Re: GNOME Shell 46

On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 at 16:18:06 -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > The list of people who can accept magpie into Debian is small and I > have no estimate how long its review will take. I had been thinking that if magpie doesn't get through NEW by the time the time_t transition is out of the way, we

Re: Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition

On Sat, 02 Mar 2024 at 20:19:47 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > I have proposed a change for glib2.0/experimental at > https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glib/-/merge_requests/32 which > implements the "delete the old postrm" approach An equivalent glib2.0 change

Re: Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition

On Sat, 02 Mar 2024 at 20:19:47 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > I have proposed a change for glib2.0/experimental at > https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glib/-/merge_requests/32 which > implements the "delete the old postrm" approach. I've uploaded this to experimental, inc

Re: Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition

On Sat, 02 Mar 2024 at 20:19:50 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > I am currently downloading all versions of libglib2.0-0 that have > existed on amd64 as tracked by snapshot.d.o. My plan is to extract their > DEBIAN/postrm, import them into a git branch and go back through the > hist

Re: Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition

undreds of thousands of systems, the expectation is that I must not upload without sufficient testing. So, my intention is to do my best, and then invite other developers to take responsibility for a better, higher-version-numbered upload with different timing if they prefer. On Fri, 01 Mar 2024 at 1

Re: Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition

On Fri, 01 Mar 2024 at 13:21:51 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > > Possible solution: other ideas? > > Make glib2.0-t64 use a different cache filename? I'm not happy about the idea of introducing long-term divergence in the upstream code as a result of a Debian-specific packaging problem; I think

Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition

Package: tech-ctte Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-d...@lists.debian.org, debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org, vor...@debian.org I'm requesting advice from the tech-ctte (or anyone else with relevant knowledge, e.g. the dpkg team or the drivers of the time64 transition) on how to resolve

Re: build profile proposal: nogir (second try)

As Johannes mentioned earlier in this thread, the first piece of practical advice on nogir should be: if you don't know that you need to use it, then perhaps you shouldn't. It's primarily aimed at breaking cycles, and enabling buildability in lower-level packages during bootstrapping. (Having

Re: build profile proposal: nogir (second try)

On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 at 11:08:30 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 11:38:09PM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > > The only package where I'm sure that I intend to separate out the GIR > > XML in the short term is src:glib2.0 > > How annoying would it

Re: build profile proposal: nogir (second try)

On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 23:15:03 +0100, Matthias Geiger wrote: > Am 17.01.24 um 23:00 schrieb Simon McVittie: > > Public GIR XML (Foo-1.gir) is normally in the -dev package alongside the > > C headers, but recent versions of gobject-introspection define a canonical > > virtua

build profile proposal: nogir (second try)

Last year, Helmut Grohne proposed a nogir build profile to help with cross-compiling the GLib ecosystem: . After some discussion on #1030223, I have a revised proposal, with the same name but slightly different rules: profile name:

Bug#1055894: bookworm-pu: package gnome-session/43.0-1+deb12u1

t as a fallback, in Debian 13. + (Closes: #1055838) + + -- Simon McVittie Mon, 13 Nov 2023 18:34:53 + + gnome-session (43.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium [ Nathan Pratta Teodosio ] diff -Nru gnome-session-43.0/debian/gbp.conf gnome-session-43.0/debian/gbp.conf --- gnome-session-43.0/debian/g

Re: Bug#1053307: bullseye-pu: package glib2.0/2.66.8-1+deb11u1

On Sun, 01 Oct 2023 at 11:52:25 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > I would like to update glib2.0 in Debian 11.9. We're too close to the > 11.8 deadline for an update with this size of diffstat, so I'd like > to upload it to bullseye-proposed-updates shortly after 11.8 is out, > to give it

Re: Bug#1050237: transition: mutter/gnome-shell 45

I don't think this was cc'd to the release team when it was reassigned, so quoting full text below for the release team's reference: On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at 14:09:06 -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > We will be ready to do the GNOME Shell/Mutter 45 transition once > magpie is accepted from Debian NEW

Bug#1053307: bullseye-pu: package glib2.0/2.66.8-1+deb11u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye d-i User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: glib...@packages.debian.org, debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:glib2.0 I would like to update glib2.0 in Debian 11.9. We're too close

