Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PS It would be nice if you could change debian/rules to set
-demosdir /usr/share/qt4/demos \
-examplesdir /usr/share/qt4/examples \
as the current qmake binary has the rather awkward paths
/usr/demos
/usr/examples
Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Brian Nelson wrote:
Evgeni Golov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
are there any updates on this? I maintain pokerth which needs qmake4,
libqt4-core and libqt4-gui, but not -sql, -qt3support etc.
At the moment it build
Evgeni Golov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
are there any updates on this? I maintain pokerth which needs qmake4,
libqt4-core and libqt4-gui, but not -sql, -qt3support etc.
At the moment it build-depends on libqt4-dev which fetches way too much
stuff in during building, what is annoying :)
Jan Michael Alonzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi! I'm currently trying to build gnome + webkit without distro-specific
packages. But for this I need qmake which is part of libqt4-dev. The problem
is libqt4 is built with -glib enabled. Is there a reaason why qt4-dev needs
glib? And also, if
ZhengPeng Hou [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hi all,
I've already splited scim-brodge into scom-brodge-agent
scim-brodge-client-gtk, scim-bridge-client-qt, and scim-bridge(a
dumy package for upgrade), but now the upstream has added qt4
support, so shall I split it into five? likde
Tim Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 19:48 -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Brian Nelson wrote:
Use QT += opengl, not CONFIG. See the Qt4 qmake documentation for
more info.
Thanks for the tip; QT += opengl (instead of CONFIG += opengl) does
exactly what I
severity 392902 important
thanks
I'm downgrading this since a workaround has been presented, and I don't
think it's affecting the build of many packages.
Perhaps this should be closed since it sounds like a permanent change
from upstream?
--
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
--
To
Roman Zippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Is there any progress here?
If there is anything I can do to help, please ask, but please don't ignore
this bug...
Thanks.
Sorry, I was just dealing with RC bugs first...
To what file should those lines be added? There isn't a buildd log for
Peter Schwindt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: libqt4-dev
Version: 4.2.0-1
Severity: normal
libqt4-dev needs libsqlite-dev in order to compile some software (f.e.
psi)
Dependency is missing, I had to reinstall by hand.
Err, which libsqlite-dev package (libsqlite0-dev or
Steve M. Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: libqt4-dev
Version: 4.2.0-1
Severity: grave
Hello,
Ipe uses qmake to build, with a config.pri file that contains the
following:
IPEDOCDIR = $${IPEPREFIX}/share/doc/ipe/doc
Back in July, the generated Makefile resulted in
Tobias Toedter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 06 October 2006 04:01, Brian Nelson wrote:
Tobias Toedter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you aware of this problem? Is anyone trying to compile qt4
with -DQT_QLOCALE_USES_FCVT on arm, to see if the problem can be
solved?
Not me... Did
Tobias Toedter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: libqt4-dev
Version: 4.1.4-1.1
Severity: normal
Hi,
my package qbrew FTBFS on arm, it links against libqt4. The reason for the
build failure is a time out while running this command:
/usr/bin/uic-qt4 src/calcconfig.ui -o
Margarita Manterola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
Georg Baum reopened bug 327618, since apparently libqt4-dev
stopped having the needed dependency on libpq-dev.
I've been checking the packages on snapshot.debian.org, and found out that
the dependency was dropped on 4.1.0-2, the relevant
Martin Gruner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please make libqt4-sql support sqlite3. Currently it only links against
sqlite2. Trying to use the sqlite3 backend does not work. Thanks.
ldd libQtSql.so | grep sqlite
libsqlite.so.0 = /usr/lib/libsqlite.so.0 (0xa7cd3000) #sqlite2
sqlite3
Michael Bann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The exact error message is the following:
Preparing to replace libqt4-gui 4.1.3-3 (using
.../libqt4-gui_4.1.4-1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libqt4-gui ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libqt4-gui_4.1.4-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
tag 368883 + pending
thanks
Le Sam 3 Juin 2006 10:57, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
Hi,
Could this be fixed any time soon? qt4-x11 is currently blocking no
less than 83 packages.
