Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 07:17:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#380195: fixed in glibc 2.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 07:17:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#421555: fixed in glibc 2.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 07:17:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#421555: fixed in glibc 2.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 07:17:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#421882: fixed in glibc 2.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 07:17:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#380195: fixed in glibc 2.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 07:17:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#421882: fixed in glibc 2.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 07:17:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#422067: fixed in glibc 2.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 07:17:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#421882: fixed in glibc 2.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: libc6
Version: 2.5-5
Severity: minor
# This script is existed for detecting depreciated kernel version to
# check glibc incompatibility.
This should read This script exists for... or This script does exist for...
or if you need the past tense This script existed for... (however, that
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-05-07 09:21:41 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 2196
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/i386.mk
Log:
* debian/sysdeps/i386.mk: switch from --includir= to amd64_includedir.
Modified:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.5-6
Severity: normal
Hi,
there happens a segmentation fault with the following code:
#include stdio.h
int main(int argc, char**argv)
{
printf(%s\n, strerror(atoi(argv[1])));
}
I have observed this on amd64 libc6 2.5-5
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 12:02:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#422587: fixed in glibc 2.5-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: libc6
Version: 2.5-5
On x86_64, mostly debian etch. After upgrading libc6 to unstable, I
can no longer compile anything.
echo int main() {return 0;} test.c
gcc test.c
/lib/libc.so.6: file not recognized: File format not recognized
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Upgrading
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 14:45:34 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#422598: libc6: Segmentation fault in
printf()/vfprintf()/strlen()
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-05-07 12:41:07 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 2199
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/depflags.pl
Log:
* debian/sysdeps/depflags.pl: Add a conflicts on binutils
( 2.17cvs20070426-1) for libc-dev.
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 09:46 +, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-05-07 09:46:44 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 2197
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/local/etc_init.d/glibc.sh
Log:
*
16 matches
Mail list logo