Bug#1052227: bookworm-pu (pre-approval): mutter/43.8-0+deb12u1

mutter#2602) +- Improve GNOME Shell app grid performance by avoiding repainting + monitors other than the one it is displayed on + (partially fixes gnome-shell#6819) +- Upstream CI adjustments not relevant to Debian +- All other changes were previously included in 43.7-1, 43.7-2 + * d/patc

Bug#1052090: gnome-shell-extension-bluetooth-quick-connect: needs update for GNOME Shell 45

Package: gnome-shell-extension-bluetooth-quick-connect Version: 36-2 Severity: serious Tags: trixie sid upstream Forwarded: https://github.com/bjarosze/gnome-bluetooth-quick-connect/issues/88 User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: gnome-shell-45 X-Debbugs-Cc:

Re: Is there any plans to update Nautilus in bookworm to 43.4?

On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 11:54:17 +0300, Eugene Romanenko wrote: > Is there any plans to update Nautilus in Debian 12 to version 43.4? > It appears to have fixes for the annoying crashes I'm experiencing in the > current 43.2-1 version. Please report those crashes as a bug if you haven't already.

Bug#1043144: transition: mutter/gnome-shell 44

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:mutter src:gnome-shell Control: block -1 by 1042980 It's about time we migrate GNOME Shell 44 to unstable. We

Bug#1043008: gnome-shell-extension-bluetooth-quick-connect: functionality mostly taken over by gnome-shell (>= 44)

Package: gnome-shell-extension-bluetooth-quick-connect Version: 36-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org The core functionality of gnome-shell-extension-bluetooth-quick-connect (connecting and disconnecting Bluetooth devices via the quick settings menu) is now present

Re: GNOME 43 updates for Debian 12

On Sat, 27 May 2023 at 11:28:49 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 15:33:16 -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > > Is anyone intending to work on packaging the GNOME 43 bugfix update > > for Debian 12, more specifically, for Debian 12.1? > > I think yes we s

Re: GNOME 43 updates for Debian 12

On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 15:33:16 -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > Is anyone intending to work on packaging the GNOME 43 bugfix update > for Debian 12, more specifically, for Debian 12.1? I think yes we should, most important packages first (Shell etc. above random leaf apps). I will try to do some of

Re: build profile proposal: nogir

On Sun, 16 Apr 2023 at 13:22:57 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > when adding new general build profiles, we're supposed to consult with > debian-devel. Thus I propose the "nogir" profile. This profile is > supposed to skip building "gir*" packages containing typelib files. Unfortunately, I don't

Re: GNOME 44 Beta for Debian experimental?

On Thu, 09 Feb 2023 at 08:22:20 -0500, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > For most apps, we won't have a need to do any more bookworm uploads. > Can we wait to fork a branch from the latest bookworm git release tag > until we actually need it, or are expected to need it? Sure, that seems reasonable to me. For

Re: Bug#1030683: gnome-shell-extensions-extra: unmaintainable

On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 13:12:35 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Assuming package dependencies ensure that a new gnome-shell will result > in removal of incompatible extensions (which they do, if extension maintainers package extensions the same way the GNOME team does) > a standalone src+bin

Re: Bug#1030683: gnome-shell-extensions-extra: unmaintainable

My understanding from the changelog is that the maintainer Daniel Baumann first packaged a bunch of GNOME Shell extensions according to the GNOME team's usual convention (one package per independent upstream project), and then was asked by the ftp team to replace them with a single package

Re: GNOME 44 Beta for Debian experimental?

On Thu, 09 Feb 2023 at 06:28:15 -0500, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > GNOME 44 Beta will be released in a few days. Is it ok to push GNOME > 44 stuff to Debian experimental? I think yes, but I'd like a branch from the last version intended for bookworm to exist first. We can either do debian/master +

Re: Bug#1018076: mini-transition: gjs built against mozjs102

On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 at 15:41:04 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Could you blacklist the test > > “ large-arraybuffers/basic.js” > > on all affected big-endian targets (powerpc, ppc64, sparc64)? > > The test is blacklist on s390x and fails on powerpc and ppc64 as well. I'm not

Re: Bug#1018076: mini-transition: gjs built against mozjs102

Control: retitle -1 mini-transition: gjs built against mozjs102 Control: unblock -1 by 1018819 Control: tags -1 = pending On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 11:19:30 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > I think we need to be looking at the possibility of doing > architecture-specific removals of gjs and dep

