Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
owner 215367 !
Bug#215367: ITP: pylibpcap -- A Python binding for the packet capture library
libpcap
Owner changed from Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL
PROTECTED].
owner 282313 !
Bug#282313: ITP: python-google -- A Python Interface
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-02-03 13:25:17 +0100 (Sat, 03 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 1928
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.5/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.5/debian/script.in/kernelcheck.sh
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.5/debian/sysdeps/linux.mk
Log:
*
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22
iconv_open and iconv_close for some encodings in some sequence causes
Segmentation fault. I`m stable reproduce segmentation fault only with
static linking. Without static linking reproduce error more difficult.
Here is a transcript:
$ cat bug1.cpp
#include
Jurij Smakov a écrit :
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.6.ds1-10
Severity: important
Hi,
The iconv() function may die with bus error due to unaligned memory
accesses on sparc and, probably, other platforms with strict alignment
requirements. It can be occasionally triggered by attempting
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
severity 409494 minor
Bug#409494: Segmentation fault in iconv_open/iconv_close for some encodings in
some sequence
Severity set to `minor' from `normal'
End of message, stopping
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 06:01:16PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include iconv.h
#include string.h
int main()
{
iconv_t cd;
size_t inr = 4, outr = 8, res;
char *inbuf = strdup(abcde);
char *outbuf =
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.6.ds1-10
During a new installation using D-I/debootstrap of testing I noticed the
following error in the syslog. It looks like dpkg --compare-versions is
not called correctly, possibly because this is an initial installation
and not an upgrade. I suspect the error to
reassign 406946 manpages-dev
thanks
Jurij Smakov a écrit :
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 06:01:16PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include iconv.h
#include string.h
int main()
{
iconv_t cd;
size_t inr = 4, outr = 8, res;
char *inbuf =
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 406946 manpages-dev
Bug#406946: iconv() crashes during WCHAR_T - ASCII conversion on sparc
Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `manpages-dev'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Looks like it is indeed the postinst. This has:
if [ $type = configure ]
then
[...]
# Add support for /etc/ld.so.conf.d
if dpkg --compare-versions $preversion lt 2.3.6-16; then
Which is probably not correct on initial installation.
pgpzPbSLfDeLB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Frans Pop a écrit :
Looks like it is indeed the postinst. This has:
if [ $type = configure ]
then
[...]
# Add support for /etc/ld.so.conf.d
if dpkg --compare-versions $preversion lt 2.3.6-16; then
Which is probably not correct on initial installation.
Yep, I confirm that.
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-02-03 20:16:19 +0100 (Sat, 03 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 1929
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.5/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.5/debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
Hi all,
Looking at the developement done on the glibc package over last months,
I have remarked that we are able to keep up with serious, grave and most
important bugs, but this is not the case for the other bugs.
We are also missing somebody to work on the locales now that Denis
Barbier has
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-02-03 21:09:18 +0100 (Sat, 03 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 1930
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst
Log:
Better fix for bug#409516
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-02-03 21:11:27 +0100 (Sat, 03 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 1931
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.5/debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst
Log:
Same fix for experimental
Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.5/debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst
retitle 409516 libc6: fails to add /etc/ld.so.conf.d support on new installs
severity 409516 serious
thanks
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 08:08:10PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Frans Pop a écrit :
Looks like it is indeed the postinst. This has:
if [ $type = configure ]
then
[...]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 409516 libc6: fails to add /etc/ld.so.conf.d support on new installs
Bug#409516: libc6: error in dpkg --compare-versions call
Changed Bug title.
severity 409516 serious
Bug#409516: libc6: fails to add /etc/ld.so.conf.d support on new installs
glibc_2.3.6.ds1-11_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
glibc_2.3.6.ds1-11.dsc
glibc_2.3.6.ds1-11.diff.gz
glibc-doc_2.3.6.ds1-11_all.deb
locales_2.3.6.ds1-11_all.deb
libc6_2.3.6.ds1-11_amd64.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.6.ds1-11_amd64.deb
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libc6-i386_2.3.6.ds1-11_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says standard.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct
Accepted:
glibc-doc_2.3.6.ds1-11_all.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.6.ds1-11_all.deb
glibc_2.3.6.ds1-11.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.6.ds1-11.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.6.ds1-11.dsc
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.6.ds1-11.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.6.ds1-11_amd64.deb
to
Your message dated Sat, 03 Feb 2007 21:47:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#220719: fixed in glibc 2.3.6.ds1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 03 Feb 2007 21:47:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#220719: fixed in glibc 2.3.6.ds1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 03 Feb 2007 21:47:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#409516: fixed in glibc 2.3.6.ds1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
23 matches
Mail list logo