Samuel
that one is quite annoying.
Brian: will you have time to
Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
gcc ICEd when attempting to build qt4-x11 on alpha on 2006-05-14. I
don't know what's the issue and what could fix. However, 4.1.2-1 built
and the changes to -2 seem minimal, so it should be easy to check
whether there was a gcc regression or the
Hi Benjamin,
Both of these bugs you reported were regressions in 4.1.1. Can you test
the 4.1.2 packages and see if either of these bugs are fixed there?
--
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
This is scheduled to be fixed upstream for 4.2.0:
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/task-tracker/index_html?method=entryid=111573
(assuming the debug default on linux is a bug)
--
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Arnaud Cornet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since libqt4-dev 4.1.1-1, /usr/share/qt4/mkspecs/qconfig.pri adds
debug to CONFIG by default.
Is this expected behavior ?
Well, it's what upstream does by default. Whether it's intentional or
correct, I'm not so sure...
--
Captain Logic is not
Thomas Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Dienstag, den 07.03.2006, 18:21 -0800 schrieb Brian Nelson:
Thomas Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
The relevant error message from config.log:
==
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lQtAssistantClient
==
Indeed, the qt4
Thomas Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
The relevant error message from config.log:
==
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lQtAssistantClient
==
Indeed, the qt4 packages don't contain this lib, whereas a local qt4
build has them.
I have installed every package with qt4 in its
Anthony Awtrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was just about to report this as a bug in the packaging of the qt4-x11
files, so I'll just append your report. We saw that when we linked to
the debug libs we got animated gif and mng support, but with the
optimized libs they didn't work. There are
Steve Halasz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To build qgis from CVS (--with-qtdir=/usr/share/qt4) I need a symlink
from /usr/share/qt4/bin/rcc to /usr/bin/rcc. I could work around this
in qgis, but it seems reasonable to have the link there.
Sure, I'll add it in the next upload.
--
Captain Logic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: libqt4-sql
Version: 4.1.0-3
Hi, when i try to use this lib in my software I get:
linuxmake
g++ -o prova main.o -L/usr/lib -lQtSql -lQtGui -lQtCore -lpthread
/usr/lib/libQtSql.so: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
/usr/lib/libQtSql.so:
severity 348092 wishlist
thanks
Russell Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: libqt4-gui
Version: 4.0.1-5
Severity: important
Woah, hey now, don't you think that severity is a little over-inflated?
I understand that by default the Qt configure script disables gif
support. It can be
Thorvald Natvig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could you add sqlite3 support to Qt? The source is included in the Qt
distribution, so it's just a matter of adding -qt-sql-sqlite to the
configure string.
Already added to 4.1.0-2, which is currently sitting in the NEW queue
and should become
Isaac Clerencia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
qt4 is FTBFS'ing in ARM with the following problem:
kernel/qapplication_x11.cpp: In function 'void
qt_init(QApplicationPrivate*, int, Display*, Qt::HANDLE, Qt::HANDLE)':
kernel/qapplication_x11.cpp:1547: error: no matching function for call
Cédric [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I tryed to use 'pkg-config --cflags QtCore' to compile a little program with
qt4, but this give me that line :
-DQT_SHARED -I/usr/include/qt4
Because in QT4, all headers are splited in subdirectory according to their
module, if I use this include
severity 347251 important
thanks
Nach M. S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since the upgrade to Qt 4.1.0, I noticed icons pretty much everywhere
have disappeared. For example, load up Designer, aside from the Window
icon, icons everywhere else such as tool bar or for the item pains and
menus have
Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An update of libqt4-debug to 4.1 (which was still 4.0.1 before) fixed
this issue and brought it down to bug 346586.
So probably libqt4-dev 4.1 should conflict with libqt4-debug = 4.0.1?
Conflicts with earlier versions are frowned upon in policy (7.3).
