On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:39:26PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:29:26PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:04:17PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Dann
I see that it is not built yet.
Hi
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:29:26PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:04:17PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Dann
I see that it is not built yet.
http://stats.buildserver.net/packages/status.php?email=debian-kernelpackages=arches=subdist=kernel-dists
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 09:07:21PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
[...]
come with a risk of regression, and its easier to regression test
specific changes.
#508773:
Patch available in http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1054
Fix in
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:46:27PM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
Yet one more important fix while we're at it.
This fixes udev in a container, OpenVZ bug #1195. Not a security fix but
quite important functionality issue since many distros rely on udev by
default nowdays.
Thanks Kir. I've
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
Did you get it in the other mail I sent?
Best regards,
// Ola
none with a tarball.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi
Interesting I sent it about 15 seconds after the other one. Maybe
it was too big.
In any case I have uploaded the patches to
http://apt.inguza.org/vzkernel/
Best regards,
// Ola
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:37:05PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Kir
Thanks for the list. I have now made some work to apply this.
Below are some comments.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:00:39AM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
I am currently checking all the ~80 patches that are not in openvz
lenny kernel.
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Kir
Result from the import. Some comments and questions.
Building right now. Results will be available soon.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:17:47AM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
I am currently checking all the ~80 patches that are not in openvz
Hi Kir
Quoting Kir Kolyshkin k...@openvz.org:
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
[...]
http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.26-openvz;a=commitdiff;h=ce67d5b4cc85fa0c6a6d226d436276ab307ae041
iptables: setup init iptables mask before net initialization
Trivial fix for IPv6 iptables in container. Not an ABI
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:19:39PM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
So we can either disable IPv6 in config or fix it. It's up to you/Dann
to decide. I'd go with fixing.
Speaking of IPv6, we also have a bunch of patches for ipv6 conntracks in
containers which I haven't sent since it looks
Thanks for this clarification.
Kir, please list the corrections that you can find. If they are more
on improvement please mark that and we can discuss it further.
Best regards,
// Ola
Quoting maximilian attems m...@stro.at:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:19:39PM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Now I have gone though all the patches that Kir sent and are now doing
a test build of the proposed patch (attached).
just had some time to look at it, nothing attached, please send in ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Attached four patches fixes conntracks for IPv6.
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Thanks for this clarification.
Kir, please list the corrections that you can find. If they are more
on improvement please mark that and we can discuss it further.
Best regards,
// Ola
Quoting maximilian attems
Yet one more important fix while we're at it.
This fixes udev in a container, OpenVZ bug #1195. Not a security fix but
quite important functionality issue since many distros rely on udev by
default nowdays.
From 5dcfcf5defb9a1037de717f56a54f8cbb461e96d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Konstantin
Ok added as well. I'll make a new proposed patch soon.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:46:27PM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
Yet one more important fix while we're at it.
This fixes udev in a container, OpenVZ bug #1195. Not a security fix but
quite important functionality
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:13:24PM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
[...]
The double alloc should not be too much of a problem (or?), but the double
free, I assume, can result
in real problems, right?
Right. Tables are leaked.
Ok.
[...]
I hope that changelog will include something to uniquely identify the
patches that were included. The best thing would be to have git commit
IDs, but anything else that can be used to find out git commit id is
fine, too.
Note that commit ID can be shortened to say first 8 chars without a high
Hi
Did you get it in the other mail I sent?
Best regards,
// Ola
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 05:47:29PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Now I have gone though all the patches that Kir sent and are now doing
a test build of the proposed patch
Hi Kir
Do it need to be in the changelog? In the file debian/patches/series/14-extra
all the files are listed explicitly.
Would that be enough?
Best regards,
// Ola
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:30:57PM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
I hope that changelog will include something to uniquely
Hi Kir
After adding this patch it did not build, which is quite obvious because when I
read the
features/all/openvz/0047-netfilter-Fix-NULL-dereference-in-nf_nat_setup_info.patch
patch file it tells that it creates the table there.
CC [M] net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.o
LD
Thanks a lot!
Best regards,
// Ola
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 01:17:29AM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Kir
One of the patches do not work...
I 2 0016-nfs-fix-nfs-clinet-in-VE-finally.pa
[text/plain, 7bit, us-ascii, 35K]
Ok.
I
Hi Dann
Now I have gone though all the patches that Kir sent and are now doing
a test build of the proposed patch (attached).
I have attached the changes to changelog and 14-extra file and also included
a tar.gz file with all the openvz patches in the patches/features/all/openvz
dir.
As you
Hi again
The build results are now complete. It do not look like an ABI change. At least
the build process did not complain.
I have also run my usual target test on 686 platform and it passed just fine.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:49:08PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
And
Hi Kir
Thanks for the list. I have now made some work to apply this.
Below are some comments.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:00:39AM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
I am currently checking all the ~80 patches that are not in openvz
lenny kernel. Looks like most are really
Hi Kir
Result from the import. Some comments and questions.
Building right now. Results will be available soon.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:17:47AM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
I am currently checking all the ~80 patches that are not in openvz
lenny kernel. Looks like
Hi Kir
More comments...
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:54:04AM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
I am currently checking all the ~80 patches that are not in openvz
lenny kernel. Looks like most are really needed. Let me suggest some
in a few emails I will send as a reply to this
Hi Kir and Dann
I got this result from my test build. Do this mean that we have some binary
incompatibility or what does it really mean? I have not seen this kind of
behaviour before.
z8530_sync_txdma_openmodule:
drivers/net/wan/z85230, version: 0xc57f96a9 -
Hi again
I found the problem. The text was too early in my build log. I had to run it
again
to see it.
'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y'
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/ola/build/debian/kernel/linux-2.6-2.6.26/debian/build/build_i386_openvz_686'
python debian/bin/abicheck.py
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:44:04PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Dann
You asked about the latest status and here it is.
Please tell which ones you want me to fix for the next lenny release of the
kernel. I'll prepare
a patch and regression test that version for you.
#510787:
Refers to
Hi Dann
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:17:09PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:44:04PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Dann
You asked about the latest status and here it is.
Please tell which ones you want me to fix for the next lenny release of the
kernel. I'll
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 08:13:28PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Dann
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:17:09PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:44:04PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Dann
You asked about the latest status and here it is.
Please tell which ones
Hi Dann
I have to ask Kir about some of the things. Kir, please comment on the below.
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 01:42:10PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
[...]
#511165:
Patch exist for 2.6.24 and 2.6.26. Fix is available in
Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
Also, while I am at it... I am currently checking all the ~80 patches
that are not in openvz lenny kernel. Looks like most are really
needed. Let me suggest some in a few emails I will send as a reply to
this one.
Checkpointing-related patches. Needed if we want working
Looks like a few patches are already there, see below. Only 5 CPT
patches are still left. If you need I can write a new email about CPT
patches to avoid confusion.
Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
Also, while I am at it... I am currently checking all the ~80 patches
that are not in
Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
I am currently checking all the ~80 patches that are not in openvz
lenny kernel. Looks like most are really needed. Let me suggest some
in a few emails I will send as a reply to this one.
Here is a set of netfilter patches, quite a few. Some are very critical
(read
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:44:04PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Dann
You asked about the latest status and here it is.
Please tell which ones you want me to fix for the next lenny release of the
kernel. I'll prepare
a patch and regression test that version for you.
#510787:
Refers to
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:44:04PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Dann
You asked about the latest status and here it is.
Please tell which ones you want me to fix for the next lenny release of the
kernel. I'll prepare
a patch and regression test that version for you.
Wow Ola, thanks -
Hi Kir
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:27:55PM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
Since it's gonna be ABI++ anyway, we'd like to take a look at what we
have in git and maybe recommend some other critical/important bugfixes.
Ideally we'd like Debian to just pull from our git (i.e. merge all the
patches
Since it's gonna be ABI++ anyway, we'd like to take a look at what we
have in git and maybe recommend some other critical/important bugfixes.
Ideally we'd like Debian to just pull from our git (i.e. merge all the
patches we have there), but as I understand this is not how things are
working
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:27:55PM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
Since it's gonna be ABI++ anyway, we'd like to take a look at what we have
in git and maybe recommend some other critical/important bugfixes. Ideally
we'd like Debian to just pull from our git (i.e. merge all the patches we
have
Hi Dann
You asked about the latest status and here it is.
Please tell which ones you want me to fix for the next lenny release of the
kernel. I'll prepare
a patch and regression test that version for you.
#510787:
Refers to an other bug report that was not openvz specific. Should it be
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 04:47:35PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
hey,
The first lenny update is scheduled for early April, so I wanted to
start coordinating the kernel update.
Security
The lenny-security branch is currently caught up on security issues,
so I'd like to
hey,
The first lenny update is scheduled for early April, so I wanted to
start coordinating the kernel update.
Security
The lenny-security branch is currently caught up on security issues,
so I'd like to release a DSA later this week. I'd appreciate it if the
individual arch
Hi
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 04:47:35PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
hey,
The first lenny update is scheduled for early April, so I wanted to
start coordinating the kernel update.
Thanks for the information.
Security
The lenny-security branch is currently caught up on
44 matches
Mail list logo
