Re: IPv6 over ppp autoconfiguration not working in squeeze

2011-05-17 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Hello, Craig Small a écrit : On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:32:46PM +0100, Adam Spragg wrote: ISP has assigned me IPv6 block 2001:4d48:ad51:300::/56 and assured me it should just work. [...] I am getting an IPv6 address on ppp0 since adding the ppp options, but it's the local fe80::/10

Re: problem configuring squeeze

2011-05-17 Thread Tim Weippert
Hi, On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 06:55:00PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Mon, 16 May 2011, Bjørn Mork wrote: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org writes: On Mon, 16 May 2011, Bjørn Mork wrote: I don't think that will be much of a problem, given that you probably

Re: IPv6 over ppp autoconfiguration not working in squeeze

2011-05-17 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Adam Spragg a...@spra.gg wrote: Hi, net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra=2 While this supposedly accepts RA and does autoconfiguration even when forwarding is enabled, I don't think it is in Squeeze 2.6.32 yet. The patch was on LKML somewhere end of 2010. So, as the others have pointed out, you

Re: IPv6 over ppp autoconfiguration not working in squeeze

2011-05-17 Thread Marcus C. Gottwald
Good morning! Adam Spragg wrote (Mon 2011-May-16 23:32:46 +0100): I've thought about configuring the address statically, but can't figure out how to do it. address does not appear to be an option for ppp stanzas. I've tried setting it in the /etc/ppp/peers/myisp file with ipv6

Re: IPv6 over ppp autoconfiguration not working in squeeze

2011-05-17 Thread Sander
Adam Spragg wrote (ao): I've been trying to get IPv6 working on and off for a while now, and I just can't get it working. I've added the following lines to my /etc/ppp/options: +ipv6 Should that not be ipv6 , (including the comma) as per http://linux.die.net/man/8/pppd ?

IPv6 across suspend / resume -- who is responsible for flushing?

2011-05-17 Thread Michael Richardson
I suspended my laptop from my home (wifi) network which has native IPv6. I resume it on the VIA train which does not have any IPv6. I still have the prefix from home, so my laptop thinks it should still use it. I could turn the lifetime in the RA down a bunch, but that seems wrong.

Re: IPv6 across suspend / resume -- who is responsible for flushing?

2011-05-17 Thread Andrew O. Shadoura
Hello, On Tue, 17 May 2011 07:11:00 -0400 Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.ca wrote: I suspended my laptop from my home (wifi) network which has native IPv6. I resume it on the VIA train which does not have any IPv6. I still have the prefix from home, so my laptop thinks it should still

Re: [vserver] assigning less than /64 to individual guests

2011-05-17 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Hello, Eugen Leitl a écrit : So am I in the clear to parcel out a /64 in /80s, as long as all the /80 are all on the same LAN or VLAN? No autoconfig breakage ensues? Is 48 bits really enough for anybody? I don't know what you mean exactly, but stateless autoconfiguration won't work with a

Re: IPv6 across suspend / resume -- who is responsible for flushing?

2011-05-17 Thread Michael Richardson
Andrew == Andrew O Shadoura bugzi...@tut.by writes: I suspended my laptop from my home (wifi) network which has native IPv6. I resume it on the VIA train which does not have any IPv6. I still have the prefix from home, so my laptop thinks it should still use it. I

Re: IPv6 across suspend / resume -- who is responsible for flushing?

2011-05-17 Thread Andrew O. Shadoura
Hello, On Tue, 17 May 2011 13:05:30 -0400 Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.ca wrote: I used to use ifplugd, but NetworkManager is supposed to do more, particularily as it relates to WPA and crap like that. Well, that's the point, it is /supposed/, not it /does/. But, I think you are

Re: IPv6 over ppp autoconfiguration not working in squeeze

2011-05-17 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Bernhard Schmidt a écrit : Adam Spragg a...@spra.gg wrote: net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra=2 While this supposedly accepts RA and does autoconfiguration even when forwarding is enabled, I don't think it is in Squeeze 2.6.32 yet. The patch was on LKML somewhere end of 2010. That was added

Re: [vserver] assigning less than /64 to individual guests

2011-05-17 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 07:19:00PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote: Hello, Eugen Leitl a écrit : So am I in the clear to parcel out a /64 in /80s, as long as all the /80 are all on the same LAN or VLAN? No autoconfig breakage ensues? Is 48 bits really enough for anybody? I don't know

Re: [vserver] assigning less than /64 to individual guests

2011-05-17 Thread Michael Richardson
Eugen == Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org writes: Eugen Just sent that to the vserver list, but figured this is at Eugen least as relevant. Eugen So am I in the clear to parcel out a /64 in /80s, as long as Eugen all the /80 are all on the same LAN or VLAN? No autoconfig Eugen

Re: [vserver] assigning less than /64 to individual guests

2011-05-17 Thread Gerdriaan Mulder
As long as you give something like 2001:1234:5678::::/80 with static ip's, your only job is to do the routing (if necessary with proxy_ndp, if you're not running network on a bridge). It depends a bit on the networking stack you use. I use a routed setup, and I need to add every IPv6

Re: [vserver] assigning less than /64 to individual guests

2011-05-17 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 01:10:40PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: Eugen == Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org writes: Eugen Just sent that to the vserver list, but figured this is at Eugen least as relevant. Eugen So am I in the clear to parcel out a /64 in /80s, as long as

Re: [vserver] assigning less than /64 to individual guests

2011-05-17 Thread Andrew Ruthven
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 13:10 -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: Permitting autoconfig to work seems like a nice thing to retain. But not really necessary. For my vservers I allocate a /112 to them, on dummy0 and route a /64 from eth0 to dummy0. On some other vserver hosts where I can't setup

Re: [vserver] assigning less than /64 to individual guests

2011-05-17 Thread Michael Richardson
Eugen == Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org writes: If you are saying that you will allocate /80s to each vserver, but actually they will not be layer-2 isolated from each other, this is just an administrative partition, then I think it's a good idea. Eugen The Linux vserver

Re: IPv6 over ppp autoconfiguration not working in squeeze

2011-05-17 Thread Adam Spragg
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 11:01:11 Sander wrote: Adam Spragg wrote (ao): I've been trying to get IPv6 working on and off for a while now, and I just can't get it working. I've added the following lines to my /etc/ppp/options: +ipv6 Should that not be ipv6 , (including the comma) as

Re: Re: IPv6 over ppp autoconfiguration not working in squeeze

2011-05-17 Thread Adam Spragg
I am getting an IPv6 address on ppp0 since adding the ppp options, but it's the local fe80::/10 address, not the one assigned by my ISP. I've used tcpdump/wireshark to confirm I am receiving ICMPv6 neighbour advertisements and router advertisements. (Although the prefix information they

Re: Re: IPv6 over ppp autoconfiguration not working in squeeze

2011-05-17 Thread Adam Spragg
Correction : the scripts configures the PPP global address and the default route. The LAN address and prefix is configured in /etc/network/interfaces and /etc/radvd.conf. I've not looked into getting ipv6 working on my LAN yet. I figure it's more important to get it working from the server

Re: Re: IPv6 over ppp autoconfiguration not working in squeeze

2011-05-17 Thread Adam Spragg
For my IPv6-only PPPoE uplink, I've been using the following lines in a file in /etc/ppp/peers/ successfully for several years now: noip +ipv6 ipv6 ::abcd:1 If I use the option ipv6 ::1 then I just get the ipv6 address fe80::1/10 instead of fe80::4576:73e7:b3f5:eda6/10 on the