Re: Native vs. non-native packages

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 21.01.2009, 12:37 -0600 schrieb John Goerzen: I maintain a number of my own Haskell libraries as Debian native packages. I do that because of convenience and because that is how I maintain them: they are Debian native, because building them as Debian packages is my

Re: Native vs. non-native packages

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 21.01.2009, 14:44 -0600 schrieb John Goerzen: Joachim Breitner wrote: you could develop it all in one branch, but before running dpkg-buildpackage run a script that does (untested code) UPSTREAM_VERSION=$(cat debian/changelog|some_grep_magic) SOURCE_NAME=$(cat

Re: GHC 6.10.1 uploaded to experimental

Hi, Am Montag, den 02.02.2009, 10:57 +0200 schrieb Kari Pahula: I'll need to review the library versioning scheme a bit more. I think I should bring it to debian-devel before doing anything of the sort. would you mind CC’ing d-haskell as well on these mails? While I’m still subscribed to

HAppS and Happstack

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 19.02.2009, 21:00 +0200 schrieb Kari Pahula: I'm orphaning HAppS and haskell-hspread. Come and take them. I’m interesting in taking over HAppS (unless someone else is more interested), as I’ve been working with that a bit already. It seems that HAppS is obsoleted by

Problems with reinstall a package

Hi, our maintainer scripts are not perfect yet: I have libghc6-x11-dev installed (from testing it). Then I upload it, and apt-get wants to re-install it (for whatever reason, but that is not the point): [..] Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von libghc6-x11-dev 1.4.5-1 (durch

Re: [Fwd: ITP: libghc6-extensible-exceptions -- Extensible exceptions for the Glasgow Haskell Compiler]

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 26.02.2009, 11:20 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: Mensagem encaminhada De: Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva mar...@holoscopio.com Para: Debian Bug Tracking System sub...@bugs.debian.org Assunto: ITP: libghc6-extensible-exceptions -- Extensible

Re: [Fwd: ITP: libghc6-extensible-exceptions -- Extensible exceptions for the Glasgow Haskell Compiler]

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 26.02.2009, 13:32 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: Em Qui, 2009-02-26 às 16:15 +0100, Joachim Breitner escreveu: Am Donnerstag, den 26.02.2009, 11:20 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: Assunto: ITP: libghc6-extensible-exceptions -- Extensible

Re: ITP : Haskell Curl bindings

Hi, Am Samstag, den 07.03.2009, 11:37 +1100 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: I intend to package the Haskell libcurl bindings http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/curl I have already contacted the upstream author, Sigbjorn Finne who has blessed this endeavour. I have

Re: haskell-ghc-paths

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 05.03.2009, 14:47 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: I've packaged haskell-ghc-paths[0]. Joachim, can you upload it for me? done Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID:

Re: ITP : Haskell Curl bindings

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 15.03.2009, 13:53 +1100 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: Trent W. Buck wrote: If the code is licensed under the GPL (or similar) and doesn't have an openssl exception clause, I think you are supposed to build-depend specifically on the -gnutls flavour. I'm looking at

Re: Unstable : Version issues with libghc6-regex-base-dev

Hi, Am Montag, den 16.03.2009, 12:26 +1100 schrieb Trent W. Buck: Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org writes: libghc6-regex-base-dev: Depends: ghc6 ( 6.8.2+) but 6.10.1+dfsg1-13 is to be installed Depends: libghc6-mtl-dev ( 1.1.0.0+) but 1.1.0.2-6 is to be installed

Re: ITP : Haskell Curl bindings

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 15.03.2009, 15:27 +1100 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: I've uploaded a new version here: http://www.mega-nerd.com/tmp/Debian/ I've given it version 1.3.4-2 to distinguish it from the previous one, but I'll down grade it to -1 again when its time for the real ITP. $

Re: updated version of cabal-debian

Hi, Am Montag, den 23.03.2009, 21:16 -0500 schrieb Jeremy Shaw: - A patch that prevents the generation of less than dependencies so it still tries to build if the dependencies get newer haskell-devscripts does not generate build-dependencies. Do you refer to binary dependencies? I think

Re: updated version of cabal-debian

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 26.03.2009, 10:57 -0700 schrieb David Fox: On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote: Hi, Am Montag, den 23.03.2009, 21:16 -0500 schrieb Jeremy Shaw: - A patch that prevents the generation of less