Bug#1018076: transition: gjs and gnome-shell likely to be removed from armel

Package: rele...@debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org The plan is for Debian 12 to release with GNOME 43, which is currently in beta upstream. Beta versions of

Re: Bug#1007245: gnome-control-center: Update to 42

On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 10:50:09 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > gnome-control-center 42 is a major update switching to GTK4. I'm > filing this bug so that we can track any blocker issues we find. Version 1:42.0-1 is in experimental now. Someone (I don't remember who, possibly Jeremy?) said that the

Re: Bug#1007906: transition: mutter

On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 at 15:27:12 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 17:21, Simon McVittie wrote: > > As usual, lots of Shell > > extensions are affected by API changes and will need porting or removal, > > but as usual, I think removing the affected Shell ex

Re: Bug#1007906: transition: mutter

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 12:00:56 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > As usual, this includes a libmutter ABI break, from libmutter-9-0 to > libmutter-10-0. Suitable versions of gnome-shell and budgie-desktop are > already available in experimental. The GNOME team

Re: Bug#1007905: transition: icu

On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 at 09:28:49 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 06:05:38PM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Obviously all these copies of essentially the same codebase are quite > > unfortunate, but mozjs and ICU seem to be sufficiently tightly-coupled > &g

Bug#1007906: transition: mutter

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-mutter.html X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org Tags: moreinfo GNOME 42 is due for release next week (2022-03-23).

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org, i...@packages.debian.org Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-icu.html Tags: moreinfo icu has a new upstream

Bug#1007001: bullseye-pu: package gtk+3.0/3.24.24-4+deb11u2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org, debian-print...@lists.debian.org, debian-desk...@lists.debian.org Control: block -1 by 1005694 Control: block 982925 by -1

Bug#1006960: icu: new upstream release 70.1

Source: icu Version: 67.1-7 Severity: wishlist Control: fixed -1 70.1-2 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org icu has a new upstream version in experimental, which is needed by src:mozjs91, and indirectly by updated versions of gjs and gnome-shell. Do you have a timescale in mind for a

Request for testing: GTK for bullseye with improved CUPS printing support

I have been looking into two GTK merge requests [!6] and [!9], trying to figure out which one is the better candidate for a bullseye stable update. [!6]: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gtk3/-/merge_requests/6 [!9]: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gtk3/-/merge_requests/9 This is an

Bug#1005694: bullseye-pu: package gtk+3.0/3.24.24-4+deb11u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org [ Reason ] User request in #976334 [ Impact ] Typeahead search in the file chooser (File -> Save As... dialog) doesn't work on

Bug#996607: transition: mutter and GNOME Shell 41 (libmutter-9)

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-mutter.html I know it only seems like yesterday that we did the mutter 40

Re: Bug#994710: bullseye-pu: package nautilus/3.38.2-1+deb11u1

On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 at 11:08:49 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > It seems #994710 didn't make it to the list because the diff was too big. > Here's another try, removing the translation updates from the diff. ... now with diff. Sorry, not enough coffee yet this morning... Diff filtered to e

Re: Bug#994710: bullseye-pu: package nautilus/3.38.2-1+deb11u1

It seems #994710 didn't make it to the list because the diff was too big. Here's another try, removing the translation updates from the diff. [ Reason ] User request in #993137. While I was looking at this package, I also applied maintenance changes from upstream's 3.38.x branch. [ Impact ] If

Bug#994709: bullseye-pu: package gnome-maps/3.38.6-0+deb11u1

+1,27 @@ +gnome-maps (3.38.6-0+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * d/control.in, d/gbp.conf, d/watch: Target 3.38.x for bullseye + * New upstream stable release +- Fix a bug where place details get lost after searching again for + the same place +- Avoid dark-mode background p

Re: Bug#993934: transition: libgweather

On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 at 15:45:41 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Now that gnome-shell 40 is in testing, I think it might be time to do > the libgweather transition. Since we only have one experimental suite, which already contains unrelated GNOME changes (mainly a SONAME bump for evolutio

Re: Bug#993934: transition: libgweather

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Wed, 08 Sep 2021 at 10:53:24 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > libgweather has behaviour changes that required versioned Breaks on various > packages. Please see > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992870#12 for more > details. Now that gn

Re: transition: GNOME 40 (libmutter-8-0 and friends)

