On 2012-06-02 21:56 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 09:33:19PM +0200, Thibaut Girka wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 09:02:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Your patch actually also makes libc0.1-dev, libc0.3-dev and libc6.1-dev
m-a: same. You should also check for files
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 10:10:41AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2012-06-02 21:56 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 09:33:19PM +0200, Thibaut Girka wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 09:02:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Your patch actually also makes libc0.1-dev,
On 2012-06-03 10:39 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 10:10:41AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2012-06-02 21:56 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Either we have to make them conflict one with another (that is
libc0.1-dev and libc6-dev, libc0.3-dev with libc6-dev, etc.),
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 11:08:13AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2012-06-03 10:39 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 10:10:41AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2012-06-02 21:56 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Either we have to make them conflict one with another (that is
tags 666760 patch
thanks
Hi,
I was wondering why libc6-dev wasn't m-a: same, and I've decided to identify
which files
are arch-dependent but not in arch-qualified paths.
Here is what I've found using libc6-dev=2.13-32 binary packages from the
archive:
Searching for conflicts across the
tag 666760 - patch
thanks
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 04:36:03PM +0200, Thibaut Girka wrote:
tags 666760 patch
thanks
Hi,
I was wondering why libc6-dev wasn't m-a: same, and I've decided to identify
which files
are arch-dependent but not in arch-qualified paths.
Here is what I've found
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 666760 - patch
Bug #666760 [libc6-dev] [libc6-dev] Make libc6-dev multiarch-installable
Removed tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
666760:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 09:02:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Your patch actually also makes libc0.1-dev, libc0.3-dev and libc6.1-dev
m-a: same. You should also check for files in these packages.
Oh, I didn't know about that.
libc0.1-dev is ok.
libc0.3-dev is ok since it's only available for
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 09:33:19PM +0200, Thibaut Girka wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 09:02:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Your patch actually also makes libc0.1-dev, libc0.3-dev and libc6.1-dev
m-a: same. You should also check for files in these packages.
Oh, I didn't know about that.
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.13-27
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
I'd like to install zlib1g-dev:i386 to use zlib in a 32bit program. However,
this is currently blocked by libc6-dev not being Multi-Arch: same, so I can
not install it.
--- System information.
10 matches
Mail list logo
