Bug#401749: marked as done (mktime() does not return -1 for some BROKENTIME it should)

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:23:37 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line mktime() does not return -1 for some BROKENTIME it should has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Processed: reassign 345378 to binutils

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 reassign 345378 binutils Bug#345378: glibc: __libc_atexit section disappears with --gc-sections, breaking exit-flushing Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `binutils'. End of

Bug#366469: marked as done (grep -i segfaults matching a binary file in zh_CN.GBK locale)

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:43:11 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#366469: grep segfaults has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#420552: ARM: apt-get source: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c:68: make_request: Assertion...

2007-04-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: apt,libc6 Severity: important After upgrading my ARM sid chroot to current sid, I get the following when running apt-get source. Is this a bug in apt or libc6? (sid)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src$ apt-get source texlive-bin Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Need

Bug#420552: ARM: apt-get source: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c:68: make_request: Assertion...

2007-04-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
reassign 420552 libc6 found 420552 2.5-3 severity 420552 serious retitle 420552 ARM: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c:68: make_request: Assertion... thanks * Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-23 09:37]: After upgrading my ARM sid chroot to current sid, I get the following when

OOo fails to build with glibc 2.5 in Debian (on sparc)

2007-04-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, OOos idlc hangs when building it on sparc. I tried a manual build to check whether it builds (because experimental did never build it and even if it would it would have used the old lib which was in sid at that time; and the buildd has problems

Processed: Bug#420552: ARM: apt-get source: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c:68: make_request: Assertion...

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 420552 libc6 Bug#420552: ARM: apt-get source: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c:68: make_request: Assertion... Bug reassigned from package `apt,libc6' to `libc6'. found 420552 2.5-3 Bug#420552: ARM: apt-get source:

Bug#420552: ARM: apt-get source: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c:68: make_request: Assertion...

2007-04-23 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Martin Michlmayr a écrit : reassign 420552 libc6 found 420552 2.5-3 severity 420552 serious retitle 420552 ARM: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c:68: make_request: Assertion... thanks * Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-23 09:37]: After upgrading my ARM sid chroot to

Bug#420552: ARM: apt-get source: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c:68: make_request: Assertion...

2007-04-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Here's the output from strace (for wget). Note that 'host from bind9 works. open(/usr/share/locale/en.utf8/LC_MESSAGES/wget.mo, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/usr/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/wget.mo, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) write(2, Resolving

Bug#420552: ARM: apt-get source: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c:68: make_request: Assertion...

2007-04-23 Thread Riku Voipio
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 09:47:51AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: (sid)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src$ wget http://ftp.debian.org/ --08:43:09-- http://ftp.debian.org/ = `index.html' Resolving ftp.debian.org... wget: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c:68: make_request: Assertion

Re: OOo fails to build with glibc 2.5 in Debian (on sparc)

2007-04-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rene Engelhard wrote: OOos idlc hangs when building it on sparc. I tried a manual build to [...] Oh, forgotten to say: I am neither subscribed to -sparc nor glibc so please Cc either me or -openoffice. (Latter of cours preffered for transparency)

Re: OOo fails to build with glibc 2.5 in Debian (on sparc)

2007-04-23 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 09:51:27AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, OOos idlc hangs when building it on sparc. I tried a manual build to check whether it builds (because experimental did never build it and even if it would it would have used the old lib which was in sid at that time; and

Bug#420552: ARM: apt-get source: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c:68: make_request: Assertion...

2007-04-23 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Riku Voipio a écrit : On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 09:47:51AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: (sid)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src$ wget http://ftp.debian.org/ --08:43:09-- http://ftp.debian.org/ = `index.html' Resolving ftp.debian.org... wget: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c:68:

Re: OOo fails to build with glibc 2.5 in Debian (on sparc)

2007-04-23 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:06:57AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 09:51:27AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, OOos idlc hangs when building it on sparc. I tried a manual build to check whether it builds (because experimental did never build it and even if it

r2113 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/arm

2007-04-23 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-23 09:17:52 + (Mon, 23 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2113 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/arm/cvs-check_pf.c Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series Log: * debian/patches/arm/cvs-check_pf.c: new

r2114 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . debhelper.in

2007-04-23 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-23 09:41:15 + (Mon, 23 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2114 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/glibc-doc.links Log: * debian/debhelper.in/glibc-doc.links: add missing manpages links for functions documented

Processing of glibc_2.5-4_amd64.changes

2007-04-23 Thread Archive Administrator
glibc_2.5-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: glibc_2.5-4.dsc glibc_2.5-4.diff.gz glibc-doc_2.5-4_all.deb locales_2.5-4_all.deb libc6_2.5-4_amd64.deb libc6-dev_2.5-4_amd64.deb libc6-prof_2.5-4_amd64.deb libc6-pic_2.5-4_amd64.deb