Control: severity -1 serious On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 at 13:52:40 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > as usual various third-party extensions will need either updating, or > temporarily removing from testing I've now uploaded gnome-shell 40 to unstable, so gnome-shell extensions incomp

Bug#993945: transition: evolution-data-server

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: moreinfo User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-evolution-data-server.html Control: block -1 by 992870 Control:

Bug#993934: transition: libgweather

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org Control: block -1 by 992870 libgweather has behaviour changes that required versioned Breaks on various packages. Please see

Bug#993922: amtk: abandoned upstream

Source: amtk Version: 5.2.0-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream wontfix X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org Control: block -1 by 993909 User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: oldlibs unmaintained-upstream amtk has been frozen and archived upstream, and

Re: Bug#992870: transition: GNOME 40 (libmutter-8-0 and friends)

On Sun, 05 Sep 2021 at 23:56:23 +, Paul Flaherty wrote: > I am wondering if we can do a transition on gnome web I think you are misunderstanding what is being tracked in #992870. GNOME Web in Debian is the epiphany-browser package, which is already at version 40 in testing/unstable. > and

Re: Bug#992870: transition: GNOME 40 (libmutter-8-0 and friends)

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo I think we're ready for the libmutter-8-0 / gnome-shell transition when the release team is. On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 at 13:52:40 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Non-transition blockers that need to be uploaded in advance: > > - wayland-protocols (from experime

Bug#993656: bullseye-pu: package mutter/3.38.6-2~deb11u1

log mutter-3.38.6/debian/changelog --- mutter-3.38.4/debian/changelog 2021-03-17 09:52:33.0 + +++ mutter-3.38.6/debian/changelog 2021-09-01 21:25:34.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,44 @@ +mutter (3.38.6-2~deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * Rebuild for bullseye + + -- Simon McVittie Wed, 0

Bug#993655: bullseye-pu: package gnome-shell/3.38.6-1~deb11u1

nome-shell-3.38.6/debian/changelog --- gnome-shell-3.38.4/debian/changelog 2021-03-17 09:52:47.0 + +++ gnome-shell-3.38.6/debian/changelog 2021-09-01 21:18:10.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,37 @@ +gnome-shell (3.38.6-1~deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * Rebuild for bullseye + + -- Simo

Re: Bug#992870: transition: GNOME 40 (libmutter-8-0 and friends)

On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 at 22:22:48 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > It looks as though we should be able to limit the libmutter-8-0 transition > to just this cluster of packages. Almost this. Non-transition blockers that need to be uploaded in advance: - wayland-protocols (from experimenta

Re: Bug#992870: transition: GNOME 40 (libmutter-8-0 and friends)

On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 at 05:07:14 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > There is one transition that we could do before gnome-shell and > friends and before libgweather: tracker. > > I filed https://bugs.debian.org/993052 for the transition. We can take > gnome-panel & gnome-applets 41 beta from

Re: Bug#992870: transition: GNOME 40 (libmutter-8-0 and friends)

On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 at 15:23:24 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Core packages: > > - gsettings-desktop-schemas (must go first) > - gnome-settings-daemon > - gnome-control-center > - mutter > - gnome-shell > - gnome-desktop3 > - this one is not strictly versioned,

Bug#992907: gtk4: release to unstable

Source: gtk4 Version: 4.4.0+ds1-1 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org Control: block -1 by 992857 Control: block -1 by 991964 Control: block -1 by 992906 We should get gtk4 into testing/unstable during the bookworm cycle. Until a new 4.6.x stable branch starts, I

Bug#992906: pango1.0: New upstream release 1.48.x

Source: pango1.0 Version: 1.46.2-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: fixed-upstream bookworm sid X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org Control: fixed -1 1.48.9+ds1-1 We should get pango1.0/1.48.x ready for unstable. This is a blocker for the upload of GTK 4 to unstable. Have regressions been

Bug#988184: unblock: gnome-desktop3/3.38.5-2

m + + * Team upload + + [ Gunnar Hjalmarsson ] + * d/p/xkbinfo-Update-iso639Ids-correctly-in-evdev.patch: +Don't list all keyboard layouts under "Other" in +gnome-control-center's list of input sources +(Closes: #987603, LP: #1925792) + + [ Simon McVittie ] + * Improve patch metada