Re: New version of haskell-devscripts

Hi Kaol, Am Montag, den 23.03.2009, 11:27 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: I've included mk-haskell-deps in haskell-devscripts, using name dh_haskell_shlibdeps. I've made the following patch to hlibrary to make it use this script. It provides better dependencies for haskell

Re: New version of haskell-devscripts

Hi, Am Montag, den 30.03.2009, 11:40 +0300 schrieb Kari Pahula: On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 08:30:21PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: Hi Kaol, I don't know why you're waiting for my opinion on this. I'm not the haskell-devscripts maintainer. Go ahead with it if you want to. Fix it if you

Re: New version of haskell-devscripts

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 31.03.2009, 13:30 +0300 schrieb Kari Pahula: C -dev libraries only depend on the corresponding C shared library and other C -dev libraries, not on other C shared libraries. The C shared libraries depend on the other shared libraries that it uses. But with haskell

Re: ANN: cabal-debian et el

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 01.04.2009, 17:58 -0500 schrieb Jeremy Shaw: 3. BONUS: apt-get-build-depends apt-get provides a command build-depends so that you can do, apt-get build-depends for a source package, to install all the required build dependencies. Unfortuantely, it does not look at the

register packages via triggers

Hi, I’d like to seize a suggestion from kaol and bring it up for discussion. He mentioned, on IRC I think, that it might be feasible to register haskell packages not by maintainer scripts, but by putting the package description in a well-known directory and let ghc6 build the package data base

Re: NMU of haskell-uulib

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2009, 08:52 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: I've made a package of haskell-uulib [0]. Arjan, is it ok for you if I NMU it? Joachim, if it's ok for Arjan, can you upload it to me? I’m under the impression that his NMU-ok was meant generally, so I

Re: New version of haskell-devscripts

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 07.04.2009, 10:50 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: Joachim, have you uploaded haskell-devscripts? If not, I've done a new version, without changing the number, since the other one was not uploaded AFAIK. Can you upload this one?

Quick idea: VCS for cabal-debian → official-debian modifications

Hi, an idea just crossed my mind. I hope it doesn’t sound too confused :-) Shouldn’t it be possible to use have a workflow like this: (replace branch by repository if you want to use darcs) * One a branch for upstream releases * Forking off this branch for each version, to store the result of

Re: Any standards in packaging haskell libraries?

Hi, Am Montag, den 20.04.2009, 19:26 +0200 schrieb Iustin Pop: I'm thinking of packaging the json library (http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/json) as it's not currently in Debian (and I need it for a project of mine and it gets tedious to install from source on every

Re: Using packages.conf.d for Haskell libraries

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 21.04.2009, 12:01 +0300 schrieb Kari Pahula: I'd say that using that is much simpler than either calling ghc-pkg in individual postinst/postrm or using triggers in the ghc6 package. packages.conf.d is already supported by both ghc and ghc-pkg. Great! Also, I'd like to

Re: Debian Haskell Platform status and bug reports

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 07.05.2009, 17:55 -0500 schrieb John Goerzen: Can anyone update me on the status of Debian support for the Haskell Platform? http://hackage.haskell.org/platform/ There has been talk on the mailing list about it. We'd probably make haskell-platform a

Re: New version of gtk2hs

Hi, Am Samstag, den 09.05.2009, 17:31 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: I've made a new version of gtk2hs. It's available at http://debian.holoscopio.com/gtk2hs . Joachim, can you upload it please? Nice, my last upload for a while: - Include DM-Upload-Allowed: yes.

Re: Bug#530238: libghc6-x11-doc: Uninstallable.

Hi Kurt, hi d-haskell, Am Sonntag, den 24.05.2009, 14:56 +0200 schrieb Kurt Roeckx: reopen 530238 notfixed 530238 1.4.5-3+b1 thanks On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 01:33:15PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: Am Samstag, den 23.05.2009, 11:09 +0200 schrieb Kurt Roeckx: Package: libghc6-x11-doc

Re: Bug#530238: libghc6-x11-doc: Uninstallable.

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 24.05.2009, 15:11 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: Am Sonntag, den 24.05.2009, 15:06 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: @d-haskell: This seems to affect most of our packages. So what do we do about this? Revert to sourceful uploads again? Manually upload 1.4.5-3 +b1

Re: Sourceful uploads of libraries required...

