On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Onkar Shinde onkarshi...@gmail.com wrote:
Any advice on how to build this package in pbuilder and/or buildd?
Just add
deb http://people.debian.org/~twerner/ ./
to your sources.list.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Torsten Werner
mail.twer...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Onkar Shinde onkarshi...@gmail.com wrote:
Any advice on how to build this package in pbuilder and/or buildd?
Just add
deb http://people.debian.org/~twerner/ ./
to
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Vincent Fourmond fourm...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I'm interfering here, but I'm pretty sure that such a dirty
hack is a no-go for the security team.
that hack in not needed in Debian because the package is in unstable.
Can you explain what is the problem for
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Torsten Werner
mail.twer...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Vincent Fourmond fourm...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I'm interfering here, but I'm pretty sure that such a dirty
hack is a no-go for the security team.
that hack in not
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Vincent Fourmond fourm...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem here is that you don't have a complex package: one
binary, which build-depends on itself. Surely, you can work around
that, can't you ?
How? Just send me a patch and I'll apply it if it works.
Cheers,
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Vincent Fourmond fourm...@gmail.com wrote:
gcc is a nightmare - it is one of the very few things where you
can't work around the bootstrapping problem.
Just as a side note, gcc does not directly depend on itself. Or,
rather, gcc-4.3 depends on packages which
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Vincent Fourmond fourm...@gmail.com wrote:
You managed to build it at some point. You didn't have it before and
you had it after. So you did manage one to work around that. So you
should be able to build it without build-depending on itself, no ?
I had simply
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Torsten Werner
mail.twer...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Vincent Fourmond fourm...@gmail.com wrote:
You managed to build it at some point. You didn't have it before and
you had it after. So you did manage one to work around that. So you
* Vincent Fourmond:
Imagine there is a huge security hole in this package. Do you really
think the security team will want to use the *problematic* package to
build a *clean* one ?
The machines we use for building have no untrusted local users, and
only restricted networking.
Of course, we
Hi,
Can you please sponsor package electric version 8.08-1? The updated
packaging is available in pkg-java svn.
The changes done to the packaging are:
1. New changelog entry
2. Addition of ${misc:Depends} as runtime dependency to fix lintian warning.
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Vincent Fourmond fourm...@debian.org wrote:
Onkar Shinde wrote:
As I was the one who updated batik in Ubuntu I want to ask few
comments about the differences between Ubuntu packaging and Debian
packaging. I haven't yet tried to build the package.
1. Are you
11 matches
Mail list logo