Bug#987947: unblock (pre-approval): gtk+3.0/3.24.24-4

SMB server's list of shares + (e.g. smb://192.168.1.1/) in Nautilus + * d/p/updateiconcache-Sort-list-of-entries.patch: +Mark as applied upstream to GTK 3 as well as to GTK 4 + + -- Simon McVittie Sun, 02 May 2021 12:34:12 +0100 + gtk+3.0 (3.24.24-3) unstable; urgency=medium * d/pat

Bug#987000: ITP: gi-docgen -- source code documentation tool using GObject-Introspection

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Simon McVittie X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org * Package name: gi-docgen Version : 2021.2 or git snapshot Upstream Author : Emmanuele Bassi * URL : https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gi

Bug#986999: RFP: fonts-red-hat -- Red Hat type family

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-fo...@lists.debian.org, debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org * Package name: fonts-red-hat Version : 4.0.0 Upstream Author : Jeremy Mickel * URL : https://github.com/RedHatOfficial/RedHatFont * License : SIL

Bug#986114: unblock: gnome-session/3.38.0-4

logins due to an older session lingering and the +environment being reused. One consequence is that Electron applications +crash (LP: #1764355) + + [ Simon McVittie ] + * d/patches: Turn upstream bug reference into a URL + * d/patches: Actively remove undesired variables from activation +

Bug#985408: unblock: mutter/3.38.4-1

. +- Many other fixes that we already had via debian/patches + * Drop most patches, included in the new upstream release + + -- Simon McVittie Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:52:33 + + mutter (3.38.3-5) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series

Bug#985407: unblock: gnome-shell/3.38.4-1

+ * Drop all patches, applied upstream + + -- Simon McVittie Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:52:47 + + gnome-shell (3.38.3-4) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series deleted file mode 100644 index 8e6a9d6c1..0 --- a/debian/patches

Re: testing/bullseye: Still installing vino when we really should be installing gnome-remote-desktop

On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 at 11:49:00 +, Philip Wyett wrote: > I am no Pipewire expert like you Please don't mistake me for a Pipewire expert! I'm only doing drive-by uploads because we need it for GNOME. I do not have the bandwidth to be responsible for Pipewire and you'll notice I have

Re: testing/bullseye: Still installing vino when we really should be installing gnome-remote-desktop

On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 at 05:01:30 +, Philip Wyett wrote: > Installing Debian testing and now also using bullseye-DI-alpha3, the > default desktop install/gnome is still installing vino and not > installing gnome-remote-desktop by default. The version of meta-gnome3 in GNOME team git Suggests

Re: Bug#968204: Removal of packges which depend on GTK2

On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 at 09:11:23 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello GNOME team, Note that pkg-gnome-maintainers receives bugmail etc. for the entire GNOME suite, and most (all?) GNOME maintainers aren't subscribed to that particular fire hose (we get bug mail for packages of interest, or for all

Review/testing requested for gnome-team/glib!9: cleaning up old GLib from /lib/

Now that GNOME 3.38 is (mostly) in testing, I've finally implemented a fix for the GLib upgrade issues referred to the technical committee in #911225 "Advice on stale libraries in a higher-precedence path entry" (see #896019, #955331, #954960). Sorry for the very long delay in implementing this.

Re: Bug#969321: transition: GNOME 3.38, libmutter-7-0

On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 at 09:34:32 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Let's go ahead with the mutter/shell transition. This seems to be progressing OK, after a bit of a fight with mozjs78 to get it passing tests on mipsen. mutter transition is green:

Re: Bug#969321: transition: GNOME 3.38 (mutter, evolution-data-server, etc.)

/transitions/html/auto-evolution-data-server.html On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 12:00:05 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > GNOME 3.38 will be released on 2020-09-16, and beta versions of the > major packages (versioned 3.37.x) are already making their way into > experimental and Ubuntu. The ftp team have now

Re: RFS: gnome-maps/3.30.3.1-0+deb10u1 [NMU] -- map application for GNOME

On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 at 10:35:48 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 at 04:02:56 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > > Can we have this uploaded for the upcoming 10.6? Still seen no love and > > missed so many point releases now. Just need someone with permissions to > &g

Re: RFS: gnome-maps/3.30.3.1-0+deb10u1 [NMU] -- map application for GNOME

On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 at 21:39:49 +0800, xiao sheng wen 肖盛文 wrote: > The only question is lintian check has some info Some Lintian warnings are normal for a stable update, where the changes that would prevent those warnings would break the rule of including only minimal changes. smcv