Hi, Am Montag, den 25.05.2009, 23:55 +0300 schrieb Kari Pahula: On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 09:13:37AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: * Do we need to depend on ghc-doc (now that documentation is installed via triggers) at all? I wouldn't use a Dependency for -doc packages at all, but rather

Re: NMUs?

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 27.05.2009, 00:06 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: On the haskell side of the fence, there are still numerous packages which are still 6.8.2 only, even though the 6.10.1 compiler hit unstable months ago and the new compiler 6.10.3 has been around for at least a week.

Re: Downgrading parsec to 2.x?

Hi, Am Freitag, den 29.05.2009, 15:51 +0300 schrieb Kari Pahula: I could just bump Parsec back to 2.1.0.1. But I decided to ask for a second opinion this time around. Anyone want to see 3.x also? Or only 3.x, after all? I happend to start a new project with parsec 3 (mostly by chance,

Re: (partial) ghc6 6.10.3 library transition

Hi again, this package was tried while a dependency was broken. The bug has been fixed and they can be re-tried: gb haskell-x11-xft-0.3-3+b1 . amd64 sparc Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID:

Re: Forcing a rebuild with ghc-6.10.3

Hi, Am Samstag, den 30.05.2009, 10:47 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: I'm a new maintainer and my first haskell package is haskell-curl version 1.3.5-1 which my sponsor uplaoded on May 18th, a day before Kari Pahula uploaded the new 6.10.3 compiler. Its my understanding that to kick off

Re: New version of *

Hi Marco, all three packages uploaded. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter

cabal-debian ITP?

Hi, I’m just wondering: Does anyone plan to upload a haskell-debian package to Debian? It would be convenient to play around with cabal-debian, and the debian library might also be interesting, e.g. to write a tool that outputs information about packages that need to be binNMUed or uploaded. It

Re: Tracking binNMU progress

Hi Trent, Am Montag, den 08.06.2009, 17:13 +1000 schrieb Trent W. Buck: Currently I'm looking at haskell-html and seeing it can't be installed with 6.10.3. If I've understood the posts on this list correctly, - such problems go away after a binNMU or an NMU; - someone is slowly working

Bug#532381: -doc dependencies on haddock

Package: haskell-devscripts Version: 0.6.15+nmu10 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, at the moment, if you put Depends: ${haskell:Depends} in debian/control for the -doc package stanza, dh_haskell_prep will add this line: Depends: haddock ( 2.4.2+), haddock (=

Re: (partial) ghc6 6.10.3 library transition

Hi jgoerzen, I wanted to add hdbc-odbc to the binNMU requests and started to look at your packages. I’m about to submit these binNMU requests to debian-release, to build the buildable packages and to make sure that once haskell-network is updated, the other packages are built immediatelly and in

Re: OCaml transition monitor

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 11.06.2009, 11:00 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: I've just come across [0] from a mail to an Ubuntu list. Now I'm not familiar with the way that OCaml transitions are carried out, but just from staring at the source for a minute it seems to be similar to the way that we

Re: Bug#532381: -doc dependencies on haddock

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 10.06.2009, 15:39 -0700 schrieb David Fox: On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva mar...@holoscopio.com wrote: what do you think is the appropriate output? I'd say there's no dependencies for documentation packages. I

Re: haskell-haskeline

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2009, 09:39 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: I've made a new version of haskell-haskeline[0]. Joachim, can you upload it please? Good morning. 0: http://debian.holoscopio.com/haskell-haskeline done. Your .orig.tar.gz was (again) not readable

Re: RFS: agda

Hi, Am Freitag, den 19.06.2009, 15:02 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: I'm not particularly fussed about how it enters to be honest, but my reasoning for putting it in the same source package is because the code is only three lines long* and I didn't want to go for the overhead of NEW review etc

Re: RFS: agda

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 21.06.2009, 01:26 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: On 19 Jun 2009, at 17:06, Joachim Breitner wrote: Do you mean 'should not be built by default'? If it is possible to ship both in the same hackage package and not install the executable by default yet be able to install

