2.3.2.ds1-8 + kernel 2.6 is used on amd64
architecture. We all debian-glibc developers can't access such
machine, so could anyone try to reproduce and track this problem?
(I resend this
From: Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 11:41:47AM +0100
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (local.debian.rcbugs) you wrote:
I see the same error message, with qmail.
When I compile and run it with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1,
it still works.
This is
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 10:07:27PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:21:16PM -0200, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
libc6-i686 won't work in a K6. An libc6-i586 would be useful for using
NPTL on a i586 (if it works, I recall at least Gentoo's glibc didn't
compile
Please excuse my ignorance, but how do I install this update?
I can't install or remove anything using apt-get due to libc6 failing on the
ldconfig fault. Do I just need to do apt-get update dist-upgrade but first
modify the sources.list to pick the new files up?
Do I just download the deb file
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 15:20, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Or do you mean that this is a bug that can't be fixed because it's
present in the JDK via static linking or simliar, and not in glibc?
That's correct. It's a problem in the JDK, and one of the changes in
later versions was to fix it.
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-6
Severity: important
While compiling kdemultimedia from source:
make[6]: Entering directory
`/home/Amit/sources/konstruct/kde/kdemultimedia/work/kdemultimedia-3.1.93/kscd/libwm'
if /bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=compile cc
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:11:42PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-6
Severity: important
Try -8 please.
While compiling kdemultimedia from source:
make[6]: Entering directory
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-8
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #219428
--- byteorder.h.orig2003-11-06 19:23:14.0 +0530
+++ byteorder.h 2003-11-06 19:23:24.0 +0530
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
#if !defined (__STRICT_ANSI__)
-static inline __u64
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:26:05PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-8
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #219428
--- byteorder.h.orig2003-11-06 19:23:14.0 +0530
+++ byteorder.h 2003-11-06 19:23:24.0 +0530
@@ -39,7 +39,7
On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 19:22, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:11:42PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-6
Severity: important
Try -8 please.
doesn't help; I've posted the patch though (in a separate message)
--
Amit
On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 19:42, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:26:05PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-8
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #219428
--- byteorder.h.orig2003-11-06 19:23:14.0 +0530
+++
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 08:16:21PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 19:42, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:26:05PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-8
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #219428
On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 20:19, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
There is no bug in the kernel headers. Undefining __STRICT_ANSI__ is a
terribly bad thing to do. Fix this by adding a #define inline __inline__
below the #define asm __asm__, I suppose.
This issue has been noticed and discussed here:
On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 20:19, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
There is no bug in the kernel headers. Undefining __STRICT_ANSI__ is a
terribly bad thing to do. Fix this by adding a #define inline __inline__
below the #define asm __asm__, I suppose.
Interestingly, plat_linux_cdda.c says:
#undef
Greetings, and thank you again for your vital feedback. The solution
I've just implemented would have been impossible without it.
I'm pleased to announce a just-committed resolution to this issue,
bringing stability to gcl/maxima/acl2/axiom on ia64 and any future
platform like it which may use
Package: libc6
Severity: important
This may turn out to be a gdb bug, but let's start here...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat foo.c
int main(void)
{
abort();
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -o foo foo.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./foo
Aborted (core dumped)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb foo core
GNU gdb 6.0-debian
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 05:26:32PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:22:11PM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:47:14AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Anyway, just wait a bit and it'll be fine, or download the older version
of locales by hand. It's
Your message dated Thu, 06 Nov 2003 12:17:29 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#204789: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:35:24PM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 05:26:32PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:22:11PM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:47:14AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Anyway, just wait a bit and it'll
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 05:39:23PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
Package: libc6
Severity: important
This may turn out to be a gdb bug, but let's start here...
That just means GDB can't backtrace through abort. The compiler knows
that abort is a noreturn function, and is allowed to take all
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 219352 libc6
Bug#219352: should depend on libmikmod2
Bug reassigned from package `xmms' to `libc6'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 219458 libc6
Bug#219458: touch fails to set the file {a,m}time correctly on hppa
Bug reassigned from package `coreutils' to `libc6'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
#include hallo.h
* Otto Wyss [Sun, Nov 02 2003, 10:21:14AM]:
Since when does the package libc6-dev depend on linux-kernel-headers? Is
this dependes really necessary?
without further checks of feasibility
What not rename linux-kernel-headers to simple system-headers-linux?
This will prevent
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-9
Severity: normal
File: /usr/include/sys/vm86.h
See manpages-dev man 2 vm86 for what *should* be there. The current
version was correct until kernel 2.1.15 and 2.0.28 - surely that were
libc5 times?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 219352 Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c: 72:
_dl_next_tls_modid: Assertion `result = _rtld_local._dl_tls_max_dtv_idx' failed!
Bug#219352: should depend on libmikmod2
Changed Bug title.
--
Stopping processing here.
Your message dated Fri, 07 Nov 03 11:52:12 GMT
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Your VALIUM Prescription is ready.. cvcglw
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Ok, I have this working now.
I figured out that I needed to download the files for i686 from here:
http://ftp.debian.org/pool/main/g/glibc/
Note that when I checked previously the i686 files were not there - only the
ia64 and hppa etc.
Anyway, I then ran
dpkg - i each_of_the_deb_files
and it
reopen 203303 !
thanks
ccing original submitter as well - he's probably going to get bitten by
this as well.
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #203303
This bug is fixed on i386, and it looks like hppa as well. However it
is still broken on ia64, alpha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 203303 !
Bug#203303: linux/byteorder/swab.h: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions
Bug reopened, originator set to Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED].
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 67921
Bug#67921: glob(3) doesn't treat \ correctly
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Hi debian-amd64 guys,
We're encountering #218657. This bug says many programs become
unusable when libc6 2.3.2.ds1-8 + kernel 2.6 is used on amd64
architecture. We all debian-glibc developers can't access such
machine, so could anyone try to reproduce and track this problem?
(I resend this
From: Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 11:41:47AM +0100
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (local.debian.rcbugs) you wrote:
I see the same error message, with qmail.
When I compile and run it with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1,
it still works.
This is
49 matches
Mail list logo
