El 1 d’abril de 2012 0:02, Robert Millan r...@debian.org ha escrit:
I will test older kernels and port it to amd64.
I added backward compatibility for kfreebsd-8.x. Tested with 8.1,
8.3~ and 9.0. In all cases it passes the full tst-timer* testsuite.
This is an improvement over tst-timer4 and
El 31 de març de 2012 1:16, Robert Millan r...@debian.org ha escrit:
Somewhat. My latest patch (after fixing other problems [1]) now
passes tst-timer [2], but only *sometimes* (looks like a race). I
isolated my code into a standalone app by renaming the timer_*
functions and found that when
El 30 de març de 2012 9:11, Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz ha escrit:
/* Signal needed for the kernel-supported POSIX timer implementation.
We can reuse the cancellation signal since we can distinguish
cancellation from timer expirations. */
#define SIGTIMER SIGCANCEL
Are
El 26 de març de 2012 0:14, Robert Millan r...@debian.org ha escrit:
9.0/i386 kernel running i386 binary - GOOD
10.0/i386 kernel running i386 binary - GOOD
Sorry but my i386 tests were wrong, I did them while using unpatched
libc (sigh). Here are some proper tests for i386 (same result using
Hi!
Robert Millan r...@debian.org writes:
Attached patch adds a new implementation of timers for kFreeBSD. It
is heavily based on the Linux/NPTL counterpart.
I've verified that this fixes #642112 (timer_settime fails on kfreebsd
when timeout approaches max(time_t)) and #662018 (No support
Hi!
Robert Millan r...@debian.org writes:
El 25 de març de 2012 21:28, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org ha escrit:
It fails some regression tests on eglibc, is that on purpose?
For tst-timer* I got the same failures with sid chroot on kfreebsd
8.1, however they work fine with
El 25 de març de 2012 21:28, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org ha escrit:
It fails some regression tests on eglibc, is that on purpose?
For tst-timer* I got the same failures with sid chroot on kfreebsd
8.1, however they work fine with kfreebsd-10.
I don't have kfreebsd 8.3 and 9.0 handy atm
El 25 de març de 2012 23:20, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org ha escrit:
My run was on latest kfreebsd-9 kernel from sid. I can test on my 8.3
systems later, though we'll need to get this working on 8.1 as that's
what the buildds are running.
Sorry I got confused. It works on all versions
El 26 de març de 2012 0:14, Robert Millan r...@debian.org ha escrit:
Sorry I got confused. It works on all versions when it is built with
i386 libc.
I think I know why, but can't fix it right now. timer_t is abused to
store a pointer, but its size is only int32_t.
timer_create() sets it
Hi!
Robert Millan r...@debian.org writes:
El 25 de març de 2012 23:20, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org ha escrit:
My run was on latest kfreebsd-9 kernel from sid. I can test on my 8.3
systems later, though we'll need to get this working on 8.1 as that's
what the buildds are running.
Hi,
Attached patch adds a new implementation of timers for kFreeBSD. It
is heavily based on the Linux/NPTL counterpart.
I've verified that this fixes #642112 (timer_settime fails on kfreebsd
when timeout approaches max(time_t)) and #662018 (No support for
CLOCK_MONOTONIC). It also addresses a
11 matches
Mail list logo
