> "AJ" == Aurelien Jarno writes:
AJ> No, that simply doesn't scale. Other packages than the one in src:glibc
AJ> depends on libc6 >= 2.26, and more and more are going to pick up this
AJ> dependency in the next months. They might also be unpacked before libc6
AJ> preinst
On 2018-01-23 19:56, James Cloos wrote:
> AJ> Do you have a list of other packages from the glibc src that are
> AJ> upgraded before?
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libc-dev-bin : Depends: libc6 (> 2.26) but 2.25-6 is installed
> libc6-dev : Depends: libc6 (= 2.26-4) but
AJ> Do you have a list of other packages from the glibc src that are
AJ> upgraded before?
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libc-dev-bin : Depends: libc6 (> 2.26) but 2.25-6 is installed
libc6-dev : Depends: libc6 (= 2.26-4) but 2.25-6 is installed
libc6-i386 : Depends: libc6 (=
On 2018-01-23 17:57, James Cloos wrote:
> > "AJ" == Aurelien Jarno writes:
>
> AJ> It's exactly what the message does. It stopped the upgrade and prevented
> AJ> libc6 to be unpacked. That way your system is still usable.
>
> But that is NOT what the message does. The
> "AJ" == Aurelien Jarno writes:
AJ> It's exactly what the message does. It stopped the upgrade and prevented
AJ> libc6 to be unpacked. That way your system is still usable.
But that is NOT what the message does. The other debs from the glibc
source are already
On 2018-01-23 17:17, James Cloos wrote:
> > "AJ" == Aurelien Jarno writes:
>
> AJ> This is perfectly normal that you do no get a dialog asking wether you
> AJ> want to upgrade libc6, as your kernel is too old for that.
>
> Not it is not normal. It still should have
> "AJ" == Aurelien Jarno writes:
AJ> This is perfectly normal that you do no get a dialog asking wether you
AJ> want to upgrade libc6, as your kernel is too old for that.
Not it is not normal. It still should have given that dialog so that I
could skip libc and its
On 2018-01-23 20:04, cl...@jhcloos.com wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.26-4
> Severity: important
>
> [Reporting this from a different box.]
>
> The latest libc upgrade again breaks openvz virtuals.
>
> On kvm/xen/bare you get a dialog asking whether you want to upgrade libc.
>
> On vz
Package: libc6
Version: 2.26-4
Severity: important
[Reporting this from a different box.]
The latest libc upgrade again breaks openvz virtuals.
On kvm/xen/bare you get a dialog asking whether you want to upgrade libc.
On vz you get a notice about the (un-upgradable) kernel version but
not the
9 matches
Mail list logo