done Re: [RFS] libmiglayout-java

Thanks! Am 31.12.20 um 18:47 schrieb Pierre Gruet: > dcut dm --uid "Pierre Gruet" --allow libmiglayout-java

Re: [RFS] libfastutil-java and libreflections-java

done On 22.10.20 07:32, Pierre Gruet wrote: > dcut dm --uid "Pierre Gruet" --allow libfastutil-java libreflections-java

Re: guava - updateable?

On 02.09.19 16:30, tony mancill wrote: As a next step, how about we build a Guava 28 .deb locally (ignoring the build-deps problem for the moment) to assess the state of the r-deps? That should help inform us on which approach to take. I can work on this, although it likely will be about a

Re: guava - updateable?

Hi all, On 02.09.19 13:14, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 30/08/2019 à 05:31, tony mancill a écrit : I use Guava often at my job, and in my experience guava updates are safe. The updates don't cause regressions and only rarely include breaking API changes (which are trivial to port). Actually,

guava - updateable?

Hello, I need an update for the guava libraries from https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/guava-libraries/blob/master/debian/changelog and don't really use them, yet. Is there anybody volunteering to update those libraries? Can I otherwise update them without risking anything? Cheers, Steffen

Re: Please remove repository the now outdated java-team/milib (package was moved to med-team)

Hello, I was the one who once thought to have done well to create the java package with the Java repository. But Andreas is right. Please have it moved. I cannot remote the repository I created, either. Many thanks! Steffen On 12.02.19 14:35, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, the description of

libjoptsimple-java - new upstream 5.0.4 in git (current 4.5)

Hello, This jopt-simple library is apparently one of the better-known libraries and we are somewhat stuck with a two year old version. I just uploaded 5.0.4, upstream is alpha with version 6. Do we need to keep version 4.x? As tempted as I am to say "yes", the reverse dependencies natbraille and

Re: Java Team blog

Hello, On 05/05/16 13:28, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hello! > > [Are you subscribed to debian-java? Then I don't need to CC you.] > > Am 05.05.2016 um 05:17 schrieb Christopher Hoskin: >> Thanks for setting up the blog. >> >> Regarding "Outlook, goals and request for help", I'm interested in >>

Re: About Jenkins in Debian

Is there possibly involve upstream in some way? Maybe with a Sprint? You would together find out how to automate the generation of upload-ready packages and also pass the credentials. Best, Steffen On 11/01/16 16:56, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote: > Hi, > > I also think a clean cut is a good solution.

Uploaded - Aw: RFS: jftp/1.52+dfsg-3

Hi Emmanuel, I just uploaded. Many thanks Steffen Gesendet: Montag, 07. Juli 2014 um 00:43 Uhr Von: Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org An: Debian Java debian-java@lists.debian.org Betreff: RFS: jftp/1.52+dfsg-3 Hi all, I prepared an update of the jftp package and I'm looking for a

Aw: RFS: clirr/0.6-5

Uploaded! Steffen Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. November 2013 um 17:10 Uhr Von: Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org An: Debian Java debian-java@lists.debian.org Betreff: RFS: clirr/0.6-5 Hi all, I have updated the clirr package and I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it. Here is the

Aw: Re: plexus-utils upgrade

Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Oktober 2013 um 10:28 Uhr Von: Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org An: debian-java@lists.debian.org Betreff: Re: Aw: plexus-utils upgrade Le 23/10/2013 22:08, Steffen Möller a écrit : First off - I am impressed. Then, there will with some good confidence

Aw: plexus-utils upgrade

Hi Emmanuel, We have two versions of plexus-utils in Debian, the version 1.5.15 used by Maven 2 in the plexus-utils package, and the version 2.0.5 used by Maven 3.0.x in the plexus-utils2 package. Maven 3.1 uses plexus-utils 3.0.x. After some investigation it seems we could use a single

2/2014 Debian Med Sprint to foster link to pkg-java?

Hello, The Debian Med folks meet in Aberdeen, UK, next year. We have quite a couple of Java programs that await our packaging or that we got stuck to bring to our distro at some point. I thought it would be nice to see a few of those problematic ones tackled together, maybe someone deeper into

Any takers already? Aw: RFS: jmagick/6.6.9~20130201-svn99-1

Hello, I'll go for it if there has nobody else addressed the upload, yet. Best, Steffen Gesendet: Montag, 07. Oktober 2013 um 16:49 Uhr Von: Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org An: Debian Java debian-java@lists.debian.org Betreff: RFS: jmagick/6.6.9~20130201-svn99-1 Hi all, I updated the

Aw: Re: RFS: maven-plugin-tools/2.8-3

Hmmm http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/maven-plugin-tools.git This is why I was confused. It looks like Thomas Koch converted the packaging at some point (March of 2013?) and I had cloned it. I'll get the change from SVN and upload, but we should kill one of

Aw: Re: Re: [pkg-fso-maint] RFS: androidsdk-tools 22+git20130416~f55ffbb-1 (new)

Hello, Otherwise it seems fine. Please think about my comments above for a minute and give some feedback. If I do not hear from you, I would later tonight feel like uploading to experimental as a start. Thank you, experimental upload would be really nice. Uploaded - to unstable. Now

Aw: Re: Re: Re: [pkg-fso-maint] RFS: androidsdk-tools 22+git20130416~f55ffbb-1 (new)

Oh, I see some misunderstanding in what Android SDK *Tools* are. Sadly they won't help you much with developing and compiling Android applications. These are more of a debugging and profiling tools that allow you to connect to running Android device, inspect what processes are running

Aw: Re: [pkg-fso-maint] RFS: androidsdk-tools 22+git20130416~f55ffbb-1 (new)

Gesendet: Samstag, 17. August 2013 um 19:12 Uhr Von: Steffen Möller steffen_moel...@gmx.de ... @Jakub, everyone is slightly afraid since the package is rather big and it is all a bit a step to the side from our routines. My suggestion is to link up with pkg-java as a start, where I

Aw: Re: [pkg-fso-maint] RFS: androidsdk-tools 22+git20130416~f55ffbb-1 (new)

Hi Sebastian, hi Timo, Thank you both for your kind replies. Gesendet: Samstag, 17. August 2013 um 14:04 Uhr Von: Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi An: Sebastian Reichel s...@debian.org Cc: Jakub Adam jakub.a...@ktknet.cz, debian-java@lists.debian.org,

Aw: RFC on removing libiscwt-java

Hi, Gesendet: Freitag, 28. Juni 2013 um 17:31 Uhr Von: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net An: Debian Java List debian-java@lists.debian.org Cc: moel...@debian.org Betreff: RFC on removing libiscwt-java Hi, I have been considering to remove libiscwt-java from unstable - it has low popcon

Re: [pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers] RFS: libandroid-json-org-java/20121204-20090211-1 [ITP]

Hi Thomas, I just go for it. Cheers, Steffen Original-Nachricht Datum: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 21:20:54 +0100 Von: Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro An: debian-java@lists.debian.org CC: Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org, Thierry Carrez thierry.car...@ubuntu.com,

Re: [pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers] progress report on gwt 2.5.0

Hallo Thomas, bin gerade fuer mehr als sponsoring nicht zu gebrauchen. Dank Dir fuer Deine Arbeit. Ich nehme mal an, dass Charles und Brian sich bei Dir melden werden. Aber beide haben auch viele Dinge um die Ohren. LG Steffen - Ursprüngliche Nachricht - Von: Thomas Koch

Re: [pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers] GWT2 packaging

I agree, no prob for me since I am with pkg-java already. And given my limited history in gwt maintenance it is very kind of yours to have asked in the first place. The number of esp. external contributors will be lower in git ... if a move towards that could be delayed? Many thanks and