Re: Debian Haskell Policy and group procedures

Hi, Am Samstag, den 04.07.2009, 09:55 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: On 4 Jul 2009, at 08:46, Joachim Breitner wrote: Just to be sure: You would like to see even less people mentioned in Uploaders:, so people who do an upload, but don’t feel especially attached to the package would not add

Re: Git? (Was: Team maint update)

Hi Marco, Am Samstag, den 04.07.2009, 10:24 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: Em Sat, 04 Jul 2009 09:54:25 +0200 Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org escreveu: (...) I have a question WRT that layout. With SVN, it would be possible to check out the debian/ folder of one package

Re: Debian Haskell Policy and group procedures

Hi Ian, Am Samstag, den 04.07.2009, 12:15 +0100 schrieb Ian Lynagh: On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 12:11:57AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: http://urchin.earth.li/~ian/haskell-policy/haskell-policy.html/index.html Note that http://urchin.earth.li/~ian/haskell-policy/ is a darcs repo

GHC (Was: Git?)

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 05.07.2009, 13:33 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: For me, with a crappy Australian internet connection that is a huge win, especially if we eventually get GHC (which is big) into the same repo. just a quick side-note: I don’t think its desireable to have the ghc package

Darcs? Was: Git?

Hi, Am Samstag, den 04.07.2009, 22:31 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: May I propose a change to the darcs repository layout? I’d suggest we actually do have one darcs repository, containing the debian/ files, per package. The advantages are: * A tool very similar to build-pkg-haskell can

NMUing haskell-src-exts

Hi, I’m considering to NMU haskell-src-exts, as I’d like to see hlint in Debian. The other missing dependency, uniplate, is in NEW thx to Trent. Does anyone expect a version bump from 0.2.1~darcs20071212-2 to 1.0.1 cause problems (as parsec 2 to 3 did)? Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata

Re: I thnk we've alll been waiting for this one :-)

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 07.07.2009, 08:35 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: At last, haskell-parsec2 has made it from the Debian NEW queue to unstable. ah, great. I know who did that, and maybe I’ll ask him directly earlier next time we have such a big blocker. ;-) Greetings, Joachim --

Re: Debian Haskell Policy and group procedures

Hi, Am Samstag, den 04.07.2009, 01:48 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: The debatable details are: * Who sets the release to unstable, and when? * Who sets the git tag and when? With the proposed scheme, the release in the changelog indicates the desired state (package ought to be uploaded),

Yay! pet.cgi is running

Hi, after some sed -i s/svn/darcs pet.cgi (or something close :-)), we got a running instance of pet.cgi tracking our darcs repositories: http://pkg-haskell.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/pet.cgi It might well be that some links and features don’t work yet correctly, please tell me about it. Also

Re: Yay! pet.cgi is running

Hi, In case you are wondering why haskell-x11-xft is listed under „Work in progress“: That’s because it is not owned by the group. If the Maintainer were the group, then this would be listed under a last section „Unclassified“. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer

Re: binNMU request generation script

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 07.07.2009, 12:49 +1000 schrieb Trent W. Buck: Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org writes: [...] @debian-release: I have tried to merge equal lines for different arches. [...] # Architecture: i386 # Architecture: amd64 # Architecture: powerpc Do such rebuild

Re: Bug#535967: Inconsistent state after removal.

Hi Marco, Am Dienstag, den 07.07.2009, 09:08 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: Em Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:17:17 -0300 Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva mar...@riseup.net escreveu: (...) I'll try to reproduce it with --global in the prerm script. If it works, I'll prepare a

haskell-ghc-mtl

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 07.07.2009, 08:48 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: Hi Joachim. Em Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:56:54 +0200 Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org escreveu: (...) This time it seems that Marco has chosen to start haskell-hint_0.3.1.0-2 even though -1 was not uploaded

Re: Please, package Codec.Binary.Base64 library

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 07.07.2009, 16:45 +0400 schrieb Dmitry E. Oboukhov: On 14:26 Tue 07 Jul , Joachim Breitner wrote: JB Hi Dimitry, JB Am Dienstag, den 07.07.2009, 15:03 +0400 schrieb Dmitry E. Oboukhov: One of my packages (new upstream version of hedgewars) needs haskell module

