Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

2016-06-05 Thread Ximin Luo
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:11:25 +0200 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > It means that the point 3 (usage of __DATE__ and __TIME__) is the only > one left to address in the version currently in experimental. > Hi, GCC have now added support for SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH so we can use this

Bug#783210: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

2016-07-22 Thread Ximin Luo
Ximin Luo: > Aurelien Jarno: >> On 2016-06-06 02:48, Ximin Luo wrote: >>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:11:25 +0200 Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> >>> wrote: >>>> It means that the point 3 (usage of __DATE__ and __TIME__) is the only >

Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

2016-07-22 Thread Ximin Luo
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org +CC Mike Frysinger Aurelien Jarno: > On 2016-06-06 02:48, Ximin Luo wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:11:25 +0200 Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> >> wrote: >>> It means that the point 3 (usage of __DA

Bug#844420: FTBFS: tests fail on hosts without network access

2016-11-15 Thread Ximin Luo
in all cases and the test returns 2. . Normally, such systems can still resolve "localhost." via nsswitch/getent and getaddrinfo is not suppose to attempt resolution of "localhost." anyways. Author: Ximin Luo <infini...@debian.org> Bug: TBD --- This patch header follows DE

Bug#844420: FTBFS: tests fail on hosts without network access

2016-11-16 Thread Ximin Luo
Aurelien Jarno: > On 2016-11-15 16:00, Ximin Luo wrote: >> Package: glibc >> Version: 2.24-5 >> Severity: important >> Tags: upstream patch >> Forwarded: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20826 >> >> Dear Maintainer, >> &

Bug#844420: FTBFS: tests fail on hosts without network access

2016-11-17 Thread Ximin Luo
Aurelien Jarno: > On 2016-11-16 09:48, Ximin Luo wrote: >> Aurelien Jarno: >>> On 2016-11-15 16:00, Ximin Luo wrote: >>>> Package: glibc >>>> Version: 2.24-5 >>>> Severity: important >>>> Tags: upstream patch >>>> F

Bug#783210: [PATCH] nscd_stat.c: make the build reproducible

2016-11-04 Thread Ximin Luo
Mike Frysinger: > On 28 Jul 2016 15:15, Florian Weimer wrote: >> On 03/09/2016 05:30 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> would it be so terrible to properly marshall this data ? >> >> Ximin Luo and I discussed this and I wonder if it is possible to read >> out the

Bug#783210: [PATCH] nscd_stat.c: make the build reproducible

2016-11-04 Thread Ximin Luo
Ximin Luo: > Mike Frysinger: >> On 28 Jul 2016 15:15, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> On 03/09/2016 05:30 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>>> would it be so terrible to properly marshall this data ? >>> >>> Ximin Luo and I discussed this and I wonder if it is

Bug#847478: FTBFS: needs to Build-Depends on gperf

2016-12-08 Thread Ximin Luo
Package: glibc Version: 2.24-7 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, whilst trying to build glibc: /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 /tmp/debrepro.uGH5xEsmL1/build/source/build-tree/amd64-libc/gnu/lib-names-64.h

Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

2016-12-09 Thread Ximin Luo
- the upstream folks Aurelien Jarno: > On 2016-06-06 02:48, Ximin Luo wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:11:25 +0200 Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> >> wrote: >>> It means that the point 3 (usage of __DATE__ and __TIME__) is the only >>> one l

Bug#847596: locales-all non-deterministically generates either kk_KZ.PT154 or kk_KZ.RK1048 despite declaring support for both

2016-12-09 Thread Ximin Luo
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +glibc (2.24-7.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Try for reproducibility. + + -- Ximin Luo <infinity0@profitbricks-build17-amd64> Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:03:37 + + glibc (2.24-7) unstable; urgency=medium [ Samuel Thibault ] diff -Nru glib

Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

2016-12-19 Thread Ximin Luo
Aurelien Jarno: > [..] > > It would be nice to have an explanation why the changes from your patch > are needed. See my comments below. > > >> diff -Nru glibc-2.24/debian/rules glibc-2.24/debian/rules >> --- glibc-2.24/debian/rules 2016-11-25 21:59:04.0 + >> +++