Ian Wienand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 01:39:13PM +0200, Brian Nelson wrote:
Ian Wienand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
(gdb) back
#0 0x21363d81 in __pthread_sigsuspend (set=0x6fbf7270)
at ../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/pt
Hadmut Danisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 06:08:00PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
Does the new version, 4.1.0, which just hit unstable today, look better
to you?
Yup, now there is a menu bar.
But shouldn't there be a status bar at the bottom as well
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
when I start the qt4 designer, I get the full workbench, everything
seems ok. But when starting a new form and choosing a main window,
the created window is just empty. Regarding to the docs it should have
the usual decoration such as a menu bar. It should be
Marc Glisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
qmake adds -L/usr/lib to (the beginning of) LIBS. This is unneeded, and
actually causes many problems.
I agree it's unneeded, but what problems does it cause?
--
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Petr Mensik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there any reason why Qt Assistant does have any Menuitem in some
debian Xserver menus? In KDE menu i didnt found any of Qt Designer, Qt
Linguist, or Qt Assistant. That doest bother me much, as its under
Debian subtree. Still i think it might be there,
Ian Wienand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
(gdb) back
#0 0x21363d81 in __pthread_sigsuspend (set=0x6fbf7270)
at ../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/pt-sigsuspend.c:32
#1 0x21362380 in __pthread_wait_for_restart_signal
(self=0x2137edc8) at
Christian Welzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm currently developing an application on qt4 and wondered why qt doesnt
complain about not existing signals/slots during connect().
After trying to compile the stuff myself i discovered this:
[...]
As you can see the build process does not compile
tag 341658 fixed-upstream
thanks
Torsten Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The functions
QBitArray operator(const QBitArray , const QBitArray );
QBitArray operator|(const QBitArray , const QBitArray );
QBitArray operator^(const QBitArray , const QBitArray );
are missing from libQtCore.so.
Artur Wiebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, I could not find anything. I've just played around with this: A
QTreeWidget with setContextMenuPolicy(Qt::CustomContextMenu) and the signal
customContextMenuRequested(const QPoint) connected to a my_slot(const
QPoint) which looks like
void
Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Building QT4 apps using
CONFIG += debug
breaks the loading of any icons in the application. Remove debug and
everythings fine. This not only happens to the icons created for that
app, but also for the icons in standard dialog, like the QFileDialog.
tag 337764 confirmed
thanks
Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 18.11.05 10:20:54, Brian Nelson wrote:
Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Building QT4 apps using
CONFIG += debug
breaks the loading of any icons in the application. Remove debug and
everythings fine
tag 327359 upstream
thanks
This actual bug is filed as
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/tasktracker.html?method=entryid=87775
upstream, scheduled to be fixed in 4.1.1.
--
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Artur Wiebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When opening a popup menu with QMenu::exec() and clicking left outside
of the menu exec() returns not 0 as I would expect it. If this is not a
bug, sry for wasting your time.
It does sound like a bug. Did you search the bug reports on
Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
today I was struck by designer and release vs. debug built of Qt4. I
have a Custom Widget which is visible in designer when I have no logic
in it. But it completely breaks designer if I put the real code in it,
the solution to this is that the widget
jjluza [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le Dimanche 6 Novembre 2005 23:59, cedric a écrit :
I had the same problem. but after restarting my computer, all works well.
And I can't reproduce it.
For my part, I still get the problem after restarting.
Does removing ~/.designer and restarting fix it?
José Ramón Álvarez Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After trying to build a external program that uses libxxf86vm
and with a line QT += qt3support in the .pro file for qmake,
i got linking errors about symbols XF86VidModeQueryVersion and
XF86VidModeGetModeLine not defined.
Just added
Jean-Christophe Dubacq [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When upgrading from 4.0.1-2 to 4.0.1-4, libqt4-gui tries to overwrite
libqjpeg.so:
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libqt4-gui_4.0.1-4_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/qt4/plugins/imageformats/libqjpeg.so',
Todd Goyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: libqt4-designer
Version: 4.0.1-2
Followup-For: Bug #325782
I restarted X and the problem has gone away. Odd.