Re: haskell-ghc-mtl

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 07.07.2009, 12:02 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: It’s available now, but it seems that ghc-mtl nees a newer monadcatchio: Configuring ghc-mtl-1.0.1.0... hlibrary.setup: At least the following dependencies are missing: MonadCatchIO-mtl =0.2.0.0 I

haskell-uulib build failure

Hi, haskell-uulib_0.9.10-0.1 (nmu by Marco) fails due to: Configuring uulib-0.9.10... hlibrary.setup: ffihugs is required but it could not be found. Marco, did you see that? Is there anyone in the DHG that feels especially attached (and thus responsible :-)) for hugs? Thanks, Joachim --

hs-plugins taken over

Version: 1.4.1-1 Hi, I’ve taken over Florian’s other haskell package, hs-plugins. It took quite long, due to the non-standard hs-plugins-doc package name and the included TeX-Documentation. I hope I got it right. I’ve added a -prof package, so I it will go through NEW. Greetings, Joachim --

Re: hs-plugins taken over

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 08.07.2009, 14:40 -0700 schrieb Don Stewart: Are there any Debian packages that use hs-plugins? Note: it is in bare maintainance mode upstream... One: haskelldb-dynamic. I guess this is in bare maintenance mode as well... Do you think we should rather remove hs-plugins

Re: [Pkg-haskell-commits] darcs: haskell-hint: Mark package as unreleased

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 09.07.2009, 08:27 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: Em Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:43:02 + Joachim Breitnerm...@joachim-breitner.de escreveu: (...) * Mark package as unreleased (...) I also removed the tag from the repository, as it was tagging an

ghc6 migration aid

Hi release team, I’d like to start having an eye on the next ghc6 migration. The package has now built on all arches but ia64. Besides that, by looking at http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ghc6, it’s mostly library that have either * not been updated to the newer ghc (such

hscolour

Hi Team, I noticed that hscolour is very old and does not ship libghc6-hscolour-dev, which will be useful for hlint and maybe some of the editors. It’s maintained by Ian and thus up for adoption. If someone wants to give it a shot it would be nice. Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner

Re: Migration from unstable to testing

Hi, Am Samstag, den 11.07.2009, 10:52 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: My first haskell package is blocked from transitioning from unstable to testing: http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=haskell-curl Is there anything I should do about this or should I just wait

Re: hscolour

Hi Erik, Am Samstag, den 11.07.2009, 16:50 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: I noticed that hscolour is very old and does not ship libghc6-hscolour-dev, which will be useful for hlint and maybe some of the editors. It’s maintained by Ian and thus up for adoption. If someone wants to

Please retry haskell-vty on mipsel

Hi, something went wrong when installing the build-dependencies of haskell-vty on your buildd: Setting up man-db (2.5.5-2) ... dpkg: error processing man-db (--configure): subprocess post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault) I assume this is not acutally related to

Please retry haskell-curl on powerpc

Hi, haskell-curl was tried on powerpc, which failed due to an uninstallable dependency libghc6-network-dev. This dependency is installed now, so please retry haskell-curl_1.3.5-2. Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid:

Re: hscolour

Hi, Am Samstag, den 11.07.2009, 22:18 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: I’m wondering why you didn’t add the Debian Haskell Group as the maintainer? Whats the format for doing this? Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group pkg-haskell-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org and add yourself to

Re: hscolour

Hi, Am Samstag, den 11.07.2009, 14:51 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: Great. Until John has added you I saw from planet that John has just had a baby (congratulations!) so I wouldn't expect him to be around too much for a while. If you wouldn't mind, perhaps you can ask Arjan or Florian to make

Re: RFS: agda

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 12.07.2009, 01:45 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: Could you upload? Thanks for sorting out the rebuilds by the way. Done and tagged. Please make sure you are subscribed to pkg-haskell-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org, to receive the bugreports etc. :-) Greetings, Joachim --

Re: Bug#536589: support for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=n broken

Hi, Am Montag, den 13.07.2009, 07:58 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: Em Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:39:40 +0200 Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org escreveu: (...) haskell-devscripts has support for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=n, but it’s broken: (...) At least for packages

Re: libghc6-x11-xft-prof suggests libghc6-x11-doc

Hi, Am Montag, den 13.07.2009, 08:31 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: I was changing the packages to use haskell:Recommends and Suggests, and I saw that libghc6-x11-xft-prof suggests libghc6-x11-doc. Should I leave this? no, probably a copy’n’paste error. Thanks, Joachim --

Re: fgl status?

