Re: Java packages in main depending on non-free java.

2009-09-19 Thread Eric Lavarde
Torsten Werner wrote: This is a false positive because the first alternative dep is openjdk-6-jre. Same for libjibx-java... Eric Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Java packages in main depending on non-free java.

2009-09-19 Thread Niels Thykier
Eric Lavarde wrote: Torsten Werner wrote: This is a false positive because the first alternative dep is openjdk-6-jre. Same for libjibx-java... Eric Cheers, Torsten I checked the remaining ones and it turned out all of them were false positives, except the one Torsten already fixed.

Re: Java packages in main depending on non-free java.

2009-09-16 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Kalle Kivimaa kalle.kivi...@iki.fi wrote: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes: I went through the list of our public packages listed here[1] and it turns out that we have 7 packages depending on a non-free version of java (as an alternative to a free or a

Re: Java packages in main depending on non-free java.

2009-09-16 Thread Michael Koch
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:25:15PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Kalle Kivimaa kalle.kivi...@iki.fi wrote: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes: I went through the list of our public packages listed here[1] and it turns out that we have 7 packages depending

Re: Java packages in main depending on non-free java.

2009-09-16 Thread Torsten Werner
replying to debian-java On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote: libjgroups-java:        Varun Hiremath (u)        Torsten Werner (u) I have uploaded a fixed package. weka:        Soeren Sonnenburg (u)        Torsten Werner (u) This is a false positive