Bug#861026: both kernel and glibc want s64 not long (s32)

2017-04-25 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Control: reassign -1 glibc-doc-reference On 2017-04-24 08:15, Martin Pitt wrote: > Control: retitle -1 fix documentation of struct timespec' tv_nsec type > The glibc package doesn't provide the documentation as it is non-free. I am therefore reassigning the bug to the corresponding package. --

Processed: Re: Bug#861026: both kernel and glibc want s64 not long (s32)

2017-04-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 glibc-doc-reference Bug #861026 [libc6-dev] fix documentation of struct timespec' tv_nsec type Bug reassigned from package 'libc6-dev' to 'glibc-doc-reference'. No longer marked as found in versions glibc/2.24-10. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions

Bug#861026: both kernel and glibc want s64 not long (s32)

2017-04-24 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: retitle -1 fix documentation of struct timespec' tv_nsec type Adam Borowski [2017-04-23 23:41 +0200]: > So no matter what we'd argue as being "correct", there's no changing the ABI > of an architecture that was finalized 5 years ago. Thus, all we can do is > having GNU folks document

Bug#861026: both kernel and glibc want s64 not long (s32)

2017-04-23 Thread Adam Borowski
> However, this is not. The documentation [2] defines struct timeval's "tv_nsec" > field as "long int", so %ld is correct. But glibc seems to really define it > as "__syscall_slong_t tv_nsec", and on x32 __syscall_slong_t appears to be > "long long int". > [2]