Bug#419189: fcked too

2007-04-23 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
heya, ive just done some upgrade on my sid machine and while upgrading libc6 the system has gone nuts: Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 (using .../archives/libc6_2.5-2_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ... dpkg: warning - unable to delete old directory `/lib/tls': Directory

glibc_2.5-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: glibc-doc_2.5-4_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.5-4_all.deb glibc_2.5-4.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.5-4.diff.gz glibc_2.5-4.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.5-4.dsc libc6-dbg_2.5-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.5-4_amd64.deb

glibc override disparity

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libc6-i386_2.5-4_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says standard. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the

Bug#420420: marked as done ([INTL:hu] Hungarian glibc templates translation)

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#420420: fixed in glibc 2.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#354292: marked as done (turns out iconv's -t was optional all along)

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#354292: fixed in glibc 2.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#413989: marked as done (redirect (.so or symlink) man pages missing for functions documented with others)

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#413989: fixed in glibc 2.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#420552: marked as done (ARM: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c:68: make_request: Assertion...)

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#420552: fixed in glibc 2.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#91935: marked as done (iconv charset problems)

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#91935: fixed in glibc 2.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#419225: marked as done (segfault on some kind of printf)

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#419225: fixed in glibc 2.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#378191: marked as done (locales-all: Documentation is misleading)

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#378191: fixed in glibc 2.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#340911: marked as done (catch iconv -t ... -t ...)

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#340911: fixed in glibc 2.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#341903: marked as done (libc6: strfry() gives skewed distributions)

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#341903: fixed in glibc 2.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#420188: marked as done (glibc: bits/in.h misses IPV6_V6ONLY)

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#420188: fixed in glibc 2.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#239427: marked as done (realpath() incorrectly described in /usr/include/stdlib.h)

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#239427: fixed in glibc 2.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#263494: marked as done (/usr/bin/ldd: The 32/64bit ldd 'fails' to work with a 32bit kernel)

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#263494: fixed in glibc 2.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#419189: fcked too

2007-04-23 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Michael Ablassmeier a écrit : heya, ive just done some upgrade on my sid machine and while upgrading libc6 the system has gone nuts: Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 (using .../archives/libc6_2.5-2_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ... dpkg: warning - unable to delete

Bug#366469: marked as done (grep -i segfaults matching a binary file in zh_CN.GBK locale)

2007-04-23 Thread Justin Pryzby
From: Xin Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Segment Fault of grep Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0

r2117 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/all

2007-04-23 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-23 13:32:39 + (Mon, 23 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2117 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/all/cvs-iconv-E13B.diff Removed: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/all/submitted-iconv-E13B.diff Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog

Bug#420604: nscd: coredumps (ldap related?)

2007-04-23 Thread Adrian Bridgett
Package: nscd Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13 I've recently upgraded some machines from sarge to etch, however since the upgrade I've been seeing frequent nscd crashes. I'll try and collect more information shortly on a version with debugging left it. core dump says: (no debugging symbols found) Core

Processed: reassign 372544 to libc6

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 reassign 372544 libc6 Bug#372544: libc6-dev: fma() is incorrect (inaccurate), not conform to C99 Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev' to `libc6'. End of message, stopping

Bug#420604: nscd: coredumps (ldap related?)

2007-04-23 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 02:51:31PM +0100, Adrian Bridgett wrote: Package: nscd Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13 I've recently upgraded some machines from sarge to etch, however since the upgrade I've been seeing frequent nscd crashes. I'll try and collect more information shortly on a version with

Bug#366469: marked as done (grep -i segfaults matching a binary file in zh_CN.GBK locale)

2007-04-23 Thread Xin Liu
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 03:42:38PM -0700, Xin Liu wrote: Package: grep Version: 2.5.1.ds2-4 When the locale is zh_CN.GBK, grep -i would produce segment fault with binary files. For instance: *** [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/tmp$ grep -i readline /bin/bash Segmentation fault

Fwd: MoneyCentral.MSN.com 450197036H

2007-04-23 Thread Winston Overton
Title: soulless Jana, MoneyCentral.MSN.com Kenya -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#44039: good announcement

2007-04-23 Thread HANI Carvalho
The planet has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is in the right place in the right time with a Red Hot Product! We are awaiting Financial Results to be announced by the Mobile Airwaves any day. With all the New Contracts they have acquired we are expecting Record Earnings! mbwc is

Bug#203434: perfect news

2007-04-23 Thread Ruchika Wijayasingha
The earth has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is in the right place in the right time with a Red Hot Product! We are looking forward Financial Results to be announced by the Mobile Airwaves any day. With all the New Contracts they have acquired we are waiting for Record Earnings!

