Hi,
On 12/06/2012 02:51 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 13:58 +0100, Rik Theys wrote:
On 12/06/2012 01:29 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
It is not too difficult to fix up the conflicts. But this is a fairly
big change, so I think this bug should now be 'wontfix' for wheezy.
Sorry we
Control: reassign -1 src:linux 3.2.32-1
Control: retitle -1 disfunctional samsung backlight control on NP300E5X-A01
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 01:25:11 +0100, Kim Twain wrote:
Starting my computer (Samsung NP300E5X-A01, Intel Celeron B815 APU) the
brightness is set at its minimum; when I try to
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 src:linux 3.2.32-1
Bug #695320 [xorg] xorg: Brightness switches from minimum to maximum multiple
times a second
Bug reassigned from package 'xorg' to 'src:linux'.
No longer marked as found in versions xorg/1:7.7+1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forcemerge 693190 695320
Bug #693190 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd: [regression] Samsung series 9
backlit stopped working in 320-4 kernel
Bug #695320 [src:linux] disfunctional samsung backlight control on NP300E5X-A01
Added tag(s) pending.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:52:05 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Can you check which backlight driver is used on the other distros you
mentioned? Also which kernel versions?
Actually it seems this is a dupe of #693190, and should be fixed in the
next few days.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Hi Ben,
On 07.12.2012 03:16, Ben Hutchings wrote:
There are also some similar bug reports on bugzilla.kernel.org:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43370
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50011
Do either of those seem to match what you're seeing?
I did also see the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 695351 src:linux 3.2.32-1~bpo60+1
Bug #695351 [linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64] task stress: blocked for more
than 120 seconds
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64'
Bug reassigned from package
+++ Bastian Blank [2012-12-06 15:18 +0100]:
Hmm. I didn't get a copy of your original message - not sure why.
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:53:53PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
The binary packages and control files for intermediate stages do *not*
need to comply with normal policy.
Where is
[Re-sending with address typo corrected.]
There are 3 stable updates and various Debian-specific fixes pending,
so I think it's about time for a new version in unstable that could
be unblocked for testing. I intend to upload at some point this
weekend. Let me know if there's anything I should
Le Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:01:37 -0700
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com a écrit:
Hi,
gpe92 wrote:
Version: 3.4.4-1~experimental.1
[...]
I'm using an ASUS P867 LE moterboard with the last BIOS 3602 and in
messages I've :
That package is out of date. Could you try 3.5.2 or newer from
10 matches
Mail list logo