Re: Any plan to update java3d

2009-08-11 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Jonny Lambjo...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 07, 17:01:21 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: Is there anything else that needs to be done before this package can be pushed to Debian? The reason I am pushing is that I want to get this package synced from Debian to

Re: RFS: remotetea - Sun ONC/RPC support for Java

2009-08-11 Thread Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel
Le Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:22:02 +0100, Matthew Johnson mj...@debian.org a écrit : Do you need all three for the library? If so, there's nothing you can do and leave it like it is. I kept it like this :) tell me if you want it LGPL2+ or GPL2+ :) oops! yes, I meant the same as the upstream

Re: Any plan to update java3d

2009-08-11 Thread Jonny Lamb
On Tue, Aug 11, 13:52:08 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: After reading some old mails from 'Barak A. Pearlmutter' when he sponsored my first package and the manpage of svn-buildpackage I figured out what the problem is. I set two properties, svn-bp:origDir and mergeWithUpstream, on debian folder

Re: pkg-java team, subversion, git

2009-08-11 Thread Jan-Pascal van Best
Hi all, I've bitten the bullet and converted the solr work in the pkg-java svn to a new git (central) repository. There was already a directory /git/pkg-java on Alioth; I've created a solr.git repository beneath it. The process following

Re: pkg-java team, subversion, git

2009-08-11 Thread Vincent Fourmond
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Jan-Pascal van Bestjanpas...@vanbest.org wrote: Now for the next step: should I remove all files from SVN in pkg-java/trunk/solr with a commit message that says where the repository has been moved? Absolutely. We don't want two different repositories for one

Re: pkg-java team, subversion, git

2009-08-11 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi, On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Vincent Fourmondfourm...@debian.org wrote:  I'm wondering: would it be a good idea to remove everything but to leave a dummy file in pkg-java/trunk/solr stating that the packaging has been moved to a git repository ? I recommend moving such packages from

Re: pkg-java team, subversion, git

2009-08-11 Thread Jan-Pascal van Best
Vincent Fourmond wrote: Absolutely. We don't want two different repositories for one package. Make sure to update the Vcs-* fields. I'm wondering: would it be a good idea to remove everything but to leave a dummy file in pkg-java/trunk/solr stating that the packaging has been moved to a

Re: Any plan to update java3d

2009-08-11 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Jonny Lambjo...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 13:52:08 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: After reading some old mails from 'Barak A. Pearlmutter' when he sponsored my first package and the manpage of svn-buildpackage I figured out what the problem is. I set two

Re: Any plan to update java3d

2009-08-11 Thread Jonny Lamb
On Tue, Aug 11, 19:42:01 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: By the way, you forgot to tag the release. Never mind. I will do it. Oops, sorry about that. thanks for tagging it. -- Jonny Lamb, UK jo...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: RFS: azureus (updated package, fixes RC bug)

2009-08-11 Thread Adrian Perez
Sorry about the pixmap size, gimp really played at me on this ;) I've fixed all warnings, and now the package is entirely lintian clean (even with --pedantic). IMHO it's ready for uploading. On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 14:07 +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote: On Fri Aug 07 12:15, Adrian Perez wrote:

RFS: excalibur-logkit 2.0-1

2009-08-11 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi all, I am looking for sponsor for my package excalibur-logkit. The package is a build-dep for Jmeter. I have merged the package from Ubuntu and made necessary changes to fit it in Debian. The packaging bits are present in pkg-java svn. I request that the orig.tar.gz be taken from Ubuntu [1]