Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Markus and James, the Java team is certainly in need of more manpower so any help is appreciated. There are a lot of tasks, just check the BTS [1] and pick one :) However regarding Eclipse packaging, I don't think there are any small tasks that

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Le 15-juin-09 à 18:38, Matthew Johnson a écrit : Hi all, Hi Matthew, Relating to both the Eclipse stuff and the fact that I'd like to try and improve the Java packaging policy in Debian and have booked a debconf session to discuss it, who is still active here and interested in the Java

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le lundi 15 juin 2009 à 17:38 +0100, Matthew Johnson a écrit : Hi all, Relating to both the Eclipse stuff and the fact that I'd like to try and improve the Java packaging policy in Debian and have booked a debconf session to discuss it, who is still active here and interested in the Java

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello ! On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Matthew Johnsonmj...@debian.org wrote: Relating to both the Eclipse stuff and the fact that I'd like to try and improve the Java packaging policy in Debian and have booked a debconf session to discuss it, who is still active here and interested in the

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Pantelis Koukousoulas
About Eclipse, someone (a DD probably) should become the leader and dispatch the tasks... Leader or no leader, the best thing to do right now is to help packaging the dependencies of Eclipse. Unlike eclipse itself, its dependencies are typically not complexity monsters or anything and it would

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Tue Jun 16 14:04, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote: If some debianers help by dealing with dependencies, the job becomes much easier. Can someone post a list of needed deps and URLs to tarballs? I'll see what I can do -- Matthew Johnson signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Johnson wrote: On Tue Jun 16 14:04, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote: If some debianers help by dealing with dependencies, the job becomes much easier. Can someone post a list of needed deps and URLs to tarballs? And then maybe someone

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Pantelis Koukousoulas
Can someone post a list of needed deps and URLs to tarballs? And then maybe someone can find/file RFPs for those, and add them as blocking bugs of #432350. (Here is a nice short task for casual contributors BTW.) Fedora has a nice list of eclipse dependencies. There are also bugs in

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le mardi 16 juin 2009 à 12:07 +0100, Matthew Johnson a écrit : On Tue Jun 16 14:04, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote: If some debianers help by dealing with dependencies, the job becomes much easier. Can someone post a list of needed deps and URLs to tarballs? I'll see what I can do I can

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Jens Kapitza
I can help to package some of the deps if needed. I can offer my time if some can tell me how i can help. Which bugs should be fixed first? Is there some kind of roadmap? Jens Kapitza -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Pantelis Koukousoulas
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Jens Kapitzawebmas...@schwarze-allianz.de wrote: I can help to package some of the deps if needed. I can offer my time if some can tell me how i can help. Which bugs should be fixed first? Is there some kind of roadmap? Well a rough roadmap would go like

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Andrew Overholt
Hi, * Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt...@gmail.com [2009-06-16 07:04]: The Eclipse Linux Tools project (lead by the RedHat/Fedora people) is focusing on the build system problem. There is at least one ubuntu guy focusing on the build problem too, with a slightly different approach. I'd love to know

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Pantelis Koukousoulas
I'd love to know who this ubuntu guy is so we can coordinate efforts :) I have already told you (and to Alexander Kurtakov) :) He is Nathan Summers (aka rockwalrus). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Andrew Overholt
Hi, * Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt...@gmail.com [2009-06-16 08:32]: 2) Integrate the eclipse-build system from upstream Eclipse Linux Tools Project once it is released. Perhaps help so that it can be released sooner. Yes, we would love some help :) . 3) Figure out a filesystem layout for

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Pantelis Koukousoulas
3) Figure out a filesystem layout for plug-ins. An idea could be to do as Fedora does and use e.g., /usr/share/eclipse/plugin_name (thus staying out of P2's way) or figure out how to integrate apt with P2 (this will need development of a debian/apt specific touchpoint in P2-speak, at least as

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Andrew Overholt
* Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt...@gmail.com [2009-06-16 08:54]: 3) Figure out a filesystem layout for plug-ins. An idea could be to do as Fedora does and use e.g., /usr/share/eclipse/plugin_name (thus staying out of P2's way) or figure out how to integrate apt with P2 (this will need

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Pantelis Koukousoulas
We've kicked around the idea of p2 talking to PackageKit via D-Bus. This would be less intrusive than re-working how profile synchronization works and wouldn't be that hard.  I think Alex may have a working prototype. That would work too :) The ability for eclipse to talk d-bus would be very

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Andrew Overholt
* Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt...@gmail.com [2009-06-16 09:18]: Are the d-bus java bindings packaged / licensed in an eclipse-friendly way these days? I've been meaning to investigate this but it keeps falling off the top of my to-do list. It would be great if someone with the time could do this

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Tue Jun 16 09:29, Andrew Overholt wrote: * Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt...@gmail.com [2009-06-16 09:18]: Are the d-bus java bindings packaged / licensed in an eclipse-friendly way these days? I've been meaning to investigate this but it keeps falling off the top of my to-do list. It

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Andrew Overholt
* Matthew Johnson mj...@debian.org [2009-06-16 09:53]: I've also been contacted by someone from Eclipse, to whom I offered any help they needed in getting it to work, but I've not heard anything back. That was me and I've just been too busy to get back to you. Sorry. Andrew -- To

Re: Active Java packagers

2009-06-16 Thread Ludovic Claude
Matthew Johnson wrote: who is still active here and interested in the Java packaging policy? I am, currently working on jetty 6, maven 2.1.0 and adding Maven metadata to lots of existing packages + other cleanup (lintian...) Ludovic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: RFS: libslf4j-java (updated package)

2009-06-16 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi, On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Damien Raude-Morvandraz...@drazzib.com wrote: You should check my package in chroot now ;) I have uploaded it now. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: RFS: libspring-2.5-java

2009-06-16 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi Damien, On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Damien Raude-Morvandraz...@drazzib.com wrote: Torsten, as you already checked previous version of this package could you please ahve a look ? uploaded. Thanks for the package. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to