On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 10:04:54PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 03:14:12PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Does anyone see a problem w/ enabling the ide-scsi module for etch,
sid, trunk, etc?
Yes. Two modules claiming the same devices is a bad idea.
I would agree if both
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 02:10:50PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Yes. Two modules claiming the same devices is a bad idea.
I would agree if both were automatically loaded, but as far as I can
tell udev would only load ide-scsi if an ide-tape device is
discovered, and would never load ide-tape.
On 1 Apr at 21:46 Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 02:10:50PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Yes. Two modules claiming the same devices is a bad idea.
I would agree if both were automatically loaded, but as far as I can
tell udev would
for years, enabling ide-scsi is prrobably the more
pragmatic solution.
I have ide-scsi built/loaded into my otherwise standard etch system to drive
my tape, but it is not interfering with CD burning.
--
Tony van der Hoff| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Buckinghamshire, England
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 03:14:12PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Does anyone see a problem w/ enabling the ide-scsi module for etch,
sid, trunk, etc? #467291 claims its needed for ide-tape devices and
udev includes a rule for this case. I'd been hesitant to enable this
in etch for fear that
5 matches
Mail list logo