control: reaffect -1 adequate
control: retitle -1 adequate autopkgtests do not work with toolchains
defaulting to --as-needed
On 2021-02-10 12:17, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.31-9
> Severity: important
> Control: block 981899 with -1
>
> One of the adequate autopkg
Processing control commands:
> reaffect -1 adequate
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> retitle -1 adequate autopkgtests do not work with toolchains defaulting to
> --as-needed
Bug #982443 [libc6] libc6: Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-lookup.c: 111:
check_match: Assertion
Hi Helmut, Aurelien
On 8/26/20 2:16 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi Helmut,
>
> On 2020-08-26 17:43, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>> Hi Vineet,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:39:53PM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>> Following up as ARC glibc port was merged upstream in 2.32. Can we now give
>>>
Processing control commands:
> found -1 2.28-10
Bug #983479 [src:glibc] glibc: CVE-2021-27645: double-free in nscd
Marked as found in versions glibc/2.28-10.
> found -1 2.28-1
Bug #983479 [src:glibc] glibc: CVE-2021-27645: double-free in nscd
Marked as found in versions glibc/2.28-1.
--
983479:
Source: glibc
Version: 2.31-9
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream
Forwarded: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27462
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
,f...@debian.org
Control: found -1 2.28-10
Control: found -1 2.28-1
Hi,
The following vulnerability
Package: libc6-i386
Version: 2.31-9
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: neel...@gmail.com
I guess the (subject) ^^ is by mistake and not intentional. If that is indeed
the case, please fix the packaging so that a stripped library is installed as
expected.
Otherwise, please disregard this report and I
6 matches
Mail list logo