Hi,
so far I haven't had a need to port away from Imlib1. Imlib was the fastest
image loading and rendering library and it works just fine.
Despite the name, Imlib2 is *not* a successor of Imlib1, it is a completely
different thing with a different (incompatible) feature set. And even Imlib2
El Domingo, 19 de Abril de 2009, Edward J. Shornock escribió:
* Carsten Pfeiffer pfeif...@kde.org [19-04-2009 23:46 EEST]:
[...]
What's actually the reason to remove Imlib1 (and can the removal be
stopped)?
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=522810
Please remove imlib
On 2009-04-19, Alejandro Exojo s...@badopi.org wrote:
El Domingo, 19 de Abril de 2009, Edward J. Shornock escribió:
* Carsten Pfeiffer pfeif...@kde.org [19-04-2009 23:46 EEST]:
[...]
What's actually the reason to remove Imlib1 (and can the removal be
stopped)?
See
3 matches
Mail list logo