On 13.12.2017 11:13, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi Dalibor,
Le 01/12/2017 à 11:12, dalibor topic a écrit :
That won't work with 10 either, unfortunately, since the old doclet has
(finally) been removed. Please see
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177511 for details.
There is an
Hi Dalibor,
Le 01/12/2017 à 11:12, dalibor topic a écrit :
> That won't work with 10 either, unfortunately, since the old doclet has
> (finally) been removed. Please see
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177511 for details.
There is an undocumented --ignore-source-errors flag in
On 30.11.2017 15:08, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
If there is no hurry to remove javah I suggest waiting until JDK 12 to
do so, this would increase our chances to include JDK 11 in the next
Debian release.
I don't think that hurry is necessarily a factor here, given that javah
would have been
On 30.11.2017 14:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 30/11/2017 à 10:27, dalibor topic a écrit :
Thanks, Emmanuel - in many of these cases (AspectJ, ICU, Spotbugs,
Gradle, Scala) the way forward seems to be to upgrade the packaged
software to the latest upstream version supporting JDK 9, often
Le 29/11/2017 à 14:32, dalibor topic a écrit :
> Does java-package work for JDK 10 EA builds?
Not yet but it definitely will.
> An alternative to javah has been available with the -h flag for javac since
> JDK 8
Great, so we can start the transition now. It might be nice to add some
examples
Le 30/11/2017 à 10:27, dalibor topic a écrit :
> Thanks, Emmanuel - in many of these cases (AspectJ, ICU, Spotbugs,
> Gradle, Scala) the way forward seems to be to upgrade the packaged
> software to the latest upstream version supporting JDK 9, often thanks
> to the patches provided by Chris West
On 29.11.2017 14:22, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 29/11/2017 à 13:30, dalibor topic a écrit :
I think what makes Debian GNU/Linux interesting for us regarding the
OpenJDK Quality Outreach is that it's one of the first Linux
distributions to do mass rebuilds of its (quite substantial) package
On 29.11.2017 12:46, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 29/11/2017 à 10:32, dalibor topic a écrit :
I'd agree with Matthias that the binaries of some builds are not by
themselves newsworthy for the debian-java mailing list specifically,
since Debian doesn't use third party binaries in its Java
Le 29/11/2017 à 13:30, dalibor topic a écrit :
> I think what makes Debian GNU/Linux interesting for us regarding the
> OpenJDK Quality Outreach is that it's one of the first Linux
> distributions to do mass rebuilds of its (quite substantial) package
> archive with JDK 9. So it has the means and
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:46:20PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 29/11/2017 à 10:32, dalibor topic a écrit :
> > If not, then I'd suggest stopping further early access announcements
> > mails to this mailing list, Rory, and sending them to Emmanuel directly
> > instead, while anyone else
On 29.11.2017 10:20, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
From my experience on other lists also receiving these
notifications I know this is a good opportunity to gather and take into
account the community feedback.
That's the general idea, yeah!
A list of FOSS projects participating in the OpenJDK
Le 29/11/2017 à 10:32, dalibor topic a écrit :
> I'd agree with Matthias that the binaries of some builds are not by
> themselves newsworthy for the debian-java mailing list specifically,
> since Debian doesn't use third party binaries in its Java packaging.
Actually these binaries can be turned
I think that as soon as someone objects to having mail sent to a public
list, the sending should end.
I'd agree with Matthias that the binaries of some builds are not by
themselves newsworthy for the debian-java mailing list specifically,
since Debian doesn't use third party binaries in its
Hi Rory,
Le 29/11/2017 à 10:01, Rory O'Donnell a écrit :
> If you want me to stop sending emails to this list let me know ?
I'm personally glad that you send these emails to the debian-java list.
They are sent barely once or twice a month and contain useful
information. From my experience on
Hi Emmanuel,
If you want me to stop sending emails to this list let me know ?
Rgds,Rory
On 29/11/2017 08:12, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 29/11/2017 à 02:16, Matthias Klose a écrit :
is it really necessary to have these advertisements of Oracle's binary only,
architecture limited builds on a
Le 29/11/2017 à 02:16, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> is it really necessary to have these advertisements of Oracle's binary only,
> architecture limited builds on a mailing list of a community project dedicated
> to build binaries from sources? I can't find such advertisements on e.g.
> mailing
Rory, Dalibor,
is it really necessary to have these advertisements of Oracle's binary only,
architecture limited builds on a mailing list of a community project dedicated
to build binaries from sources? I can't find such advertisements on e.g.
mailing lists for the Fedora project either.
17 matches
Mail list logo