Anyway, I would go ahead and close this one, because the problem seems
to fix itself.
Err, it is closed. ;)
--
Captain Logic is not
Sebastian Ley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
can someone enlighten me why libqt4-core needs libqt4-debug?
Probably because I screwed up and added _debug.so codec plugins to
libqt4-core...
--
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: qt-x11-free
Severity: normal
with the current qt3 package it is not possible anymore to create own
styles based on QWindowsStyle. Small test program:
#include qwindowsstyle.h
class MyStyle : public QWindowsStyle
{
Q_OBJECT
};
g++
tag 327359 confirmed
thanks
Sven Geggus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--cut--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:./tmp2 echo foo.pro
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:./tmp2 qmake foo.pro
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:./tmp2 grep ^LIBS Makefile
LIBS = $(SUBLIBS) -L/usr/lib
-L/tmp/buildd/qt4-x11-4.0.1/lib -lQtGui
Manuel Bilderbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Making qt4-x11 depend on libxinerama-dev, means that it depens on xorg.
This means that qt4 can only get into testing when the X transition is
completed.
I'm far from an expert on this, but are you sure you really want this?
I don't see the
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your package has a QtSql.pc and Qt3Support.pc pkg-config file
included. Packages using that fail to build because you're
atleast missing a dependency on libmysqlclient14-dev, and looks
like on libpq-dev too. Maybe some others?
Well, it suggests
Package: kdm
Version: 4:3.4.2-2
Severity: normal
I have the following line in my /etc/kde3/kdm/Xservers:
:0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/X11R6/bin/X -dpi 100 -nolisten tcp vt7
However, since my recent upgrade to the 3.4.2 packages, X no longer
starts with a dpi of 100--it either calculates the real
Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On September 3, 2005 19:31, Brian Nelson wrote:
Package: kdm
Version: 4:3.4.2-2
Severity: normal
I have the following line in my /etc/kde3/kdm/Xservers:
:0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/X11R6/bin/X -dpi 100 -nolisten tcp vt7
However, since my recent
tag 325782 confirmed
thanks
Jan Christoph Uhde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All menus and frames are empty.
Please take a look at the screen shot (
http://rapidshare.de/files/4547925/designer-qt4.png.html ).
Probably the bug should be reported against the qt4-dev-tools package, but i
am not
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 10:46:28AM +0200, Petr Šimon wrote:
Sorry, I was about to, only I was away yesterday when the
Acknowledgement came. I enclose strace and valgrind output. To be honest
I am not very good in debugging and gdb shows only no debugging symbols.
I have the libqt4-debug
vincenzo pisani [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
first of all thanks for your great work.
Now go to the question.
I'm try to using the new Qt4.
If compiling it by myself with:
./configure -system-libjpeg -.
or
without -system-libjpeg
i can found in plugin directory
# Lowering the severity because I can't reproduce this bug
severity 321228 important
tag 321228 unreproducible
thanks
Petr Šimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Assistant segfaults after few seconds after launch, designer segfaults
when trying to open form right after file dialog opens.
Can you
tag 319456 confirmed
thanks
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 10:32:17AM +0200, Jose Antonio wrote:
from /etc/cron.daily/man-db:
mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/moc.1.gz is a dangling symlink
mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/uic.1.gz is a dangling symlink
mandb: warning:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 09:42:49PM -0400, Josh Metzler wrote:
Actually, it sounds like libaspell15 doesn't export any C++ symbols, and so
didn't need to do a transition. It is likely going to undo the package
name change and go back to libaspell15.
I'll provide both libaspell15 and
Jan Niehusmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Compiling a simple test program with qt4 failed with this error message:
$ qmake
$ make
(cd /src/tools/moc make)
/bin/sh: line 0: cd: /src/tools/moc: No such file or directory
make: *** [/usr/bin/moc] Error 1
The reason is, that I somehow ended
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 11:20:09PM +0300, Mattias Nordstrom wrote:
Brian Nelson wrote:
I have some debs of 4.0.0 built but I need to test them. I think
they're kinda broken because some stuff has moved around and changed
since beta2. Hopefully I'll have something usable and ready
(Qt3)?
