Init Script for IPv6 6rd

2010-12-08 Thread Guillaume Leclanche
Hello, I have written some code to put together a nice init script for 6rd. The script is supposed to be used by customers of ISPs that deploy 6rd as an IPv6 access technology. The debian-based system running it is supposed to be the IPv6 gateway, but it doesn't have to be the IPv4 one as well,

Re: Thoughts about RA en DHCPv6 in /etc/network/interfaces

2010-12-08 Thread Kenyon Ralph
On 2010-12-08T20:31:24+0100, chiel ch...@gmx.net wrote: I configured a static IPv6 address in /etc/network/interfaces with the line iface eth0 inet6 static, all works good. However, because RA are being send I also have a SLAAC address, resulting in two IPv6 addresses. I know that I can

Re: Thoughts about RA en DHCPv6 in /etc/network/interfaces

2010-12-08 Thread Jay Ford
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, chiel wrote: On a test network I just installed a Debian server. On this network RA are being sent for SLAAC, just for testing. I configured a static IPv6 address in /etc/network/interfaces with the line iface eth0 inet6 static, all works good. However, because RA are being

Re: Thoughts about RA en DHCPv6 in /etc/network/interfaces

2010-12-08 Thread chiel
On 12/08/2010 08:51 PM, Jay Ford wrote: I agree that most things with a static IPv6 address probably don't also want a SLAAC address, but if you generalize this very much you'll cause trouble for some use scenarios. Basically, don't assume that static implies no SLAAC. RAs have information

Re: Thoughts about RA en DHCPv6 in /etc/network/interfaces

2010-12-08 Thread Jay Ford
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, chiel wrote: On 12/08/2010 08:51 PM, Jay Ford wrote: I agree that most things with a static IPv6 address probably don't also want a SLAAC address, but if you generalize this very much you'll cause trouble for some use scenarios. Basically, don't assume that static implies no

Re: Thoughts about RA en DHCPv6 in /etc/network/interfaces

2010-12-08 Thread chiel
On 12/08/2010 09:44 PM, Jay Ford wrote: Sure, just like rogue DHCP for IPv4 does. True, However if I remove the line iface eth0 inet dhcp I know for sure that I don't receive anything from a DHCP server. There is no equivalent for IPv6 in that file. That could work, though I suggest iface eth0

Re: Thoughts about RA en DHCPv6 in /etc/network/interfaces

2010-12-08 Thread Michael Richardson
chiel == chiel ch...@gmx.net writes: chiel On 12/08/2010 08:51 PM, Jay Ford wrote: I agree that most things with a static IPv6 address probably don't also want a SLAAC address, but if you generalize this very much you'll cause trouble for some use scenarios. Basically,