Bug#970239: buster-pu: package gnome-shell/3.30.2-11~deb10u2

eam upload + + [ Mike Gabriel ] + * debian/patches: ++ Add loginDialog-*_CVE-2020-17498.patch. loginDialog: Reset auth prompt on + vt switch before fade in. (Closes: #968311. CVE-2020-17489). + + -- Simon McVittie Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:22:32 +0100 + gnome-shell (3.30.2-11~deb10u1) buster; urge

Re: RFS: gnome-maps/3.30.3.1-0+deb10u1 [NMU] -- map application for GNOME

On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 at 04:02:56 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > Can we have this uploaded for the upcoming 10.6? Still seen no love and > missed so many point releases now. Just need someone with permissions to > do it and a little time. Sorry, the GNOME team has the same problem as every other major

Re: epoch bump for babl and gegl libraries

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 12:29:13 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:21:37AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > The GNOME team intend to add an epoch to the babl and gegl libraries, > > Question: what about changing the package name instead, and doing a > t

epoch bump for babl and gegl libraries

The GNOME team intend to add an epoch to the babl and gegl libraries, so I'm checking for consensus (Debian Policy §5.6.12.1). As usual with epochs, this is a bad situation that I am trying to mitigate as much as possible, rather than anything elegant or exemplary. babl and gegl are 2D image

Bug#968341: mozjs68: new upstream branch mozjs78, required by gjs 1.65 / GNOME 3.37

Source: mozjs68 Version: 68.9.0-1 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org It's that time again. gjs 1.65 (part of the current GNOME development branch) needs a new version of mozjs, corresponding to an ESR branch of Firefox. As usual this involves SONAME breaks and the

Re: Who wants to take over gtk-vector-screenshot?

On Sat, 08 Aug 2020 at 12:11:05 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > The hack involved a gtk3 module, and the screenshot taking program > actually instructs the real program to generate the SVG, using > Gtk/Gdk’s uniform interface for drawing on the screen and in PDF files. > > The hack is a bit

Re: Bug#954422: transition: GNOME 3.36

On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 12:27:04 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Let's go ahead. gnome-desktop3 has migrated, but gnome-shell and mutter have not. We're now getting reports that GNOME Shell in testing is crashing because it indirectly loads more than one copy of gnome-desktop3. Would it be

Re: Bug#954422: transition: GNOME 3.36

On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 12:27:04 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Let's go ahead. The situation looks to be in a good state. Extensions have > always been treated this way, on a best effort basis during the transitions, > so > we'll keep as many as we can but if any of them aren't compatible

Re: Bug#954422: transition: GNOME 3.36

On 21/03/2020 13:17, Simon McVittie wrote: > > It would probably make most sense to treat gnome-desktop3 and mutter as > > a single transition, as we have often done in the past: upstream will > > not have tested arbitrary mixtures of 3.34 and 3.36. Progress on this: After c

Bug#956147: gnome-shell-xrdesktop: Please update for GNOME 3.36 transition

Source: gnome-shell-xrdesktop Severity: important Control: block 954422 by -1 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org GNOME Shell is tightly coupled to corresponding versions of mutter and gjs, so I don't think it's going to be realistic to support the versions of gnome-shell and

Bug#954774: mozjs68: FTBFS on armel: rust/cargo using armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabi, should be armv5te-unknown-linux-gnueabi

Source: mozjs68 Version: 68.5.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: will break gjs and gnome-shell which previously worked X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org Control: block 954422 by -1 mozjs68 FTBFS on armel: > checking for cargo... /usr/bin/cargo > checking rustc

Re: Bug#954553: nautilus: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: libpango1.0-dev (>= 1.44) but 1.42.4-8 is to be installed

On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 at 08:38:21 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: libpango1.0-dev (>= 1.44) but > > 1.42.4-8 is to be installed I see two possible routes forward: - upload Pango 1.44.x to unstable now

Bug#954422: transition: GNOME 3.36

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: moreinfo User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org You've probably seen that parts of GNOME 3.36 (libraries with stable API/ABI, and leaf applications) are starting to make

Re: the memory leak bug affecting gdm3 upstream GNOME bug seems to have been disappeared.

