Bug#568913: depends on nonexistent glibc-2.11-1

2010-02-10 Thread jidanni
Well now everything is OK, # apt-cache policy locales locales: Installed: 2.11-0exp4 Candidate: 2.11-0exp4 Version table: *** 2.11-0exp4 0 990 http://ftp.tw.debian.org experimental/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.10.2-5 0 500 http://ftp.tw.debian.org

Bug#568913: depends on nonexistent glibc-2.11-1

2010-02-10 Thread Florian Weimer
Package: locales Now there are TWO experimental packages. # apt-cache policy locales locales: Installed: 2.10.2-5 Candidate: 2.11-0exp4 Version table: 2.11-0exp4 0 990 http://ftp.tw.debian.org experimental/main Packages 2.11-0exp2 0 990

Bug#568913: depends on nonexistent glibc-2.11-1

2010-02-08 Thread jidanni
Package: locales Now there are TWO experimental packages. # apt-cache policy locales locales: Installed: 2.10.2-5 Candidate: 2.11-0exp4 Version table: 2.11-0exp4 0 990 http://ftp.tw.debian.org experimental/main Packages 2.11-0exp2 0 990 http://ftp.tw.debian.org

Bug#568913: depends on nonexistent glibc-2.11-1

2010-02-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 05:09:22AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: AJ This package is provided by libc6, see: AJ http://packages.debian.org/experimental/glibc-2.11-1 Yes, that is very nice, but I am sorry to inform you that not all the dependencies are in place to work with a sources.list

Bug#568913: depends on nonexistent glibc-2.11-1

2010-02-08 Thread jidanni
AJ == Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes: AJ On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 05:09:22AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: AJ This package is provided by libc6, see: AJ http://packages.debian.org/experimental/glibc-2.11-1 Yes, that is very nice, but I am sorry to inform you that not all the