Re: Handling s390 libc ABI change in Debian

2014-07-15 Thread Philipp Kern
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:18:39AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: I can follow up with a list affected packages, but we are slowly discovering them one by one, so it might takes time. So far we have: * Mixing modules/libraries built with pre-2.19 and 2.19 libc - perl - libpng * Using libc

Re: Handling s390 libc ABI change in Debian

2014-07-15 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:14:42PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org wrote: glibc 2.19 has changed the libc ABI on s390, more specifically the

Re: Handling s390 libc ABI change in Debian

2014-07-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 09:21:30AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:18:39AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: I can follow up with a list affected packages, but we are slowly discovering them one by one, so it might takes time. So far we have: * Mixing modules/libraries

Re: Handling s390 libc ABI change in Debian

2014-07-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 03:49:04AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:14:42PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org wrote: glibc 2.19

Bug#754596: libc6 package upgrade sends ISO-2022 escape sequences to a terminal which doesn't support them (PuTTY in UTF-8 mode)

2014-07-15 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2014-07-12 23:30 +0200, Stephen Powell wrote: The problem occurs when libc6 must be upgraded during apt-get upgrade or apt-get dist-upgrade. I see a screen which looks like this: - lu Configuring libc6:s390x tk x Running services and

Bug#742640: src:eglibc: build stage2 without selinux

2014-07-15 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 09:46:05PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Hmm, the above has actually been removed in favor of a test on $(DEB_BUILD_PROFILES). Instead of duplicating the code, please test for both stage1 and stage2 in the same test. Updating patch addressing both concerns.