Hi Ravi, Am Montag, den 13.07.2009, 14:47 -0400 schrieb Ravi Nanavati: For Bluespec-related reasons, I'd like to see a version of fgl (ideally the most recent, but any version would be a step forward) that's built against ghc 6.10.3 in unstable. Is that waiting on anything other than the NMU

Re: More haskell give-backs

Hi, Am Montag, den 13.07.2009, 23:45 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes: This shoudl fix all problems with haskell packages listed on the above page that can be solved without sourceful uploads. We are slowly getting into shape :-) BTW, should I ask for gb/nmus for kfreebsd-* as well? in the

Re: Your haskell packages in the Debian Haskell Group?

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 14.07.2009, 17:54 +0200 schrieb Arjan Oosting: Op zaterdag 11-07-2009 om 13:51 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Joachim Breitner: A while ago you said that you had, for the time being, little time to maintain your Haskell packages. Some of your package have been NMUed

Re: Yay! pet.cgi is running

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 15.07.2009, 16:14 +0200 schrieb Martín Ferrari: On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 15:59, Martín Ferrarimartin.ferr...@gmail.com wrote: I don't remember if I ever finished that work (and alioth is down ATM), but I think it was near completed. It would be great if we could

Bug#537342: RM: haskell-edison -- ROM; Source package split by upstream

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ftp-masters, the haskell-edison package has been split by upstream in two source packages, haskell-edison-api and haskell-edison-core. I have uploaded these just now (sitting in NEW by the time you read

Re: Your haskell packages in the Debian Haskell Group?

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 19.07.2009, 15:14 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: Joachim Breitner wrote: c2hs I'm looking at this now, and I'm wondering, what is the proper way of moving something from svn.debian.org to darcs.debian.org. From looking at what

Re: Platform status

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 19.07.2009, 00:26 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: I created a wiki page[0] to track our effort towards Haskell platform compliance. This is only a first pass, and does not include issues such as GHC porting, install/buildability and parsec related problems. If anyone has such

Fixed by newer haskell-devscripts

Hi Lucas, judging from the build logs, these bug were caused by parallel build flags. These were causing problems, but this was fixed in haskell-devscripts_0.6.15+nmu12. Closing these bugs. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 |

Should haskell-devscripts depend on hscolour?

Hi, haskell-devscripts, by default, build docs with hscolour. At the moment, every package needs a Build-Dependency on hscolour, despite actually mentioning it anywhere. Woudn’t it make more sense to have haskell-devscripts depend on hscolour? Would it hurt somehow? Also, at least when the next

Re: Moving libraries' .haddock files to -dev packages

Hi, Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 23:30 +0300 schrieb Kari Pahula: Fortunately, all that's needed for this is a small change in haskell-devscripts. I can NMU it (again) soon, along with uploading ghc6, unless someone wants to say something about this. I should add that for all packages that

Re: Should haskell-devscripts depend on hscolour?

Hi, Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 19:03 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: This is actually a neat idea to avoid the sourceful uploads that I mentioned in my last mail: If the upcoming haskell-devscripts that will move haddock files to -dev would depend on these five packages, it is no

Re: Three new libs for DHG in Darcs

Hi Erik, until darcs on alioth is upgraded, please run killall -KILL darcs on alioth if darcs pushes fail: $ ps u -A|grep darcs 3994816427 72.7 0.0 99700 7940 ?Rsl 09:41 158:14 darcs apply --all --repodir /darcs/pkg-haskell/haskell-curl 39948 4387 66.9 0.0 99700 8252 ?

Re: Packages whose prof package don't yet depend on their dev package

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 21.07.2009, 13:50 -0700 schrieb David Fox: The versions of haskell-network and haskell-hunit currently in sid need to be rebuilt - they don't have the prof - dev dependencies that the lastest haskell-devscripts would give them. I’d say this is non-critical and can be

Re: haskell-regex-compat needs a build dependency on hscolour

Hi, I already noticed, pending with the next upload: http://darcs.debian.org/pkg-haskell/haskell-regex-compat/changelog Thanks anyways, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de |

Re: Ocaml do hash-based dependency

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 22.07.2009, 10:37 -0700 schrieb Don Stewart: nomeata: Hi, Just FYI: Today at lunch I listened to some Ocaml maintainer dicussions. They are going to implement a hash-based dependency system: Library packages calculate a (short, 5-letter) hash over their interface.

binNMUs for ghc6-6.10.4

Hi, a new version of ghc6 has been uploaded, and all library will have to be rebuild. This is the (hopefully) complete set of binNMUs for it, together with appropriate Deb-Waits to queue them: nmu haskell-alut_2.1.0.2-1 . alpha amd64 armel hppa i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc . -m'Rebuild

Re: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#538098: Please upgrade to ≥0.5.1.0.

