Re: Bug#666391: valgrind: 64-bit valgrind can not run 32-bit binary due to missing/incorrect debug symbols

On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 05:37:54PM +0200, Sebastian Rasmussen wrote: I have problems running 32-bit binaries in my 64-bit valgrind, however this likely a bug related to eglibc or possibly in how valgrind depends on eglibc's packages. I expect that both 32-bit and 64-bit binaries can be run

Re: Bug#666391: valgrind: 64-bit valgrind can not run 32-bit binary due to missing/incorrect debug symbols

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:47:14AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 05:37:54PM +0200, Sebastian Rasmussen wrote: I have problems running 32-bit binaries in my 64-bit valgrind, however this likely a bug related to eglibc or possibly in how valgrind depends on eglibc's

Bug#667023: src:eglibc: please provide a binary package for the x32 sub architecture on amd64

Package: src:eglibc Version: 2.13-27 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Blocks: 667005 gcc-4.7 and binutils (2.22) already provide support for the x32 abi. The missing piece to producing x32 binaries is a c library. Patches are available at git://github.com/hjl-tools/glibc.git. An aspect that makes

Processed: block 667005 with 667023

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 667005 with 667023 Bug #667005 [gcc-4.7-multilib] gcc-4.7-multilib: fails to find libgcc when linking a x32 binary 667005 was not blocked by any bugs. 667005 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 667005: 667023 thanks

Processed: severity of 667023 is wishlist

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 667023 wishlist Bug #667023 [src:eglibc] src:eglibc: please provide a binary package for the x32 sub architecture on amd64 Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: block 667023 with 667005

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 667023 with 667005 Bug #667023 [src:eglibc] src:eglibc: please provide a binary package for the x32 sub architecture on amd64 667023 was not blocked by any bugs. 667023 was blocking: 667005 Added blocking bug(s) of 667023: 667005 thanks

Bug#667023: src:eglibc: please provide a binary package for the x32 sub architecture on amd64

Le 03/04/2012 15:02, Helmut Grohne a écrit : Package: src:eglibc Version: 2.13-27 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Blocks: 667005 gcc-4.7 and binutils (2.22) already provide support for the x32 abi. The missing piece to producing x32 binaries is a c library. Patches are available at

Bug#666774: eglibc: Updated hppa patch set for version 2.13

tag 666774 - moreinfo thanks Le 02/04/2012 13:57, John David Anglin a écrit : On 2-Apr-12, at 4:40 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: tag 666774 + moreinfo thanks Le 01/04/2012 20:48, Dave Anglin a écrit : Source: eglibc Version: 2.13-27 Severity: important Tags: patch The following five

Processed: Re: Bug#666774: eglibc: Updated hppa patch set for version 2.13

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 666774 - moreinfo Bug #666774 [src:eglibc] eglibc: Updated hppa patch set for version 2.13 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 666774:

Bug#666774: eglibc: Updated hppa patch set for version 2.13

On 4/3/2012 9:31 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: tag 666774 - moreinfo thanks Le 02/04/2012 13:57, John David Anglin a écrit : On 2-Apr-12, at 4:40 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: tag 666774 + moreinfo thanks Le 01/04/2012 20:48, Dave Anglin a écrit : Source: eglibc Version: 2.13-27 Severity:

Processed: block 667023 with 667037

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 667023 with 667037 Bug #667023 [src:eglibc] src:eglibc: please provide a binary package for the x32 sub architecture on amd64 667023 was blocked by: 667005 667023 was blocking: 667005 Added blocking bug(s) of 667023: 667037 thanks Stopping