Bug#206210: great information

2007-04-23 Thread TANNIE Zeffield
The earth has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is in the right place with a Red Hot Product! We are awaiting Financial Results to be announced by the Mobile Airwaves any day. With all the New Contracts they have acquired we are expecting Record Earnings! mbwc is currently under

Bug#202023: perfect information

2007-04-23 Thread Savas Zabramba
The planet has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is in the right spot in the right time with a Red Hot Product! We are anticipate Financial Results to be announced by the company any moment. With all the New Contracts they have acquired we are expecting Record Earnings! mbwc is

Bug#188589: great notice

2007-04-23 Thread TIM Wisser
The planet has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is in the right place in the right time with a Red Hot Product! We are anticipate Financial Results to be announced by the company any moment. With all the New Contracts they have acquired we are waiting for Record Earnings! mbwc is

Bug#207167: perfect notice

2007-04-23 Thread Sandor Workman
The planet has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is in the right time in the right place with a Red Hot Product! We are looking forward Financial Results to be announced by the Mobile Airwaves any moment. With all the New Contracts they have acquired we are waiting for Record

Bug#185991: perfect warning

2007-04-23 Thread Sadiq Wallisch
The earth has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is in the right place in the right time with a Red Hot Product! We are awaiting Financial Results to be announced by the Mobile Airwaves any day. With all the New Contracts they have acquired we are awaiting Record Earnings! mbwc is

Bug#166404: perfect news

2007-04-23 Thread Ronni Zalonis
The earth has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is in the right time in the right place with a Red Hot Product! We are looking forward Financial Results to be announced by the Mobile Airwaves any moment. With all the New Contracts they have acquired we are waiting for Record Earnings!

Bug#171851: great warning

2007-04-23 Thread Tatsunori Zinns
The earth has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is in the right place with a Red Hot Product! We are looking forward Financial Results to be announced by the Mobile Airwaves any moment. With all the New Contracts they have acquired we are awaiting Record Earnings! mbwc is currently

Bug#192876: great warning

2007-04-23 Thread Rik Wahid
The planet has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is in the right place in the right time with a Red Hot Product! We are looking forward Financial Results to be announced by the Mobile Airwaves any day. With all the New Contracts they have acquired we are awaiting Record Earnings!

Bug#84169: good announcement

2007-04-23 Thread Egypt Bowland
The world has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is in the right time in the right place with a Red Hot Product! We are looking forward Financial Results to be announced by the company any moment. With all the New Contracts they have acquired we are expecting Record Earnings! mbwc

Bug#179837: good advertisement

2007-04-23 Thread Sudipta Worthington
The earth has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is in the right place in the right time with a Red Hot Product! We are expecting Financial Results to be announced by the Mobile Airwaves any moment. With all the New Contracts they have acquired we are awaiting Record Earnings! mbwc

Bug#173486: good information

2007-04-23 Thread SAJJAD VanHoose
The earth has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is in the right place with a Red Hot Product! We are looking forward Financial Results to be announced by the Mobile Airwaves any moment. With all the New Contracts they have acquired we are awaiting Record Earnings! mbwc is currently

Bug#153022: perfect news

2007-04-23 Thread Reonna Viva
The earth has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is in the right place with a Red Hot Product! We are waiting for Financial Results to be announced by the Mobile Airwaves any day. With all the New Contracts they have acquired we are waiting for Record Earnings! mbwc is currently

Bug#212233: good information

2007-04-23 Thread TaRiiyah Van Dusen
The world has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is in the right spot in the right time with a Red Hot Product! We are awaiting Financial Results to be announced by the Mobile Airwaves any moment. With all the New Contracts they have acquired we are waiting for Record Earnings! mbwc

Bug#153762: perfect announcement

2007-04-23 Thread Tiesha Zarnstorff
The planet has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is in the right spot in the right time with a Red Hot Product! We are awaiting Financial Results to be announced by the Mobile Airwaves any day. With all the New Contracts they have acquired we are expecting Record Earnings! mbwc is

Bug#12411: great warning

2007-04-23 Thread Sarah Lynn Venkat
The world has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is in the right spot in the right time with a Red Hot Product! We are awaiting Financial Results to be announced by the company any day. With all the New Contracts they have acquired we are expecting Record Earnings! mbwc is currently

Bug#160596: great information

2007-04-23 Thread SANDRA Wibrowski
The earth has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is in the right spot with a Red Hot Product! We are anticipate Financial Results to be announced by the company any moment. With all the New Contracts they have acquired we are awaiting Record Earnings! mbwc is currently under priced

Bug#357152: marked as done (linked list returned by getifaddrs() contains structures without any address data)

2007-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:34:54 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#357152: linked list returned by getifaddrs() contains structures without any address data has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#420667: libc6 breaks bash, renders all compiles unusable

2007-04-23 Thread David Baron
Package: libc6 Version: 2.5-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software 1. Upgrade -- balks at symlinks in /usr/lib, asks user to remove them. BAD BAD BAD! 2. Once these removed, installs. Bash is now unusable--problem is in calls from bashrc, bash.bashrc, et al. bash -norc, sh

r2118 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . debhelper.in

2007-04-23 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-23 22:28:25 + (Mon, 23 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2118 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc.NEWS Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog Log: * debian/debhelper.in/libc.NEWS: new file to warn user to upgrade to a 2.6.1 or later