Brian Nelson filed an ITP (bug #306694, CCed) for qt4 a while ago, and has
experimental packages up at http://people.debian.org/~pyro/experimental/ ,
but they seem to still be debs of beta2.
Any progress on the ITP now that qt4 has been released?
I have some debs of 4.0.0 built but I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: qt-x11-opensource
Version : 4.0 beta 2
Upstream Author : Trolltech AS
* URL or Web page : http://www.trolltech.com
* License : Dual GPL/QPL
Description : Qt 4 cross-platform C++ application framework
Qt is a
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bug #218971 describes some unclear interaction between licq (which uses
Qt as user interface), Qt, and the kernel.
I can't reproduce that bug, FWIW.
I don't understand a word of what it says there. The previous
maintainer of licq solved this
Chris Cheney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You also seem to ignore non-multithreaded use of the qt libraries,
even though there are still applications depending on this. You seem
to not want to support embedded cross-development, again without
considering people who need this.
There are only
Chris Cheney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 05:43:33PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
Why do you insist so stubbornly on maintaining the package? You don't
take very good care of it, and you've said in the past that you don't
even do any Qt development.
If you saw Qt
Dominique Devriese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian Nelson writes:
qt3-dev-tools: a number of binaries ( note: architecture dependent,
so you don't want them in an arch independent headers package ) for
normal development with Qt
Who said we need a arch-indep headers package anyway? I
Dominique Devriese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One of the reasons I'm so ornery when it comes to the Debian Qt
packages is that much of this stuff was discussed before the split
and there seemed to be a consensus that there were a lot of problems
with it, yet it was done anyway without heeding
Dominique Devriese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian Nelson writes:
Chris Cheney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 05:43:33PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
Why do you insist so stubbornly on maintaining the package? You
don't take very good care of it, and you've said
Dominique Devriese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian Nelson writes:
Summarizing: Qt is a very complex package, and there are good
reasons for most, if not all split-ups.
I'm still unconvinced of that.
Fine, I'm not going to keep arguing with you over this. IMHO, as
you've demonstrated
Dominique Devriese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian Nelson writes:
IMO, the reason for the missing files is the ridiculous number of
superfluous packages Qt has been split into. Is it really
necessary to have libqt3-mt-dev, libqt3-headers,
libqt3-compat-headers, qt3-dev-tools, qt3-designer
Martin Loschwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, you must only be talking about qt3-assistant, qt3-qtconfig,
qt3-linguist, and qt3-designer.
What you've said doesn't apply to headers, and who the hell knows
what the difference between qt3-dev-tools, qt3-apps-dev, etc. is
anyway?
Martin Loschwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Developers, please test these packages heavily and report anything you see --
whether the packages work fine, whether they fix bugs you reported before, and
of course whether they rise new bugs. There are some minor things on my TODO;
if these
Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On June 13, 2004 12:44, Brian Nelson wrote:
For one, they're missing the qaccessible.h header. It appears to
missing from the 3.2.3 packages as well.
Martin, there seem to be a few other bugs open regarding missing files.
qvfbhdr.h is missing
Dominique Devriese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian Nelson writes:
Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On June 13, 2004 12:44, Brian Nelson wrote:
For one, they're missing the qaccessible.h header. It appears to
missing from the 3.2.3 packages as well.
Martin, there seem
Martin Loschwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Developers, please test these packages heavily and report anything you see --
whether the packages work fine, whether they fix bugs you reported before, and
of course whether they rise new bugs. There are some minor things on my TODO;
if these
Martin Loschwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, as already said -- I would love to see people help me; I am
thinking of doing a Qt 3.2.x upload to fix at least one of the two
outstanding release critical bugs. Additionally, re-enabling STL is
something one might take into consideration.