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 11:07 +1000 schrieb Trent W. Buck: Package: libghc6-zlib-dev Version: 0.5.0.0-2+b1 Severity: wishlist Please upgrade haskell-zlib in Debian. The upcoming release of Darcs 2.3 requires haskell-zlib 0.5.1.0. Without it, Darcs will use its deprecated

More packages not getting proper DepWaits

Hi, it seems that even more buildds have built too early :-( nmu haskell-parsec2 . alpha armel hppa s390 sparc . -m Rebuild properly against ghc6 (= 6.10.4) dw haskell-parsec2 . ALL -ia64 . -m ghc6 (= 6.10.4), libghc6-mtl-dev (= 1.1.0.2-7+b1) dw haskell-parsec2 . ia64 . -m ghc6 (= 6.10.4),

Re: Bug#537705: ITP: agda-executable -- Commandline interface to Agda -- a dependently typed functional programming language and proof assistant

Hi, Am Freitag, den 24.07.2009, 14:30 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: On 24 Jul 2009, at 14:10, Joachim Breitner wrote: there is also the relatively common variant agda-bin. How is this any better than -executable though? Seems to me like the same issues apply to both. it is more common

Re: haskell-http

Hi, Am Freitag, den 24.07.2009, 16:49 -0700 schrieb David Fox: This new version of cdbs fails its unit tests when built on older distributions - is there a safe way to build haskell-http without it? Or maybe only a small patch to the current cdbs is required? you can build with an old cdbs if

Merged and updated haskell wb requests

Hi, I went through my unhandled mails from yesterday and put the requests, after updating them, into one file. Please apply these wb-commands and, ignore any previous mail. Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C

haskell-devscripts also in pet

Hi, despite haskell-devscripts having a different repository layout, I made it appear on http://pkg-haskell.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/pet.cgi (although it is quite a hack, and the link to the changelog does not work) Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer

Remove circular Dep-Wait

Hi, the emergency fix to make all packages that dep-wait on ghc6, also dep-wait on haddock helped to avoid FTBFS, but also introduced a nice circular dependency for haddock itself :-). Please do gb haddock . armel ia64 mips mipsel sparc . -o dw haddock . ia64 mips . -m 'ghc6 (= 6.10.4-1)'

Re: hsql-odbc and hsql-sqlite3

Hi Frederik, On 7/25/09, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote: Hi, I have put haskell-hsql-{,-mysql,-postgresql} back into shape. They had new upstream versions that made them compile with ghc-6.10.4. But hsql-odbc and hsql-sqlite3 do not, and also don’t build on hackage. Does

Re: [Pkg-haskell-commits] [SCM] Packaging for Agda branch, master, updated. debian/2.2.4+dfsg-1-1-ge69c7e6

Hi Iain, Am Montag, den 27.07.2009, 20:18 + schrieb Iain Lane: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit e69c7e6cbb69463bb08418918fcfdd4d5dc210de Author: Iain Lane la...@ubuntu.com Date: Mon Jul 27 21:18:41 2009 +0100 debian/control: Fix standards-version

Dependency graph

Hi, I tried to create a graph of the Debian Haskell packages and their dependencies: http://pkg-haskell.alioth.debian.org/dependency-graph.pdf The graph is generated by: ./getdata.sh ./haskell-pkg-graph.py | tred | unflatten | dot -Tpdf -o graph.pdf with the tools from the tools darcs

Re: pandoc depwaits

[Moving this back on the list] Hi, Am Dienstag, den 28.07.2009, 16:50 -0700 schrieb John MacFarlane: +++ Jonas Smedegaard [Jul 28 09 11:35 ]: On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:21:19AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: It’s always a bit tricky to take over a packer properly. But if he does

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >