On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 09:53:22PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi
After having looked at kaffe I have noticed it seems lacks maintenance
both from the Debian side but also upstream seems rather dead. We got an
120 days old FTBFS RC bug (#529872) and alternatives exists. So I
figured perhaps
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Michael Koch konque...@gmx.de wrote:
Yes, we need to remove kaffe. I think we dont need bugs against te packages
maintained by pkg-java. I will work on them and remove (build-)deps on kaffe
in the next days.
thanks. The current list of packages:
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 01:53:24PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Michael Koch konque...@gmx.de wrote:
Yes, we need to remove kaffe. I think we dont need bugs against te packages
maintained by pkg-java. I will work on them and remove (build-)deps on
Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi
After having looked at kaffe I have noticed it seems lacks maintenance
both from the Debian side but also upstream seems rather dead. We got an
120 days old FTBFS RC bug (#529872) and alternatives exists. So I
figured perhaps it was time to retire kaffe from the
Hi
After having looked at kaffe I have noticed it seems lacks maintenance
both from the Debian side but also upstream seems rather dead. We got an
120 days old FTBFS RC bug (#529872) and alternatives exists. So I
figured perhaps it was time to retire kaffe from the repositories.
I have appended
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
Hi
After having looked at kaffe I have noticed it seems lacks maintenance
both from the Debian side but also upstream seems rather dead. We got an
120 days old FTBFS RC bug (#529872) and alternatives exists. So I
figured
6 matches
Mail list logo
