Re: Kaffe's GPL and GPL incompatible Java software [Was: Undistributable java in main]

2003-11-03 Thread Andrew Suffield
. Implementation of a specification does not usually constitute copyright infringement of the specification, for example, because there's no copying/distribution involved. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: Kaffe's GPL and GPL incompatible Java software [Was: Undistributable java in main]

2003-11-03 Thread Andrew Suffield
[This is no longer particularly important] On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:37:49AM -0500, Etienne Gagnon wrote: Andrew Suffield wrote: Kaffe is essentially a filter that takes java bytecode as input and emits program code on the fly (this is technically incomplete, but effectively equivalent

Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe

2005-01-13 Thread Andrew Suffield
from? You've got the causality backwards here. The program is linked to the libraries because it is a derivative of the libraries. Not the other way around. Derivation is something that happens when you *write* the program. Not when you build it. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew

Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe

2005-01-13 Thread Andrew Suffield
irrelevancy. Using an API is just a method for utilising part of another work. It may or may not be a derivative. This is just a variation on the 'linker' noise. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe

2005-01-14 Thread Andrew Suffield
relevant. Given that eclipse runs on other JVMs, I'm inclined to expect that it isn't a derivative of any of them, but I really have no idea. That's the only question here which matters though. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org