On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 at 15:17:44 +, shirish शिरीष wrote: > Few months back I came to know of #895990 specifically while trying to > install gdm3. The bug is still outstanding Sorry, "GNOME Shell memory use increases" is not really an actionable bug. It's a symptom that can appear for multiple

Re: Bug#931595: mutest package

On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 18:15:30 +0700, Arnaud Rebillout wrote: > remote: A default branch (e.g. master) does not yet exist for > gnome-team/mutest > remote: Ask a project Owner or Maintainer to create a default branch I pushed the branches from https://salsa.debian.org/arnaudr-guest/mutest, with

Re: Bug#931595: mutest package

On Fri, 02 Aug 2019 at 12:29:12 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Mon, 08 Jul 2019 at 11:48:17 +0700, Arnaud Rebillout wrote: > > - I asked for access to the gnome team on salsa, my user is `arnaudr-guest` > > Someone on the Owners list will have to do this; but if nobody gets r

Bug#944233: stretch-pu: package glib2.0/2.50.3-2+deb9u1

/GDBus-prefer-getsockopt-style-credentials-passing-APIs.patch: +Ensure libdbus clients can authenticate with a GDBusServer like the +one in ibus, backported from upstream 2.62.x branch (Closes: #941018) + * d/control.in: Update Vcs-Git, Vcs-Browser + + -- Simon McVittie Wed, 06 Nov 2019

Bug#944133: buster-pu: package glib2.0/2.58.3-2+deb10u2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu A recent security fix to ibus (CVE-2019-14822, #940267, DSA-4525-1) exposed an interoperability bug between GLib's implementation of D-Bus and the reference implementation libdbus

Re: Bug#935250, #935252: buster-pu: mutter, gnome-shell

On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 08:41:31 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > I uploaded some mutter fixes to unstable after the buster release which > I think would be worth considering for a buster update - perhaps for > 10.2 rather than 10.1 at this point. On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 08:44:47 +01

Re: Bug#888939: Nautilus 3.26 or 3.28 for Debian now?

On Sat, 07 Sep 2019 at 11:07:05 +0200, intrigeri wrote: > Jeremy Bicha: > > The only reason I'm hesitating is because we don't have a good > > solution in place for desktop icons yet. > > Since then, we've released Buster with: > > - Nautilus 3.30 > > - gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons >

Bug#939019: buster-pu: package epiphany-browser/3.32.1.2-3~deb10u1

+ epiphany-browser-3.32.1.2/debian/changelog 2019-08-30 22:39:13.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,24 @@ +epiphany-browser (3.32.1.2-3~deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium + + * Team upload + * Rebuild for Debian 10 +- d/gbp.conf: Set packaging branch to debian/buster + + -- Simon McVittie Fri, 30 Aug

Bug#935395: RFP: python3-anytree -- Tree data library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: python3-anytree Version : 2.6.0 Upstream Author : "c0fec0de" * URL : https://github.com/c0fec0de/anytree https://pypi.org/project/anytree/ * License : Apache 2.0 Programming Lang: Python

Bug#935265: buster-pu: package gnome-control-center/1:3.30.3-2~deb10u1

30.3/debian/changelog 2019-02-10 23:35:05.0 + +++ gnome-control-center-3.30.3/debian/changelog 2019-08-21 08:56:24.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,31 @@ +gnome-control-center (1:3.30.3-2~deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium + + * Team upload + * Rebuild for Debian 10 + * d/gbp.conf: Set pack

Bug#935252: buster-pu: package gnome-shell/3.30.2-11~deb10u1

-1,3 +1,32 @@ +gnome-shell (3.30.2-11~deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium + + * Team upload + * Recompile for Debian 10 + * d/gbp.conf: Change packaging branch to debian/buster + + -- Simon McVittie Sun, 18 Aug 2019 19:50:59 +0100 + +gnome-shell (3.30.2-11) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Team up

Request for testing: glib2.0/2.50.3-2+deb9u1

I've prepared a GLib update for stretch, which works OK in a GNOME virtual machine, but I no longer have any stretch desktops in real use. If you are still using Debian stretch with libglib2.0-0 on a production machine, please could you try this proposed update and check that it doesn't cause

Re: mutest package

On Mon, 08 Jul 2019 at 11:48:17 +0700, Arnaud Rebillout wrote: > I'd like to package mutest for Debian. Is the GNOME packaging team > interested in this package, can I maintain it with the team? graphene already uses a bundled copy of mutest, so it would seem appropriate to maintain the unbundled

  1   2   >