RFS: libxmlenc-java

2009-12-04 Thread Thomas Koch
The library is a dependency of Hadoop, see Hadoop RFP[1] and Ubuntu Infos on Hadoop packaging[2]. Please be so kind to have a look at http://github.com/thkoch2001/pkg-debian-libxmlenc-java The package builds, is lintian clean and installs. Is it helpful for you, if I also upload it to

Re: Which Debian package has which Java package?

2009-12-04 Thread Thomas Koch
Hi Torsten, you can try that on merkel. Getting the jar files: thanks for the hint, but since I'm not a DD, I think I can't access merkel. Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

pkg-java-maintainers vs. debian-java list

2009-12-04 Thread Thomas Koch
Hi, Just FYI: After wondering, why I receive only a subset of debian-java related mails, I now also subscribed to debian-java, not only to pkg-java-maintainers. It took me a while to find out that I subscribed to the wrong mailing list. Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Which Debian package has which Java package?

2009-12-04 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi Thomas, Thomas Koch schrieb: thanks for the hint, but since I'm not a DD, I think I can't access merkel. but the filesystem structure is the same on all mirrors except for $ROOT_OF_DEBIAN_MIRROR which should be a parameter. If you want to prepare the scripts and I am willing to test

Re: RFS: libxmlenc-java

2009-12-04 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro wrote: The library is a dependency of Hadoop, see Hadoop RFP[1] and Ubuntu Infos on Hadoop packaging[2]. Please be so kind to have a look at http://github.com/thkoch2001/pkg-debian-libxmlenc-java The package builds, is lintian

Re: RFS: libxmlenc-java

2009-12-04 Thread Thomas Koch
Is there any particular reason why the packaging bits are not maintained in the Debian infrastructure? [1] Yes. I'm not a DD and can not setup a GIT repository on git.debian.org But I'd love, if someone would pull it to git.d.o Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: RFS: libxmlenc-java

2009-12-04 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro wrote: Is there any particular reason why the packaging bits are not maintained in the Debian infrastructure? [1] Yes. I'm not a DD and can not setup a GIT repository on git.debian.org But I'd love, if someone would pull it to git.d.o

Re: RFS: libxmlenc-java

2009-12-04 Thread Torsten Werner
Thomas Koch schrieb: Yes. I'm not a DD and can not setup a GIT repository on git.debian.org Please go to http://alioth.debian.org, create an account and click at https://alioth.debian.org/project/request.php?group_id=30085. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

repackaging, git, version suffix

2009-12-04 Thread Thomas Koch
With xmlenc[1] and my work on SOLR[2], I filtered out all .jar and pregenerated docs coming from upstream when importing to GIT. So the upstream tarball gets repackaged. Now I saw, that in the eclipse GIT repository[3] there's one tag upstream/3.5.1 and another one upstream/3.5.1+repack. I

[ARM] openjdk: zero/shark

2009-12-04 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Hello, I'm testing java support on an ARMv5 devel board; zero performance is a bit low (ok, I was expecting this) and cacao seems to have troubles with Derby (I still have to look into this one), so I was investigating shark. In README.Debian I read that: On some architectures (currently armel