On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:59:34AM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 08:43:07AM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > >>>>> "Simon" == Simon McVittie writes:
[..]
> > Simon> However, even with both of those, i
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 08:43:07AM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Simon" == Simon McVittie writes:
[..]
> Simon> I am unsure whether there is consensus that "the result of
> Simon> gethostname() resolves to some address of the local machine"
> Simon> is also a reasonable
* Helmut Grohne [240603 23:11]:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 03:14:59PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Since noble includes these changes and I'd get this done sooner rather
> > than later, how about moving forward with June 5th after 22:30 UTC (such
> > that all buildds have regenerated their
* Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues [240520 07:35]:
> [..] But maybe it [glibc's postinst] should be doing some
> more involved checks about what PID 1 is? It could then make sure to only call
> systemd telinit if systemd is pid 1. [..]
Well, that would probably suck. Putting the knowledge when
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 11:12:35PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 06:04:38PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 May 2024 18:42:17 +0200 Helmut Grohne
> > wrote:
> > > the init process should handle SIGTERM more like an init system would
> > handle that
fixed 1070666 glibc/2.38-7
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:46:28PM +0300, Eugene Berdnikov wrote:
> Installation of util-linux 2.40.1-1 (and accompanied libmount1,
> libuuid1, libblkid1, libsmartcols1 of the same version) solves
> the problem, output of "last" is correct.
Thanks for
Hi Eugene,
could you please try again with:
util-linux 2.40.1-1
glibc 2.38-7 or newer
and report back, if the problem is fixed for you?
The newer util-linux is rebuilt against the fixed glibc, so it
hopefully is now fine. It might be necessary to delete your old
utmp/lastlog files tho.
Chris
Control: reassign 1070666 glibc
Control: affects 1070666 util-linux
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 11:51:50PM +0300, Eugene Berdnikov wrote:
> Upgrade of util-linux from 2.39.3-6 to 2.40-8 on i386 systems breaks
> last(1), while the same upgrade on amd64 systems does not break it.
> Examples on my
Hi Helmut,
speaking with my util-linux in Debian hat...
* Helmut Grohne [230912 20:16]:
[..]
> I request that affected maintainers reply to this mail:
> * Are you ok with the proposed changes in principle?
>+ Moving all files from / to /usr leaving no files in aliased
> locations
>
Control: reassign -1 glibc
Dear glibc Maintainers,
this bug appears to be an upgrade issue where (old versions?) of
libc6 might have done something wrong. Maybe you can decide what to
do with/about this bug.
It does not look like openssh-server would be the right place to fix
anything about it.
10 matches
Mail list logo