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 30 May 2004, Brian Nelson wrote:
Well, my packages are not yet fit for upload yet. They contain some
drastic changes that really need to be tested more.
Would it be possible to upload the latest version at least? That would
solve my
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[I'm Cc'ing the qt-kde packagers list for more input.]
On Sun, 30 May 2004, Brian Nelson wrote:
I've been maintaining my own Qt packages for some time at
http://bignachos.com/~nelson/debian . I've been considering hijacking
the Debian Qt packages
Ralf Nolden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
dpkg --purge --force-all kpilot
apt-get install kdepim-dev kpilot
Ugh. Please don't suggest using force-all; it's very dangerous.
force-depends is probably what you want in this case.
--
I had no feelings about it. It was aloof and licked itself too
Frank Van Damme [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 23:36, perlcgi2000 wrote:
Hi,
I'm doing some research into the usability of KDE.
Hopefully the results can be fed into the KDE
Usability project (http://usability.kde.org) and help
improve future versions of KDE.
The
Karolina Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think the README.Debian should be more accessible, and easier to read.
Maybe
it already is, and I just don't know how to do it? Something needed in the
KDE project would be to make such information easily available on a
mouse-click or
Chris Cheney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
m68k - really slow will have kde compiled probably in march or april
Just curious, but is anyone actually insane enough to run KDE on m68k?
--
My secret to happiness... is that I have a heart of a 12-year-old boy.
It's over here in a jar. Would you like
Chris Cheney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I compiled a list of non-kde applications that are still compiling
against libqt2. I then went through one by one and tried to compile
against libqt3 to see if they could be updated. In some cases a newer
version of the application is available that may
Pietro Calogero [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry to gum up your inboxes with yet one more email, but I wanted to
thank John Mitchell and Asheesh Laroya for responding to my SOS: I
broke my KDE and I can't get up email. All John wrote were four lines
of advice and that was all I needed.
Played
Chris Cheney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 07:27:54AM +0100, Ralf Nolden wrote:
Yes, there is. First of all, there are people using this stuff to develop
applications with. If you give them all available headers you will end up
having most apps accidentally using
Ralf Nolden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2003 09:59, Brian Nelson wrote:
So most upstream authors have no clue how to write apps in Qt and don't
look at the vast amount of documentation that come with it?
No, it means that most upstream authors don't expect styles
Josep Febrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--
L I N U X .~.
The Choice /V\
of a GNU /( )\
Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 05:29:24PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
Or, my variation of the question: Why not just build-depend on g++-3.2,
build the packages and their dependencies (anything other than Qt?)
explicitly with g++-3.2, and upload to unstable
Alan Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 20 October 2002 6:04 pm, Brian Nelson wrote:
That's what I said. I think Qt would be the only dependency that would
need to be recompiled. Presumably, you could use some name-mangling
scheme like attaching -gcc3.2 or something to the Qt
Andy Saxena [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:13:58AM +0200, Michael Stucki wrote:
Have a look at Mindterm which runs as a Java Applet on your favourite
Web-Server! :-)
Nice, but not open source :-}, but really nice!
The version in Debian is GPL, though newer
Alan Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 19 October 2002 4:48 pm, Noel Koethe wrote:
We will still wait for the gcc 3.2 transition for unstable.
I know that is what is happening - what nobody has answered completely yet is
WHY you can't put 2.95 compiled packages in to unstable
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
When I first use kde (2.1) I have notice that all my X resource
setting have no effect (unlike under an ordinary window manager and also
under gnome). Fortunately, after some intensive search I found that
there is a checkbox in the control
Doug Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Subject says it all. I'm running the freshest KDE .debs (3.0.3), but lately,
even though I have the Mosfet Liquid theme debs installed, I can't select
that theme in the Themes control panel applet. I get the Mosfet's Liquid
applet in the Control
Paul Cupis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 13 September 2002 12:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any light in the tunnel for kde3 being uploaded in Sid some day,
some year or so?
I might be sounding a bit negative but haven't seen any progress or some
sort of status from the
98 matches
Mail list logo
